A Paradox of science.

Your "diagram" is
A) wrong, and
B) nonsense.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

More correctly, he doesn't have ANY idea how science works.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Wrong and nonsense at the same time, well if you think it is nonsense how do you know it is wrong if you can not understand it?

Are you saying the sun is not a positive?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That's like saying "I am an excellent pilot. I don't understand how the controls work, and I don't really understand all the 'lift and drag' red tape, or the names for motors and stuff, but you have to see past that to see how good I am. I tried a flight simulator once and I crashed it, but that's not related to flying. Here's a picture of an idea I had to show you what a great pilot I am."

 

I have matter doing something along these lines-

''Ionic polarization is polarization caused by relative displacements between positive and negative ions in ionic crystals (for example, NaCl).

If a crystal or molecule consists of atoms of more than one kind, the distribution of charges around an atom in the crystal or molecule leans to positive or negative. As a result, when lattice vibrations or molecular vibrations induce relative displacements of the atoms, the centers of positive and negative charges are also displaced. The locations of these centers are affected by the symmetry of the displacements. When the centers don't correspond, polarizations arise in molecules or crystals. This polarization is called ionic polarization.''

 

Did you need instructions to ride a bike?

 

Helium and hydrogen

''Ferroelectricity is a property of certain materials that have a spontaneous electric polarization that can be reversed by the application of an external electric field''

 

gravity in general this -
by thermodynamics and radiation

'Paramagnetism is a form of magnetism whereby certain materials are attracted by an externally applied magnetic field, and form internal, induced magnetic fields in the direction of the applied magnetic field. In contrast with this behavior,diamagnetic materials are repelled by magnetic fields and form induced magnetic fields in the direction opposite to that of the applied magnetic field''

 

Consider if the sun contains all this energy/electrical energy, I am quite certain there is Faraday's electromotive force created by the sun.

You know the invisible force around a wire, the invisible force that you call gravity.

Is that why my wires always tangle at the back of my television when there is several wires?

 

All planets and suns have cores , all planets have electromotive force, all cores repel cores , all matter attracted to cores, makes sense to me.

 

Science isn't like riding a bike. Nor is flying.

But let's take your example. "I am an excellent bike rider. I don't understand how handlebars work, or how you can ride without falling over. I tried it once and broke my arm. I don't know the names of any of the parts of a bike, but I think they have wheels and gears and a balancer. Probably a big gyroscope or something. Here's a picture of what I think a bike is."

Would you take that "bike rider" seriously?

 

You're just getting more and more insane.

 

I see your point , but when the diagram has got a big yellow representation of the Sun in it , do you not think that shows the intent?

 

Answer the question then, are you saying the Sun does not have electromotive force, the Faraday find would suggest so.

 

But again, you are stating things that are incorrect that anyone with a tiny amount of science background would KNOW are incorrect. Like that gyroscope balancer that all bicycles must have, it indicates the author has no idea what they are talking about.

 

The author knows what he is talking about because the author can picture the invisible swirling electro motive force called Em radiation.

 

The orbits are this, the galaxies are this, the whole universe is this.

''In electromagnetic induction, emf can be defined around a closed loop as the quotient of electromagnetic work that would be done on an charge if it travels once around that loop, and the charge.[3] (While the charge travels around the loop, it can simultaneously lose the energy via resistance into thermal energy.) For a time-varying magnetic flux linking a loop, the electric potential scalar field is not defined due to circulating electric vector field, but nevertheless an emf does work that can be measured as a virtual electric potential around that loop.[4]''

 

EM radiation is not electromotive force (EMF.) The author does not know what he's talking about.

 

No, this is wrong, and you are misquoting...

When all the rational answers have been found (ergo, the rational questions have been answered), then we will know everything. That will, quite likely, never come to pass - there is no reason to delve into irrational thought.

The quote I believe you are looking for:

"You will not apply my precept," he said, shaking his head. "How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth? We know that he did not come through the door, the window, or the chimney. We also know that he could not have been concealed in the room, as there is no concealment possible. When, then, did he come?"
The Sign of the Four, ch. 6 (1890)
Sherlock Holmes in The Sign of the Four (Doubleday p. 111)

 

It is electromagnetic

The hidden passage way hidden under the chest of draws in the corner.