The conference hall debate!

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by theorist-constant12345, Feb 20, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,549
    Since you're banned, I guess I'll play. *ahem*

    What?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Was a sockpuppet of a perma-banned member - pay him no mind

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    TC - you keep saying that people can convince themselves of what you are saying in spite of what science says... you DO realize that you are, in essence, asking them to ignore logic and reason in favor of a crack-theory, right?
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2015
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    Uh, TC surely, not MR (in this thread at least).
    I see the similarities, but ...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Dywyddyr Penguinaciously duckalicious. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    19,252
    No.

    Equally no.
     
  8. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    My mistake - fixed. Dealing with MR in another thread... guess it's force of habit at this point... honestly, doesn't matter... trying to make sense of either is bout as useful as... well...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    To the contrary , I am asking them to use their own logic in favour of a naiveness of present thought, I am asking them to rational think about the present information that lead me to conclude my idea.


    A few weeks ago according to you all , I had nothing but gibberish, of late yourself suggested I have a theory, others suggests a hypothesis, others are understanding the idea.
    The idea is gaining strength, because the idea has merit because it is being understood.
     
  10. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Force does not make pressure? please explain
     
  11. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    I use the word "theory" loosely... you have no actual evidence to back what you are saying up except some strange utterances... the idea has no merit because it has no basis in reality or science.

    “The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson
     
  12. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    My truths are the reality , my science is using your science to show reality, I have provided lots of true observations about the process.

    “The good thing about science is that it's true whether or not you believe in it.” ― Neil deGrasse Tyson''


    That is a false statement, if that were true then science would of never changed from history. Not everything is true, it is only science until something better comes along, my observations are true reality, I observe the nature of ''light'', you have perceived I have reality.
     
  13. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    It's still gibberish with no merit, tc. Accept it.
     
  14. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    Gibberish yet people understand it, science has no merit with the gibberish members quote of present information,

    I asked you all the frequency of ''white light'', the replies were from a low end to a high value, not the singular we observe,not an answer, and you speak of truths, why not just say we do not know the frequency of ''white light'' but we know some of the frequencies we can invent from it.
     
  15. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    You do not desire knowledge, and you shun science; you have no idea of the basic principles of the world, yet you claim mastery over how the universe works. You are, quite simply, delusional, and without a prayer in the world.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    You have my pity.
     
  16. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    Insert mr. T's most famous quote here.
     
  17. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    White light consists of a mix of frequencies.

    I assume you have eaten bread. What is its ingredient?

    We know all the frequencies that make up white light.
     
  18. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    Force is simply force. Pressure is force applied to an area, usually via a gas or liquid.
     
  19. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Indeed, an apt comparison... I'm curious how he will avoid this question.
     
  20. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    No, waterfalls spread out quite a bit when they have time to do so; look at any tall waterfall to understand this.
    No, there are waves in the middle of the ocean. Go on any boat to understand this.
     
  21. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    I think he is confusing a "wave" and a "crest" - a wave can, typically, only crest as it approaches shore or other shallow area, as the top of the wave continues to move while the bottom slows.
     
  22. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    I think he's confused in general or a major troll.
     
  23. theorist-constant12345 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    2,660
    The same as a light wave propagates .
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page