Theory of everything

Is this the you from 2087?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Ooops, sorry I left the door of your play pen open! Byeee

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

See ya!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You have an hypothesis. You do not have a theory, at least not a scientific theory. Not until your hypothesis undergoes peer review.

 

paddoboy, If it's 2014 now, and you time traveled for 2 years, did you come from 2016 or 2012? How can you tell the difference?

 

The evidence on this forum over the years, is pretty conclusive that all our alternative nuts that have claimed to have a TOE, all quickly turn violent when their bullshit doesn't gell with anyone, then they are inevitable banned for continued bad behavour and rants about moderation etc, then the insidious dishonesty comes into play with sneaky new handles and trying to return under everyones guard.
We actually expect no better from them, as these forums are the only outlets they have, as I mentioned before.

 

You sound like Bells. Just sayin'

 

Are you talking about the Universe being the "Ultimate Free Lunch"?
If so, there is some reasonably logical speculation to that scenario...Just speculative though.
see the following.....
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
https://www.astrosociety.org/publications/a-universe-from-nothing/

A Universe from Nothing

In the inflationary theory, matter, antimatter, and photons were produced by the energy of the false vacuum, which was released following the phase transition. All of these particles consist of positive energy. This energy, however, is exactly balanced by the negative gravitational energy of everything pulling on everything else. In other words, the total energy of the universe is zero! It is remarkable that the universe consists of essentially nothing, but (fortunately for us) in positive and negative parts. You can easily see that gravity is associated with negative energy: If you drop a ball from rest (defined to be a state of zero energy), it gains energy of motion (kinetic energy) as it falls. But this gain is exactly balanced by a larger negative gravitational energy as it comes closer to Earth’s center, so the sum of the two energies remains zero.

The idea of a zero-energy universe, together with inflation, suggests that all one needs is just a tiny bit of energy to get the whole thing started (that is, a tiny volume of energy in which inflation can begin). The universe then experiences inflationary expansion, but without creating net energy.

What produced the energy before inflation? This is perhaps the ultimate question. As crazy as it might seem, the energy may have come out of nothing! The meaning of “nothing” is somewhat ambiguous here. It might be the vacuum in some pre-existing space and time, or it could be nothing at all – that is, all concepts of space and time were created with the universe itself.

Quantum theory, and specifically Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, provide a natural explanation for how that energy may have come out of nothing. Throughout the universe, particles and antiparticles spontaneously form and quickly annihilate each other without violating the law of energy conservation. These spontaneous births and deaths of so-called “virtual particle” pairs are known as “quantum fluctuations.” Indeed, laboratory experiments have proven that quantum fluctuations occur everywhere, all the time. Virtual particle pairs (such as electrons and positrons) directly affect the energy levels of atoms, and the predicted energy levels disagree with the experimentally measured levels unless quantum fluctuations are taken into account.

Perhaps many quantum fluctuations occurred before the birth of our universe. Most of them quickly disappeared. But one lived sufficiently long and had the right conditions for inflation to have been initiated. Thereafter, the original tiny volume inflated by an enormous factor, and our macroscopic universe was born. The original particle-antiparticle pair (or pairs) may have subsequently annihilated each other – but even if they didn’t, the violation of energy conservation would be minuscule, not large enough to be measurable.

If this admittedly speculative hypothesis is correct, then the answer to the ultimate question is that the universe is the ultimate free lunch! It came from nothing, and its total energy is zero, but it nevertheless has incredible structure and complexity. There could even be many other such universes, spatially distinct from ours.

 

paddoboy, If it's 2014 now, and you time traveled for 2 years, did you come from 2016 or 2012? How can you tell the difference?

 

Hello bvillon i see many of u here

 

Join at the alternative theories section

 

As I said previously, you'll be number 5, the other four have been washed away with the sewage.
Please note carefully though, that the article I presented, from a qualified professional, is still at this stage speculative.
A couple of things you need to accept is that all our current theories and models say nothing about any time from t+10-43 seconds up to BH singularities.
Secondly and more obviously, if you had anything of substance you would not be here along with the other trolls and nuts we have roaming unrestrained.
And finally you should consider diluting your self admitted delusions of grandeur and inflated ego with a dose of humility and respect for the giants of the present and past. I offer as an example Albert Einstein himself, arguably the greatest of them all, yet a man not afraid to admit to error and with plenty of that humility.

 

i do not see a " no "

 

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/what-is-time.143040/page-51#post-3253375

 

So then oh inflated one....Why are you here?
Why not gather your evidence and get it peer reviewed?
The next physics Nobel is 11 months away, but you would be a shoe in...If of course you had anything of value.

 

Yep, just as I thought. You have nothing of any substance.

 

Something to seriously consider.
Even if you were an employed scientist, with a theory, I would ask the same question.
How do you know when you have knowledge of everything? I.e., all phenomena, all forms of matter and energy. Based on history, knowledge is a process of continuing refinement, resulting from new discoveries.
Wouldn't this imply "everything" being qualified "as of now"?

 

it's already a joke. and now i for sure know your math is flawed without even looking at it.

 

an obvious house of cards ?

 

lets see how foolish i am. post it. it's that simple.