Existence of god

Discussion in 'Religion' started by shivansh, Mar 27, 2013.

  1. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Evolution shows how the appearance of design can come about through non-intelligent processes. And a computer can process information without consciousness. Any other ideas?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Fork Banned Banned

    Messages:
    319
    Being.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    So, there exists a being, therefore there exists a being? That's not even an argument, you are simply asserting something.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. gmilam Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,522
    Fork off.
     
  8. Fork Banned Banned

    Messages:
    319
    Lol. Funny. Because of your pathetic little ignorance. I admit that my name is a little simple, but that shouldn't detract from my words.
     
  9. Jan Ardena OM!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,968
    1. So what?

    2. Can a computer ever come into being without consciousness?

    jan.
     
  10. quinnsong Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,621
    Another words anything is a possibility. Hmmm I can get with that!
     
  11. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    1. So... design isn't evidence of consciousness.
    2. Yes! Look up cellular automata.
     
  12. Jan Ardena OM!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,968
    spidergoat,

    1. Design is evidence of consciousness. You need to show that it isn't.

    2. Provide evidence of a computer having built itself, without the aid of consciousness.

    jan.
     
  13. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    1. No it isn't. Evolution is an example. Design can be the result of eroding away variations that don't "work".
    2. I did. These cellular automata are the result of simple rules or algorithms, and some of them are capable of calculations. In fact, physics itself is a computational engine. When I drop a ball, gravity calculates the rate of acceleration, air resistance, how high the ball will bounce, etc...
     
  14. elte Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,345
    I wouldn't call it design except metaphorically.
     
  15. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    It's not precise to say that living things were designed, that's right, but it is a way complex forms come about. Even people that design things are now using evolutionary algorithms, much as nature does.
     
  16. Jan Ardena OM!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,968
    1. Design IS evidence of consciousnesss, what ur talking about are random processes which affect the landscape which WE can interpret as design.

    2. Here, let me bring you crashing down to earth.

    A computer cannot build itself from scratch, without the aid of consciousness at some point Even if in the future computers could perform such a task
    it would be due to consciousness.

    jan.
     
  17. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    Bohm's "Wholeness and the Implicate Order", has an elegant unifying theory where meta-physical dynamics (Potentials) express themselves in reality as the Explicate, but are fundamentally connected to the wavelike function of the entire universe as a continuous whole. The Holomovement of the universe.

    Now if you also qualify this "condition" as implacable, I can get with that also. I like the notion of inevitability much better than that of an alien intelligence.
     
  18. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Evolution is a natural process whereby many designs are generated at random, and the ones that don't work die before they reproduce. That natural selection is not random. The result is a "design" that works, with no intervention by any intelligence.



    Of course it can. Physical objects themselves are computers. When water boils, that is a computer calculating the boiling point of that water. Your confusion comes from not knowing what a computer is. Bacteria aren't intelligent, but they contain computers that measure variables in the environment, and cause the cell to react accordingly.
     
  19. Write4U Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    20,069
    A perfect example is the "slime mold", a brainless blob of single celled protists, a true mindless intelligence.

    http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=brainless-slime-molds
     
  20. Jan Ardena OM!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,968
    spidergoat,


    Did you miss the definition of ''design'' I gave? Here it is again.


    For starters, physical objects don't build themselves from scratch.
    Regarding ''physical objects themselves are computers'', can you provide links.

    Are you sure bacteria aren't intelligent?

    jan.
     
  21. Jan Ardena OM!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,968
    Why ''mindless''?

    A mind (pron.: /ˈmaɪnd/) is the complex of cognitive faculties that enables consciousness, perception, thinking, and judgement—a characteristic of humans, but which also may apply to other life forms....

    wiki

    Remember back in the day what was thought of the cell?
    Don't be quick to jump to conclusions.

    jan.
     
  22. Baldeee Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,226
    I think you are arguing cross purpose.
    Spidergoat is arguing that nothing other than living creatures displays consciousness.
    You are arguing that anything built or designed is evidence of consciousness.
    The crossing of positions is due to the ambiguous phrase "evidence of consciousness in..."
    You say that the is evidence of consciousness in anything designed...
    The design is evidence of consciousness.
    Not in the designed object itself.
    But in the designer.
    Spidergoat is saying that there is only evidence for consciousness actually being in/part of living matter etc.
    Unless you know how the universe began, this claim is limited to merely the inner workings of the universe, but not the universe itself.
    It also depends on what you mean by "from scratch"...
    Energy does pop in and out of existence all the time...
    And there is an energy / matter equivalence.
    Some even argue they are the same thing, one merely a concentration of the other.
     
  23. Jan Ardena OM!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,968
    I see your point. Maybe I should have stated specifically ''due to conscious agents''.

    The point which prompted a response from spidergoat actually acknowledged this point (to some degree)...

    ...so I'm not sure (if you're correct) why spidergoat would challenge me on something we agree upon. :shrug:

    I don't know how the universe began, and unless someone was there, nobody does. But there are ideas/theories, the most popular one being ''the big bang theory''. This means all energy, time, and space came into being at the same time. Now if these are all there is, it begs a couple of questions. What was the cause of this explosion? What was before the BB?

    Can you imagine ''nothing''? No time, no space, no energy, no mind, complete nothingness.
    Personally I can't do that. I always imagine it to be a blank space, which of course doesn't count because that is something.
    If we can't even imagine nothing (i'll assume you can't), then how can we postulate that something can come from ''nothing''?

    My question is: How can anything build itself, and happen to have some real purpose in the universe, without some kind of plan?

    Welcome to Sciforums!

    jan.
     

Share This Page