Tiassa
11-08-01, 05:43 PM
What makes a word profane?
A couple of notes on that question:
* My father taught me against profanity on the grounds that profane words "mean nothing". I understand his point, that words so generally applied have no real meaning. On the one hand, I wonder why this is cause for complaint. To the other, that point is almost entirely irrelevant. However, among those of my own generation closest to me, we share a certain regard for profane words: They are expressions of meaningless, rather than meaningless themselves. To say of an event, It's an outrage, may describe the nature of the event. But to say of an event, It's a fucking outrage, characterizes that sense of outrage some. The expression of meaninglessness inherent in the term fucking indicates an ineffable degree. Example? Flying jet airplanes into buildings is an outrage. Killing six million people for thier religion is a fucking outrage. So even the parentally-advised standard regarding profanity seems inadequate cause to exscind these words from acceptable culture.
* In 9th grade or thereabout, someone pointed out that certain English-language profanities became such after the Norman invasion when the indigenous tongues were frowned upon; certain of these words survive today in various forms and have profane connotations.
* I recall watching a particularly odd argument when in high school whereby a mother called her daughter all manner of insulting names: slut, hussy, prostitute, bitch, ad nauseam. The argument never reached its conclusion because the young lady expressed that she didn't understand what all this shit was about, and suddenly, the argument became about her mouth. Let me here attest that, as we plucked fingernail segments out of her arm and after she finished the routine vomiting that came after an argument with her parents that she was still unsure what started the argument. Most curious, however, is that the vital issues compelling a mother to criticize her daughter as sexually immoral (and, presumably, behaving in a manner detrimental to her health and wellbeing) are apparently secondary to words deemed profane.
Here at Sciforums we sling some rather impressive insults at each other; yet the greater portion of the complaints acted upon by our moderators involve "profane" words. (Let me note here that it is my understanding that our moderators generally won't interfere until someone complains, so we might thus conclude that the greater portion of the complaints have to do with words deemed profane by one or more posters.)
Watch television recently? In the US, you can say, "asshole", "dick", "prick", "shit", "cock", "blowjob", and a host of other terms deemed unsavory by many. However, when you say "Goddamn it," on television, "God" is censored, and not the "damn", which is a word generally considered inappropriate for use. Is "God" a profane word?
Noting the growing acceptance of words like "damn" and "hell", we might also note that we still instruct children against using them. A preacher can talk about the damned, but if parents in that preacher's congregation hear children using the word even in the religious context, they are often corrected. Why is this?
Interestingly enough, nobody has ever really established what makes a word profane. Certes, some have written of it in the past, but no real consensus can be reached as to why certain words are profane.
So I'm curious: what makes a word profane? Recall, please, as we devise our standards, the number of colloquialisms bestowed on the American culture in recent years: jiggy, diggity-dank, "da bomb", and a host of words like "shag" which have legitimate meanings which are disregarded in their colloquial form. These are all meaningless words. What is jiggy? What, outside of marijuana, where "dank" has an acceptably accurate meaning, does "diggity-dank" mean? How does one become "da bomb"? Meaningless words, to my father's chagrin, do not become profane merely for their lack of meaning.
Prudish standards toward utilitarianism don't suffice. Sure, "penis" is the word, and "cock" is a profane word when applied to the penis, but why are "Union Jack", "One-Eyed Willie", "Scottish Monster", "Python of Love", "Heat-Seeking-Moisture-Missile", "dingleberries", "family jewels" not censored?
Is "cocksucker" a bad offense because it's usually aimed at a male and implies homosexuality?
Why is "cunt" obscene or profane, and "Madame Butterfly" cute and euphemistic?
Everyone I know to whom I show the Gorillaz Rock da House video points out the same thing: What, you can't say "ass-crack"?
Really, I think people should be able to say, write, or broadcast whatever they want. It's not like we're forcing the protestations to be silent: people can still make what value judgements they will. You are welcome to think less of someone whose only word for describing negativity is "shit", but I don't think a person's opinion of a word should be a prohibitionist law.
So I'm curious: What makes a word profane?
Start with the basics: Can you tell me why any of the following words are profane?
* Fuck
* Shit
* Cock
* Cunt
(A note to our kind host and moderators: I know, I know. But that's part of the point. We know these words are "profane", but nobody's ever given much of a reason why. It comes down, I think, to that people just learn or choose to not like these words, which makes it a matter of comparative principles; in other words, one's freedom to speak being limited by another's subjective sense of taste. So I'm curious why these words are profane. In general, I shall continue to approach these words as I have since recent considerations involving Oxygen's moderation; that is, I shall continue to pick profanities carefully, euphemize them at other times, and simply omit letters at others. But the issue of why a word is profane is one I've always wondered about, and even moreso since a single word apparently bears so much weight when juxtaposed against the nastiness that flies around this board. I shall, for your comfort, reserve such explicitness as this topic post includes to this exploration.)
thanx all,
Tiassa :cool:
A couple of notes on that question:
* My father taught me against profanity on the grounds that profane words "mean nothing". I understand his point, that words so generally applied have no real meaning. On the one hand, I wonder why this is cause for complaint. To the other, that point is almost entirely irrelevant. However, among those of my own generation closest to me, we share a certain regard for profane words: They are expressions of meaningless, rather than meaningless themselves. To say of an event, It's an outrage, may describe the nature of the event. But to say of an event, It's a fucking outrage, characterizes that sense of outrage some. The expression of meaninglessness inherent in the term fucking indicates an ineffable degree. Example? Flying jet airplanes into buildings is an outrage. Killing six million people for thier religion is a fucking outrage. So even the parentally-advised standard regarding profanity seems inadequate cause to exscind these words from acceptable culture.
* In 9th grade or thereabout, someone pointed out that certain English-language profanities became such after the Norman invasion when the indigenous tongues were frowned upon; certain of these words survive today in various forms and have profane connotations.
* I recall watching a particularly odd argument when in high school whereby a mother called her daughter all manner of insulting names: slut, hussy, prostitute, bitch, ad nauseam. The argument never reached its conclusion because the young lady expressed that she didn't understand what all this shit was about, and suddenly, the argument became about her mouth. Let me here attest that, as we plucked fingernail segments out of her arm and after she finished the routine vomiting that came after an argument with her parents that she was still unsure what started the argument. Most curious, however, is that the vital issues compelling a mother to criticize her daughter as sexually immoral (and, presumably, behaving in a manner detrimental to her health and wellbeing) are apparently secondary to words deemed profane.
Here at Sciforums we sling some rather impressive insults at each other; yet the greater portion of the complaints acted upon by our moderators involve "profane" words. (Let me note here that it is my understanding that our moderators generally won't interfere until someone complains, so we might thus conclude that the greater portion of the complaints have to do with words deemed profane by one or more posters.)
Watch television recently? In the US, you can say, "asshole", "dick", "prick", "shit", "cock", "blowjob", and a host of other terms deemed unsavory by many. However, when you say "Goddamn it," on television, "God" is censored, and not the "damn", which is a word generally considered inappropriate for use. Is "God" a profane word?
Noting the growing acceptance of words like "damn" and "hell", we might also note that we still instruct children against using them. A preacher can talk about the damned, but if parents in that preacher's congregation hear children using the word even in the religious context, they are often corrected. Why is this?
Interestingly enough, nobody has ever really established what makes a word profane. Certes, some have written of it in the past, but no real consensus can be reached as to why certain words are profane.
So I'm curious: what makes a word profane? Recall, please, as we devise our standards, the number of colloquialisms bestowed on the American culture in recent years: jiggy, diggity-dank, "da bomb", and a host of words like "shag" which have legitimate meanings which are disregarded in their colloquial form. These are all meaningless words. What is jiggy? What, outside of marijuana, where "dank" has an acceptably accurate meaning, does "diggity-dank" mean? How does one become "da bomb"? Meaningless words, to my father's chagrin, do not become profane merely for their lack of meaning.
Prudish standards toward utilitarianism don't suffice. Sure, "penis" is the word, and "cock" is a profane word when applied to the penis, but why are "Union Jack", "One-Eyed Willie", "Scottish Monster", "Python of Love", "Heat-Seeking-Moisture-Missile", "dingleberries", "family jewels" not censored?
Is "cocksucker" a bad offense because it's usually aimed at a male and implies homosexuality?
Why is "cunt" obscene or profane, and "Madame Butterfly" cute and euphemistic?
Everyone I know to whom I show the Gorillaz Rock da House video points out the same thing: What, you can't say "ass-crack"?
Really, I think people should be able to say, write, or broadcast whatever they want. It's not like we're forcing the protestations to be silent: people can still make what value judgements they will. You are welcome to think less of someone whose only word for describing negativity is "shit", but I don't think a person's opinion of a word should be a prohibitionist law.
So I'm curious: What makes a word profane?
Start with the basics: Can you tell me why any of the following words are profane?
* Fuck
* Shit
* Cock
* Cunt
(A note to our kind host and moderators: I know, I know. But that's part of the point. We know these words are "profane", but nobody's ever given much of a reason why. It comes down, I think, to that people just learn or choose to not like these words, which makes it a matter of comparative principles; in other words, one's freedom to speak being limited by another's subjective sense of taste. So I'm curious why these words are profane. In general, I shall continue to approach these words as I have since recent considerations involving Oxygen's moderation; that is, I shall continue to pick profanities carefully, euphemize them at other times, and simply omit letters at others. But the issue of why a word is profane is one I've always wondered about, and even moreso since a single word apparently bears so much weight when juxtaposed against the nastiness that flies around this board. I shall, for your comfort, reserve such explicitness as this topic post includes to this exploration.)
thanx all,
Tiassa :cool: