been watching this show.. wondering how much is made up and how much is real on the cave demon on now any of you seen it? what do you think

Lost Tapes depicts fictional, traumatic scenarios in which cryptids, aliens or supernatural creatures attack people. Although the series is shot in a documentary style and presented as if it were real, it is entirely fiction.

The series never states that its footage is real, only that it has been "inspired by the possibility that hidden creatures exist."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Tapes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_Tapes

sigh.. dyw i know these are all reinactments.. which are based off of real things i wonder what real things they are based off of

sigh.. dyw i know these are all reinactments.. which are based off of real things i wonder what real things they are based off of


"inspired by the possibility that hidden creatures exist."

In other words they've used folk tales and legends.
They're only based on "real" things if you actually believe that chupacabra etc exist.

In other words they've used folk tales and legends.
They're only based on "real" things if you actually believe that chupacabra etc exist.

no that is false dyw.. you dont have to believe in a folk tale to be based on real events.. weather you believe it or not un explained things happen where there is no logical explination and its these events that i believe in.. as i have experienced such thing not like bigfoot nor did i hear see anything i heard something and even today "this was 7 years ago" it still terries me.

does that mean i believe in bigfoot? no it means something that i cannot explain happend to me and i would love to know what actually happened..

perfect expample. architeuthis was folk lore untill it was actually taped alive in 2001. humans are so ignorant to the unknown its actually funny.

Got you.
When you said "real things" you meant the actual events that led to the supposition of these creatures, as opposed to thinking there's any reality to the creature that "arose from" the events.

The annoying thing is that a great many of the "hidden creatures" have origins in stories from so long ago we probably won't ever find out what kick-started the stories, or get enough detail to make valid estimates if we do.


architeuthis was folk lore untill it was actually taped alive in 2001
And that's been outdone:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Squid
:D

Got you.
When you said "real things" you meant the actual events that led to the supposition of these creatures, as opposed to thinking there's any reality to the creature that "arose from" the events.

The annoying thing is that a great many of the "hidden creatures" have origins in stories from so long ago we probably won't ever find out what kick-started the stories, or get enough detail to make valid estimates if we do.

i should have been more clear.. i meant the events that "folk tales" are based on

And that's been outdone:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossal_Squid
:D

Thats awesome. I look forward to the Lock Ness Monster being discovered hiding under a big rock.

thats one animal i wouldnt ever want to have a run in with.. did u see the 3 inch claws inside there suckers

In other words they've used folk tales and legends.
They're only based on "real" things if you actually believe that chupacabra etc exist.

you might be surprised . folk tales can have root origins. like Egil the archer spawned many tales of similar fashion , augmented more and more as the tales pass down . I think that is how the events transform into super natural events . Augment + . You know there is something special about the #5 chord in music. The flat 5 too .

you might be surprised . folk tales can have root origins.
Er, isn't that more or less what I said?


You know there is something special about the #5 chord in music. The flat 5 too .
Right. :shrug:

Er, isn't that more or less what I said?


Right. :shrug:
Ahhh Yeah!!