I have to disagree. My guess is that the test was done incorrectly. A pretty face on an ugly body (let's say incredibly fat) is less SEXUALLY attractive than an ugly face on a hot body. If it is asked this way, what do you GUYS say?
It depends on how hideous the face and/or the body was. Here are two good examples, IMO, to choose from: -Pre-'plastic surgery experiment gone horribly wrong' Delta Burke at her highest weight (and it was up there) vs. Sarah Jessica Parker IMO, SJP is the lesser of the two evils there. So yeah, in this case I would be in agreement. That doesn't mean I would always choose the butter face...well probably.
Me too........ If he looks like he got hit in the face by a train, a gorgeous body just won't make up for it for me.
Depends how ugly. If they need a full facial makeover that could cost thousands and thousands of dollars. There is a good chance they wouldn't be able to afford it.
If you are going extreme with the body you have to go extreme with the face too. I know I'm not a guy, but when you're dealing with extremes they would both be a turn off for me. (of coures being extremely fat can distort the facial features making someone who is already pretty... less pretty)
It can be extremely thin too, the point is that there should be an unattractive body with the pretty face. SJP is a good choice. I remember her in Striking distance thinking, we have to put a bucket over her head or somethin'....
So are you trying to say that you are one of the 8% who thinks that a hot body is more important than a pretty face when it comes to women they are sexually attracted to?
WELL, you can always cover said ugly face with a bag Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Or my Boyfriend has used this one when we have come across someone with a good body but real ugly face. Oh well, can always just shove their face in a pillow! Then I give him this look ...:bugeye: lol
Why go to that trouble? Just do her doggy style. I vote body, btw. I'd much rather do SJP than Delta Burke. What about this: Would you rather do a woman with an average body and a gorgeous face or a fantastic body and an average face?
I knew you would come through...Mad or is it you Nietzschefan? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I would agree with that for the most part. However, there are variables, some might have a great face but an average body and still be very attractive, some might have an ok face with a great body. So there is a range in between for both. I think much of it is the eye of the beholder. I don't like women who are real tall and thin like the models in the magazines. I like them small and petite and fit. 5ft to 5-6 max with femine features like small hands and feet. Great hair is also very attractive. The other thing is how they dress. Some women have great style, they wear clothes that look great on them and others have no clue what they are doing.
Damn shorty, that's not bad...not bad. Though too muscular doesn't really appeal to me. Well, madanthony, that's a good point, however I am female. But your point still counts, I guess. lol I'd rather do a fantastic body with an average face. I'm serious. A necessary thing men need to have: good legs, sexy ass, nice hands and wide shoulders and back. Face is second to that. My men don't need to have a pretty face....it suffice to be cute or smart looking. I admit.....when engaging in sexual activities I don't pay much attention to the face...but please...don't look like this: http://www.itsonlyamovie.co.uk/gifs/ugly face 1 tile.jpg
Yeah. he isn't exactly my cup of tea..but it was the closest thing to hot with a bag on his head I could find..Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Let's make this easier gentlemen. Which turns you on more: Sarah Jessica Parker Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! or Delta Burke Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!Judging by those two pics, there's no contest.
