New Theory Suggests the Laws of Physics Evolved

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by MarkCGreer, Mar 7, 2012.

  1. MarkCGreer Registered Member

    Messages:
    21
    Fascinating:

    Just as bacteria still exists as evidence of some of the first life on Earth, quantum activity is evidence of the first energy of the universe. Energy is constantly being created. People like to think of the universe as being made of particles, but everything in our universe may be made up of a "will" or "intent", not a "thing". This early energy was void of the laws of physics and through a natural selection process, combinations of this energy with the right properties survived to make up our universe today. This theory could solve several mysteries of science.

    The full press release at evolveduniverse dot blogspot dot com
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. markl323 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    166
    :m::m::m:
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    But can it slove the mystery of how could an idea this stupid could be proposed?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Pincho Paxton Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,387
  8. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Good drugs dude.
     
  9. C C Consular Corps - "the backbone of diplomacy" Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,324
    Alas, Franken-Logic strikes again. Arthur Schopenhauer's "will" stitched to Daniel Dennett's "universal acid" in the lightning powered reanimation lab. Victor: "Behold the twitching, convulsing newborn that the storm breathes monstrous life into..."
     
  10. Michael 歌舞伎 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,285
    The latest evidence suggests the universe we live in spontaneously popped into existence without a first cause.
     
  11. MarkCGreer Registered Member

    Messages:
    21
    Please give specific reasons why this theory is flawed. Do not hold back.
     
  12. MarkCGreer Registered Member

    Messages:
    21
    I understand it is very general, but what about the principle? Where are the flaws in logic?
     
  13. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    What logic? It simply word salad.
     
  14. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    First problem this is devoid of meaning. What exactly is 'quantum activity' and how is that evidence of the first energy?

    This is completely at odds with physics.


    What is this suppost to mean. So the beer I am drinking is not made up of molecules, it is made of will or intent? Really? What is your evidence of that? It tastes like a thing.

    So some laws were tried but they were unable to reproduce so they died out? Isn't natural selection a law. What is a combination of energy and properties.

    How could this possible answer anything?

    Sounds like an advertisement for a pseudo-science site.
     
  15. MarkCGreer Registered Member

    Messages:
    21
    I recall seeing Susskind in a documentary admit he was baffled at how the force of gravity was so perfect in our universe. Just one tick more and we collapse, 1 tick less, we fly apart. The leading theory suggests that we popped into existence with our current laws of physics. Doesn't that sound ridiculous? And doesn't it sound far more plausible that gravitation of all levels existed in particles only for the perfectly balanced particles to "rise to the top"? I can't be the first person to suggest this, yet I Google universe evolved or law of physics evolved and I find nothing. No one has ever considered this much more plausible explanation.
     
  16. MarkCGreer Registered Member

    Messages:
    21
    Yes, I remember my 7th grade science teacher "matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed". But more energy can enter the universe if there is an opposite energy to keep it at 0.

    Is it not possible that the universe came from nothing? And if the universe came from nothing would that not mean energy was created? Or that any energy that enters this world has an opposite energy so that it remains 0. The whole multiverse should add up to 0. And if it weren't for imperfection, we would never have fluctuated from 0. This part is all Hawking and Krauss not me.
     
  17. MarkCGreer Registered Member

    Messages:
    21
    Quantum activity is what the world would look like if there we no laws of physics - unpredictable, without pattern or reason. This is where perfect 0 fails to stay perfect 0.
     
  18. MarkCGreer Registered Member

    Messages:
    21
    This is the most profound thing about the universe. It is not made of of "substance". Matter is of course made of energy. And energy in its most primitive simplest form is an imbalance. Your beer is made up of an imbalance in force. You understand String theory, correct? String theory is close - but they aren't vibrating strings, they are merely an intangible imbalance.
     
  19. MarkCGreer Registered Member

    Messages:
    21
    "This early energy was void of the laws of physics and through a natural selection process, combinations of this energy with the right properties survived to make up our universe today."

    Yes, I agree this is confusing. It means that particles with the precise level of attraction stuck around and orbited one another, while particles that pulled too strong or too weak, fell out of the picture.
     
  20. MarkCGreer Registered Member

    Messages:
    21
    How does it solve other mysteries? It solves all the mysteries I mentioned in the paper.

    It's not a pseudo-science site. I hate pseudo science. Its merely a one page press release on Google's blogger.

    I get it. I waltz in here with my know-it-all theory expecting you all to bow to me, and you're all annoyed. OK, sorry, yes, I wasn't sure what to expect, but I get it.
     
  21. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    It's total nonsense.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. Boris2 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,106
    ok, you reckon you have a theory. what can you predict with it and how can it be falsified?
     
  23. Crunchy Cat F-in' *meow* baby!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,423
    What was presented is not a theory (i.e. a model). It is a series of speculations and it's chalk full of incorrect information; however, I will point out two items I noticed right at the start:

    *nothing* (i.e. the absence of everything and anything), has not been demonstrated to exist. It's a human-made concept with no correspondence to actual reality.

    This is incorrect. I presume you are referring to virtual particles. They are not *something* coming from *nothing*. They are temporary fluctuations in already existing fields that permeate space-time.
     

Share This Page