This History Will Be

end of #318 should be 10*-34, or 10*-36.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Is that supposed to mean anything?

I'm starting to suspect that JJM is actually a word-salad-bot.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I suggest he consider entering politics verbosity is an art well treasured in that calling.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

do strings in an accelerating particle, compress? of course when ke pp' is directly/inversely proportional to coupling energy density. does that mean retrieving 'strings' from accelerating mass? while the mass is accelerating? the higher the velocity then the higher the compression on the 'strings'? and the ke square as mass. what additive can cause release and be controlled in release volume energy density, in an enclosed area.?

 

#202 Since you haven't read this site or the cesspool and worked out the math and morphology, keep your subjects to your intelligence. Don't slip on your banana peel.

 

No.

Something cannot be both directly AND inversely proportional at the same time!

No.

No.

No.

Kinetic energy squared is not mass. Hint: mass does not have the units of \(kg^2\frac{m^4}{s^4}\)

None.

 

do you appreciate special relativity, faster the more massive with the ke in a geometrical pattern. manipulate that pattern as its' resonance s' approaches light speed. release some of that ke and et.al.

 

central, inter and intra galactic bhs' and super massive bhs' are impact momentum spheroids from collision (and or) friction (and or) motion of 'dm' (+-size). now the interesting part of this is that, are there differences in bh for either collision or friction and motion only. are there differences measurable in the way they formed? What difference could and do exist ..geometry/stylistically. cannot gr resolve geometry?

 

Are you addressing me?

You speak to "202" which was the number of posts I had made.

If you are addressing me may I ask what are you talking about you are far from being clear.
If you are not addressing me go back to what you are doing.

Alex

 

post #325 is for #323.

 

Origin; are you saying that the bond of strings is stronger within rigidity than within a relativistically accelerated particle and the string would be unaware of the motion, because the ke*2 density is not strong enough to 'disturb' the string.?.....right, inversely would mean a negative kepp', so by definition it must be directly proportional. Would or could there be a release by the LHC?.....since I suggest that string is a by-product from collision pressure density resonance strain-stress compression.....strain-stress in the electric and magnetic coupling also can produce 'particle s''......that's another humdinger, releasing that bond.

 

you know that a particle travelling at .99999 of light speed has as much mass as can be found in a fourth ton of rock.

 

I apologize about the 'banana peel'.......How about working on potential shielding for exhaust-thrust. What will do the job? #329. Work out the basics, algorithms......differing forms of ftl may not have that problem. As for this site for me, it is a continuation of the cesspool #10 compressed compression pressure density as gravity density.

 

It would be nice for people to recognize some basics so that their measurements are more accurate.....mass collides with mass, angular momentum collides with angular momentum, curvi-linear momentum collides with curvi-linear momentum (trajectory), each develops an exact geometry, each is a part of the whole, as the whole is the whole, as one varies then the others' will also.... A question.....since strings et.al. oscillate, and they are located in space-time mass density which has an electric-magnetic moment, then does the movements create frequency'ies' by interaction? That surely would be a strong 'back-ground' total......?use a magnifying lens?

 

as to my last post #334......they are not equal, close to but not exact, in fact close to might be stretching it a bit too much. The colliding masses may have differences in density, angular moment(speed and geometry),trajectory (speed and angle) variances, (remembering that any collision off of 180* is that amount of a friction mass(with its' masses and forms within its' geometry/stylistically)). The collision angle is relative to the surface geometry of the object, that dictates the mechanical geometrical flow pattern in the forming object's.......compressed compression pressure density objects geometrically/stylistically......

 

taking time to record, Hubble Space Telescope shows us the 'first light' of objects close to the beginning....it also receives the objects' gravity. It would be most comfortable if someone would measure that. Math will give first order distance divided by (gravity+light speed)*2 (i.e. to and from source observer). From source to observer the distances decrease light and gravity energy density. Why? There is a limit to the mechanical strength density at formation. Then it must be radiating in some fashion over distance. Now that could be interesting, capture of the radiations from gravity and 'light' and all of everything which has any style of radiation's'......again that 'point' is size space-time within which everything, mostly so, is travelling through, at least within that size volume/dimension......

 

#336 from the smallest possible as a size point for material that flows through that area means: is there a 'back-up-geometrical' variation on/at that area? Can lights' geometry be influenced by the field tensors of atomic layers of material? If so, then that could be interesting for the slit in that the light varies by the 'sides' of the hole through which the light travels, as well as directly contouring the light when passing through. So change by field interactions from atomic layer(slit composition), and 'compressing-bending' by size of hole. i.e. light being forced into a new volume-area shape.

 

I just made this post so that it doesn't look like you are talking to yourself.

 

The computer has given a new avenue to communicate that is more powerful than anything else before it, for us common people. Individually each can teach. Whether or not that classroom will respond is ir-relevant, for the truth of the knowledge overrides all beliefs and only object measure is the cloths' weave. For some will see and understand and those that do will have a new influence to add to comprehensions. It becomes a simple sentence in formula. It allows one to view with a new prejudice, though what does that say about objective measure? It is only when the measure is accepted as true that it becomes added to, and becomes new dogma......So my walls reverberate my sound and becomes resonances in my mind.

 

How about some videos showing atmospheric 'pressure' events. Background, mid ground, near ground, here ground. In each and every frequency possible. Look at the forming events in the lateral-ness of boundary. With the proper freq's combined, historical evolution of event can be discerned in that temp, pressure, mass, volume, elasticity, geometry (what and how formed) etc. are all available for fun and excitement. 'Listen to it and look at it and measure it', variable sound speed and pressures. of course with the sensitivity of tpmv. all geometrical, everywhere 360*2.