Proposal: That sex without consent is always rape.

I get the whole bit about how the guy shouldn't club her in the head and drag her back to the cave, but he should make public his unhappiness next time he encounters her.

Then you go to the lol bit about the coach and I'm just lost.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

oh
hahaha

lemme then match (pun) up

the two teams are represented by sally and jim
the game itself is represented by jim and sally fucking
the coach running off the field is represented by sally leaving jim in a lurch

ja? nein?

should? nah. thats just temperament. you could always just move on

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Still I also love the story about how the man takes the woman shopping and she keeps going on about buy me this and buy me that, and then when they get to the register the guy goes oh nevermind, then walks off.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

james this is the third time i have wrote this.

For some reason when i tried to copy the definitions from the online dictonary it crashed my computer twice

Anyway the difference is that because of uni i view advocasy as specifically advocating for a pt with there doctor, or social services or whatever it is.

Where as i view activisium as trying to raise awearness for a CAUSE, be it prostate cancer, or domestic vilonce against men or domestic vilonce against women or whatever the issue happens to be.

So i view things like my posts here as activisium rather than advocasy because i have no specific outcome except to raise awearness of a topic rather than get SOMETHING for a PT (or a friend or whatever depending on the cirumstances).

However i can see your point, activisum has taken on a negitive conitation

 

SHUT THE FUCK UP ALREADY. No one on here said anything like that. Would it fucking KILL you to use some REASON for once instead of ranting and spewing hate? What do you actually want? People try and have a reasoned argument with you and all you fucking do is spew vitriol. You want us to say all woman are the oppressor? Ok, I'll say it just to shut you up.

"All women are big bad oppressors and should be pregnant and in the kitchen."

Now will you grow up and behave like a fucking HUMAN BEING??!!!

 

James, I'll happily weigh in on your side if there's a team debate.

 

Hmm. Can generally agree with all that in the list, though if I'm paying her mortgage and there's no sex, then I'm not going to be paying that mortgage.

It's like the old joke about a woman that asks her man if he'd die for her and he asks for her to clarify the statement. She gets all offended at the implication, and asks him what he means. He explains: "Well, I'm not going to die for you for fun." Anyway, I'd partner with James or whatever. Call it, Jimmy me lad.

 

It is too bad that not too many men will stand up like that when faced with women who claim to be entitled to having everything paid for them and then give nothing in return. Though I do know one guy who eventually kicked his former wife out of the house, and kept his son after he got sick of her refusal to get a job. Well not just because of her refusal to get a job, but also for her refusal to do much of any housework on top of it all.

 

No, i's not. It;s a two-way thing... well... atleast... not always... but most of the time it is.

 

No. It applies to the case where there's no love in the relationship. Sex is an expression of that. If there's no sex ever on a whim, then there's no love. This obviously does not apply to someone with legitmate medical problems. Follow? Not everything is about you.

Hey, you almost timed that pounce right, though. Golf clap.

 

I could go against both teams and beat both of them senseless. just to help out Kadark, here is a simple argument proving james wrong. (beside that the whole debate depends on the definition of rape, but you guys are not so smart to realize that)

Let's say I, er... I mean Joe has sex with a woman who is unconscious due to alchohol. He gently screws her with condom, no force, no disease passed. The woman will have no recollection of the event whatsoever and she wasn't a virgin to begin with.
There you have it, is that a rape or just a unauthorized use of her body?

let's use an analogy! Let's say Joe takes away the woman's shovel while she is on vacation. he is using it gently for a few days, than cleans it and before she comes home, he puts it back to her barn. Did he steal it? no. He used it unauthorized, just like he did it with her body...

There you have it James, I just proved that it is not ALWAYS a rape....

What do I get? Tomorrow I will prove the other side wrong...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Of course, but I have already won it (it only required to show 1 case when it is not a rape), so it is kind of moot...

It also helps if people agree on the definition...

 

Syzygys just tombstone piledriver'd James's argument to hell. He linguistically missile-toe dropkicked James in his figurative coin purse.

Kadark the Impressive