i am not surprised in the least. Sarcasm is a particular form of humor. Humor, according to researchers, requires significant IQ for creation and appreciation. So, Ben, you don't get the joke. So......
Heh... http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=100140 I rest my case. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I'm fine admitting I'm not a genius. Others, however, seem to think that they can read an account of special relativity in a comic book and understand how to quantize gravity.
THIS IS interesting. Here I thought nushell wasn't even a word. I am going to follow up an that link when I have more time!
All you nutshell people, break my simple twins thread refutation of SR in this forum. Then, you can claim your logic. Otherwise..............
Sometimes you feel like a Flake, sometimes you don't......oh wait we were talking nuts, right?, Right???
Yea. I forced the absoluteness of the clock sync up against reciprocal time dilation. It cannot be broken. The clock sync gives one answer only "free from contradictions" and reciprocal time dilation gives two at least one of which the clock sync will contradict. This is all under the rules of SR.
Jack's criteria is that if you disagree with him then you're too primitive to have a valid opinion, though he craves people giving him their opinion, and if you're in a journal then you're too close minded to admit he's right. Basically if you disagree with Jack he'll provide some reason not to listen to you.