Fukushi has been around for many a year. The moniker is more familiar to me than any you think he might be now.
as a matter of fact, I was reading that other tread and just when I tought it was going somewhere, JamesR closed it up, so that's why I made the comment. no offence Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
None taken I was just surprised. I thought you were draqon Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I'm not sure what you are talking about, regarding people claiming "exists in a pure form", but I'm comfortable with human rights being established by political effort, answering to reason with evidence, without (explicitly without, btw, in most cases of establishment) the installation of any "final authority" overall.
No, not returning stolen goods, in terms of explicit overtures to Palestine. Like "lets share the land and be friends".
*Beep Beep* Which Arabs? *Beep Beep Beep* Which temple? *Beep* The exile is a myth. *BEEP BEEP BEEP* The Palestinians are the original Jews.
It's all a mute point IMO. I've yet to hear SAM defend the Native Americans against further migration of Muslims (and other peoples).... Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Why would native Americans need defending from migration? I believe you've migrated to Australia, are you occupying the Australians? Is there a reason why you are unable to distinguish the two?
Are you really comparing the precolonial invasions to the population replacement carried out by Europeans? Just look at India today and the US today. Which condition do you think the native Americans would prefer? Running their own country or being replaced by a foreign culture and peoples?
Funny thing SAM is that they are running their own country, and they have dual citizenship, the best of both world. And guess what, even in India, they are voting with their feet and trying to move to America.
You pick and choose what is right and what is wrong and your criteria is - if it's Muslims doing it, it's Glorious. Europeans colonized the America's. European descendants control migration into and out of the Americans. Muslims, such as SAM, think it's fine to migrate and live on this European-descendant controlled post-colonized land. Until I mentioned it, it's probably never even occurred to that you migrating and living in the USA is a hypocritical act. I see no difference with Israel. Same thing. Europeans colonized the land. Europeans control migration into the land. I see no difference with Arabs colonizing Persia. Arabs colonized the land. Arabs controlled migration into the land. Asians from the mainland colonized Japan. The Ainu lost control. "Japanese" now control the land. It's the same story over and over. Now, this is the thing. I think forced colonization was wrong. You don't. That's the difference. So, you should find yourself in good company with Zionists. You both see the glory in taking other people's land. It's really quite simple, Michael
Try again: So if someone moved into your house and let you live in the bathtub but allowed you to use his mailing address, you'd consider it the best of both worlds? You can respond in this thread I started on the subject: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=95954 We have a billion people, there isn't a single country where Indians are not moving
No SAM, it isn't try again, it is a heated fantasy, with no factual basis, a fever in your mind. And why are they moving? because of the cesspool that India is and sinking deeper into.