squid
03-05-04, 08:38 PM
How do you quantify the strength of the linear association between the two variables with a number? :confused:
|
|
View Full Version : Statisitcs squid 03-05-04, 08:38 PM How do you quantify the strength of the linear association between the two variables with a number? :confused: shmoe 03-05-04, 10:48 PM How do you quantify the strength of the linear association between the two variables with a number? :confused: The correlation coefficient, r<sup>2</sup>: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CorrelationCoefficient.html They tell you how to calculate r<sup>2</sup> midway on that page. There's also some nice pictures show how the closer r<sup>2</sup> is to 1, the stronger the linear relation. squid 03-06-04, 12:04 AM cool, thanks for the link squid 03-08-04, 12:51 AM stuck on this problem: using the regression equation, predict the number of accidents per 1000 licenses for a city with 19% of its licensed drivers under the age of 21. regression equation: y = 1.5974 + .287053x the data: (City) (% Under 21) (Fatal Accidents per 1000 Licenses) 1 13 2.962 2 12 0.708 3 8 0.885 4 12 1.652 5 11 2.091 6 17 2.627 7 18 3.83 8 8 0.368 9 13 1.142 10 8 0.645 11 9 1.028 12 16 2.801 13 12 1.405 14 9 1.433 15 10 0.039 16 9 0.338 17 11 1.849 18 12 2.246 19 14 2.855 20 14 2.352 21 11 1.294 22 17 4.1 23 8 2.19 24 16 3.623 25 15 2.623 26 9 0.835 27 8 0.82 28 14 2.89 29 8 1.267 30 15 3.224 31 10 1.014 32 10 0.493 33 14 1.443 34 18 3.614 35 10 1.926 36 14 1.643 37 16 2.943 38 12 1.913 39 15 2.814 40 13 2.634 41 9 0.926 42 17 3.256 thanks John Connellan 03-08-04, 03:55 AM I presume u got the regression equation from the data. in that case u don't need the data any more. Just plug in 19% for x and see what comes out. squid 03-08-04, 09:56 AM ok, thanks, i got -1.54285993 AD1 03-08-04, 11:56 AM Which is impossible. John Connellan 03-08-04, 12:59 PM Thats impossible, all x's are positive and the equation constant is also positive! Tell us what u did. squid 03-08-04, 11:56 PM y = -1.5974 + .287053(.19) = -1.54285993 right? :confused: John Connellan 03-09-04, 03:59 AM Well in the last post, the equation constant was positive. Now its negative! Get rid of the negative sign there and do it again! squid 03-09-04, 11:34 AM it was originally negative. i guess i forgot to add the negative sign. also, excel calculated that equation for me. AD1 03-09-04, 03:42 PM Did you plot the percentage of drivers under 21 as decimal fractions or as percentages? Try using 19 as your x value instead of .19 if you did not do this. squid 03-09-04, 05:07 PM i plotted it as regular numbers like 1,2,3...alrighty i guess i'll use 19 instead of .19. |