Holocaust Denial

Discussion in 'Ethics, Morality, & Justice' started by Cellar_Door, Sep 7, 2008.

  1. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Yeah, its been denied for several years now. I certainly never heard of it growing up.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Do you think there is a difference between questioning the figures of the Holocaust and denying it altogether?

    Those who were imprisoned were not sent to jail for "questioning". They were jailed for denying it ever happened and for directly manipulating and misrepresenting the evidence, or ignoring it altogether to further their own agenda. Irving is a neo-nazi, anti-semitic racist who not only denied the holocaust, he also misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence to support his cause. Citing this particular individual, at least, will result in a great loss of credibility in this debate.

    There are many historians, qualified historians, who study the holocaust in detail and who do question the exact figures stated and who research it to the finest degree of detail. They are not arrested. Do you know why? Because they present their findings as they are and do not attempt to misrepresent or ignore evidence to further their own personal beliefs about the Nazis and the Jews. When new evidence presents itself, they revise what has already been written about it in the past. In short, they are researchers and historians who are attempting to study a horrible part of human history.

    David Irving and his ilk are neo-nazis with their own agenda and will do what they can to not only misrepresent the data, but have and will suppress anything that contradicts their own personal beliefs and cause.

    So what is the difference between questioning the Holocaust and denying it ever happened? One researches and constantly updates and revises what is already known without any misrepresentation but only based on facts and the other manipulates the evidence so that it is completely misrepresented to further their own agenda.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. sniffy Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,945
    Funny that you being Indian and all.

    The colonialists committed many a dishonourable act in advancing their special interests. Slavery, indentured labour, flooding native markets with cheap imported goods and that's just to start with. Take it to another thread and we'll raise awareness.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    Don't you think it would be more appropriate to focus on the 30,000 deaths per day that are pretty much attributable to the West's economic and political approach to third world poverty? All Victorian's are dead now. (Pause while nitpickers try to find the age of oldest person in UK or India and demonstrate that they were born in Victoria's reign. Fine give me their addresses. I can fix that.) Let's get with the current action.
     
  8. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Sure, but I certainly think the British should pay for creating the Third World.
     
  9. sniffy Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,945
  10. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Can you give me an example of historians who are permitted to query the Holocaust in Germany or Austria?

    Regardless, I don't think anyone should be imprisoned for having an opinion.
     
  11. Ophiolite Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,232
    We are paying. Every evening I break down in tears at the loss of the Empire.
     
  12. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    lock them up and throw the key. one holocaust is enough.
     
  13. Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Go to any history department of a university where the Holocaust is studied.

    They don't question the validity of the holocaust itself. They study it. Surely you aren't saying it didn't happen? Holocaust denial is based on denying it ever happened. Irving and those in his camp do not question or query the holocaust. They claim it never happened. Historians who study the holocaust do just that. Study it and question the evidence that is available, not to deny it, but to attempt to gauge the true impact and numbers. Deniers misrepresent and manipulate the evidence that is available, and there is a lot, so that it supports their personal viewpoints.

    The terms "Holocaust denier" and "Holocaust denial" are often objected to by the people to whom they are applied. These people typically prefer "revisionist" and "revisionism".[4] Scholars believe that term to be misleading, however.[5] While historical revisionism is the re-examination of accepted history, with an eye towards updating it with newly discovered, more accurate, or less-biased information, deniers seek evidence to support a preconceived theory, omitting substantial facts.[10]

    Historical revisionism is an academic approach that holds that a given slice of history, as it has been traditionally told, may not be entirely accurate, and should hence be revised accordingly. Historical revisionism in this sense is a well-accepted and mainstream part of history studies, and it is applied to the study of the Holocaust as new facts emerge and change our understanding of it. A very different process unfolds when someone proceeds from the premise that a major element of human history is simply inaccurate, and ignores or routinely minimizes evidence that conflicts with that premise. History done in this way is not revisionism, but denial.[11]

    Because the term "revisionist" has become associated with Holocaust deniers, Holocaust historians today generally avoid using it to describe themselves, though they continue to study and revise opinions on aspects of the Holocaust. In the words of historian Donald Niewyk of Southern Methodist University:

    "With the main features of the Holocaust clearly visible to all but the willfully blind, historians have turned their attention to aspects of the story for which the evidence is incomplete or ambiguous. These are not minor matters by any means, but turn on such issues as Hitler's role in the event, Jewish responses to persecution, and reactions by onlookers both inside and outside Nazi-controlled Europe."[12]​

    Holocaust denial is sometimes referred to as "negationism", from the French term Le négationnisme, introduced by Henry Rousso.[13] Negationists attempt to rewrite history by minimizing, denying or simply ignoring essential facts. According to Jacques Derrida:

    "Generally speaking, 'revisionism' in history is the attempt to critique established dogmas, a critique that can in no way be included in with the type of negationism that attempts to deny the reality of acknowledged facts."[14]

    According to Koenraad Elst:

    "Negationism means the denial of historical crimes against humanity. It is not a reinterpretation of known facts, but the denial of known facts. The term negationism has gained currency as the name of a movement to deny a specific crime against humanity, the Nazi genocide on the Jews in 1941-45, also known as the holocaust (Greek: fire sacrifice) or the Shoah (Hebrew: disaster). Negationism is mostly identified with the effort at re-writing history in such a way that the fact of the Holocaust is omitted."​


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial
     
  14. Betrayer0fHope MY COHERENCE! IT'S GOING AWAYY Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,311
    I'm a Libertarian, but fuck, even I think the laws are all right in this case. Don't deny the Holocaust, it's that simple. This isn't really an important issue in my mind.
     
  15. Challenger78 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,536
    Yeah, but don't go using it as an excuse to go killing people either, which is what the Israeli's have done.
     
  16. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Nonsense. The remaining Jews in Europe didn't leave for no reason. Zionism as a movement was going on way before WWII.
     
  17. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    24 posts in this thread alone SAM, came to defend the holocaust deniers rights?
     
  18. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    why not, you try to defend the israili holocaust all the time, why should any one care anymore how many jews were killed

    no different from how little care everyone has to any US caualties 7 years ago, there was alot of sympathy until people saw how they used it and now no one gives a toss
     
  19. Mr.Spock Back from the dead Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,938
    the Israeli holocaust?

    im not even gonna bother to response to that. go to the nearest library and educate yourself what a holocaust is.
     
  20. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    the genocide of a people, ie what your doing to the palistinians

    come to think of it maybe the problem is actually sympathising with a people

    look what bosnia did when the west rescued them from the serbs, look what israli has done since the west rescued them from the germans and look what the US has done since the west sympathised with them over 11/9/01

    maybe the key is to never help anyone out
     
  21. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    what do you do when someone helps you out?
     
  22. StrangerInAStrangeLand SubQuantum Mechanic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,396
    If only there had been only 1.
     
  23. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    if only there had been none.
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2008

Share This Page