How come there's no clear high quality image or video of a UFO infront of the camera

Discussion in 'Free Thoughts' started by Joaquin, Feb 16, 2015.

  1. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    Therefore what , French air defence , shadow capability follows ...Not
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    Why, what are you an expert on? Authentic UFO footage?
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    Yours really
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Really?
    Could you point out an example of my ignorance on the subject?
     
  8. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    What?
    A stationary aerial vehicle over the centre of Paris and the Adl'A can't circle round it?
    You base this "assessment" on what, exactly?
     
  9. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Whats the speed and maneuverability of UFOs ?
     
  10. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    I have no idea what that question has to do with anything I said.

    And your question is irrelevant and somewhat silly [1].
    How fast was that "UFO" travelling in that video?
    What manoeuvres was it doing?

    1 What's the speed and manoeuvrability of a plane?
     
  11. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    What's more likely?

    a) One person saw a UFO above Paris, and recorded it, without it becoming an overnight mega-news story (including reporters from every news station in the world, along with every government and military organization in the world) across the entire planet will be talking about for the next forever.

    b) You've fallen for a hoax.
     
  12. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    I was pointing out your ignorance on the subject , to your question posted by you #24
     
  13. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Nope.
    You were maybe TRYING to do so.
    Thus far you haven't actually done it.

    For your question to have ANY relevance you'd have to show that "UFOs" ARE aircraft/ aerospace vehicles (as opposed to something else).
    Admittedly, some "UFOs" turn out to un/ misidentified "ordinary" aircraft - but only after they've been positively identified by type can a speed and "manoeuvrability" (whatever you mean by that) be given.
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    So your ignorance continues
     
  15. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Once again you haven't shown this.
    Please provide specific examples as opposed to vague generalisations.
     
  16. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    So how much do you know about standard aviation practice concerning airspace over the French capital, river?
     
  17. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    What does it matter ?
     
  18. Daecon Kiwi fruit Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,133
    If you want people to take your opinions seriously, you have to at least imply that you know what you're talking about.
     
  19. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Well for one thing you made a (nearly) specific claim here:
    and here
    and here
    Can you back any of those up with YOUR knowledge?
     
  20. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    can you backup anything you said about the ability for the French Air Force to " shadow " UFOs ?
     
  21. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Ah, I see you've taken to avoiding questions AND previously made points.

    I'll try again:
    A stationary aerial vehicle over the centre of Paris and the Adl'A can't circle round it?
    How fast was that "UFO" travelling in that video?
    What manoeuvres was it doing?
     
  22. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    it doesn't matter , my point is based on your post # 24
     
  23. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    It does matter.
    You have claimed that I'm ignorant.
    You have yet to show that.
    Or are you somehow claiming that the French air force can't manage to have jets circle a nearly-stationary aerial object?

    You have made specific claims (or nearly-specific [1] ones) that you have failed to provide ANY justification for.

    1 Because a standard tactic of yours is to make things as vague as possible - presumably to give yourself some wiggle room and be able to claim that a refuted point isn't exactly what you meant.
     

Share This Page