imaplanck.
10-17-06, 12:11 PM
I know the new admin have given us bigger avatars and a better banner and such, but I was wondering if having signatures enabled was a good idea? Or is that too greedy?
|
|
View Full Version : Can we get signatures? imaplanck. 10-17-06, 12:11 PM I know the new admin have given us bigger avatars and a better banner and such, but I was wondering if having signatures enabled was a good idea? Or is that too greedy? Absane 10-17-06, 12:18 PM No... I am in favor of there not being signatures. It takes up space and it is irrelevent on a forum like this. Nickelodeon 10-17-06, 12:19 PM I donna lika sigantures. pseud0 10-17-06, 12:39 PM Nope. Signatures are currently not available! Also we don't have intention to activate signatures. spuriousmonkey 10-17-06, 12:52 PM Please no sigs ever! Nickelodeon 10-17-06, 01:06 PM Can we get personal disclaimers? Stryder 10-17-06, 01:18 PM Signatures increase the bandwidth throughput, they take up database space and they slow down thread loading. On top of that they can be exploited either to spam or potentially to undermine the forums software. On top of that most people dislike them since they litter the place, they would overly repeat in popular threads and just think of signature like those adlinks that everyone wanted rid of. imaplanck. 10-17-06, 01:25 PM Yeah, well I wasn't here when these advents took place, so I didn't know that. It's no skin off my dick if you are all against it. I just thought maybe there would be some extra bandwidth for a small text signature. I also hate images in signatures, as you seem to be characterizing. leopold 10-17-06, 03:03 PM too bad i can't vote more than once. baumgarten 10-17-06, 03:03 PM It's important to have signatures so that we can tell who is a B1FF. For example, if someone uses this image http://www.everything-anime.com/animethemes/submitwalls/Tenchi%20Muyo!collage.jpg as their signature, they can be banned without hesitation or consideration, and there will be no lamentation. What a boon for moderation! thedevilsreject 10-17-06, 03:09 PM no sigs please, but yes you still rock plank invert_nexus 10-17-06, 06:59 PM Nope. Signatures are currently not available! Also we don't have intention to activate signatures. Good. Stand strong on this. And ban Imaplanck for suggesting it. Bells 10-17-06, 07:04 PM Ugh! I still remember the days of signatures long ago. Please don't bring them back.. lixluke 10-18-06, 05:40 PM I don't really give a damn about signatures. However I see no reason why they don't allow them. redarmy11 10-18-06, 06:31 PM I think they should be allowed. Then I can laugh at all the naysayers when they've changed their tunes and I still don't have one. imaplanck. 10-18-06, 06:32 PM :bugeye: Yeah well forget it. I didn't know you could suffer from post traumatic stress syndrome over signatures when I suggested this. redarmy11 10-18-06, 06:37 PM Yes, well we can, so shut up. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "A revolution is not a dinner party, or writing an essay, or painting a picture, or doing embroidery." - Mao Tse-Tung imaplanck. 10-18-06, 06:44 PM Yeah, well anyone would have thought I suggested murdering BigBird or something. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I've never had plastic surgery, it's a skin condition! - Michael Jackson Pete 10-18-06, 07:15 PM So YOU'RE the one!! http://people.redhat.com/sopwith/images/sadday.jpg lixluke 10-20-06, 08:09 AM Why are people so obsessed with stopping sigs? Is it ethical to stop people from having the choice to use sigs if they want? Insteald of allowing people to choose for themself, people want to choose for them. |