Possibility of star formation around black holes

Discussion in 'Alternative Theories' started by Beaconator, Jan 27, 2014.

  1. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    You've been told that too.

    So what is your point?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    That it doesn't solve the problem , of BH causing galactic jets ..

    These jets are a contradiction to the Nature of BH , simply put

    And always will be
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543


    Only with regards to silly unsupported, unreviewed alternative nonsense.
    Mainstream cosmology has a valid theory aligning with current known laws.
    Finally, as always, what you think makes no difference to the educated interpretations, based on real data and real evidence.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    In what way. The material forming the jets comes from the accretion disk, outside the event horizon. How many times can you ignore being told?
     
  8. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    No , the material , the energy , comes from the galactic core

    Your mistaking two stars , one drawing , energy , from the other . This has nothing to do with galactic jets

    Anybody reading this thread would know this
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    No, the material in polar jets comes from accretion disks, but most SMBH's are at the center of galaxies.


    Wrong. It has everything to do with galactic jets.
    Matter is drawn from one to the other to form an accretion disk, and then it spirals into the BB, perhaps being twisted and thrown upwards and outwards, depending on that BH's properties.


    Sorry, I'm not totally familiar with too many forms of conspiracies, alternative rubbish, and pseudoscience.
    That's your department.
     
  10. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Disagree with all this

    Show that the galactic core , has these jets connected with it , from the accretion discs

    You won't and can't
     
  11. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    You can't argue with a crank. river just posts nonsense, without ever checking on anything. He'll believe any bit of woo, has no knowledge whatsoever of science, but can't be shown anything mainstream.
     
  12. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    From my post #507 , show me the evidence , that the jets come from , and/or are augmented by the accretion disc , to the galactic jets
     
  13. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Did you look at the photos in post 455 and 457?

    Or this one, from the source YOU linked to previously?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  14. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    What about these pictures , they don't show that the accretion disc has anything to do with the jets
     
  15. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    Either you're really stupid, or your being a petulant child, jumping up and down shouting 'it is not, it is not'

    There's the jets from that galactic center and a close up picture of the accretion disk around the galactic center. What would you accept as evidence? A youtube video?
     
  16. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    So what , there is accretion disc around the galactic center . I don't see any evidence that this disc tributes to the jets themselves
     
  17. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
  18. Beaconator Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,486
    Holy shit I just realized you are right! I was going to reply to an alternate "picture" of yours,but I just got a warning on another topic about this very subject.

    It is possible black holes exist and dont exist at the same time!
     
  19. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Nasa is not the absolute authority on this , at all

    Your appealing to authority , doesn't work with me

    Nasa is wrong , no different from what has been put forward already

    There is no evidence , from photos that this is true

    The observations of jets , from the galactic core , show no evidence , that these jets have anything to do with their accretion disc
     
  20. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
  21. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    They are just saying the same thing as before

    There is nothing new here , and alot is just speculation

    The point is and I have said this many times , if the black-hole draws everything into it , how are the energy of jets even possible ?

    Since light can not escape a black-hole , why would energy at any level be able to escape the BH pull towards it ?

    It shouldn't be possible
     
  22. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543



    Ditto, ditto, and ditto again.

    Everything that he has asked, has been asked and answered before.
    Sad, really sad.
     
  23. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    See?
    Firstly he is of the opinion that a BH draws everything in.
    If that were the case, we wouldn't be here.
    Secondly he appears ignorant of the photon sphere, and the fact that not all light is drawn into the BH....
    Thirdly he doesn't seem to be aware that the only place where all light is stopped/reversed, is inside the EH....
    But again, all this has been told to him before. :shrug:


    His only Interest is pushing Electric/Plasma hypothesis, that was debunked as nonsense years and years ago.
     

Share This Page