Bishadi
10-09-08, 10:26 AM
Within this link is the chemical structure and specta of many of the structures of living mass
http://omlc.ogi.edu/spectra/PhotochemCAD/html/index.html
now imagine identifying the structure that supports the cancerous mitosis
then identifying the wavelength to destroy the bond of that structure (one line item of em can break apart most any and every molecule)
sound like another nobel?
Bishadi
10-21-08, 11:54 AM
food for thought
and directly applicable to the understanding of life with material to identify the energy state of the mass
but not a single post or question
and folk wonder why life is not defined in the sciences; none understand what make mass alive
Bishadi
10-27-08, 10:36 AM
this one thread is enough to open up a whole can of worms to allow the next generations a chance to observe what really makes life work
and not a single comment from this whole site of people inquiring about science
People have been using the spectral properties of various life-related molecules to study how life works for decades. What do you think biochemists do all day? You mention "now imagine identifying the structure that supports the cancerous mitosis." People have been investigating that sort of thing for a long time. The problem is, how do you identify which of the bajillion things in a cell is causing it to turn cancerous? It takes a lot of tedious experimentation.
Bishadi
10-27-08, 12:28 PM
People have been using the spectral properties of various life-related molecules to study how life works for decades. What do you think biochemists do all day?
seems many are just being accepted
"2008: Osamu Shimomura, Japan, and Martin Chalfie and Roger Y. Tsien, United States, for the discovery and development of the green fluorescent protein, GFP "
but i agree in the sense of the knowledge being around for almost 50 years
You mention "now imagine identifying the structure that supports the cancerous mitosis." People have been investigating that sort of thing for a long time. The problem is, how do you identify which of the bajillion things in a cell is causing it to turn cancerous? Let's step back.
then perhaps, use the 'eyes' of the hadron
ie.... identifying that structure will do more than a boson and no need to spend billions to retool an MRI for that
It takes a lot of tedious experimentation.
the idea was to stop looking at only the structure and ID the energy (light signature).
such that to record mitosis at the reproductive cycle at a level identifying the energy release; the reaction will reveal the structure and then ID that structure and tune a wavelength to break it down
ie.... it is not required to have the full scope of energy of basic electrolysis to break down water into H and O..... the idea is to ID the ONE wavelength for that structure
every structure has a signature and this thread shares that truth
so the thread was opened to offer eyes to see
so the idea is different but not unique
me simply like to use the heart to identify things that can offer a new method of observing the problem
Have to admit with the bajillions of dollars spent, how many have observed that method of addressing the issue?
So them ask yourself; is it possible? And if it is, will the method help mankind? Are there enough resources in the field to perform it? Would this be a form to actually directly ID a single reoccurring problem within the cancer research industry?
Could it work?