what about your " cannot travel vast distances " remarks, which was your argument for non human life existence(aliens), remember, " no evidence"-- and now you leave this comment open-ended, implying that alien life exist.
the message, if you were able to read it, was only, simply, an attempt of insulting me, which is also against the rules. on an usual bases,I am not that pathetic enough to hurry-up to the report button. but i will say, i did hit that report button after my ban was lifted.
if you are going to PM with an abundance of low level minded nonsense, i am going to publicly display it.
You are wrong: I don't contradict myself. I certainly believe that we are not alone as I have stated many times. For the reasons that I have also stated many times...near infinite extent of the universe, near infinite content and the stuff of life being everywhere. But I'm also aware that at this time and at this stage of our existence, we have no conclusive evidence of the Earth having ever been visited, nor any hard evidence of ETL anywhere else. Let me add at this stage, that I believe that could well change within the next decade.
Your confusion continues. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I have said many times, "time and distance are the two great barriers between inter-planetary contact" and that does not imply that there is no other ETL.....it implies that any ETL would find it difficult to cross the many hundreds and and thousands of L/years of space to visit us. And again while I certainly believe we are not alone, I also know that as of this stage, we have no evidence for any ETL. That is pretty clear.
(pad's comments a few post ago)-- " While obviously there is some evidence," http://www.sciforums.com/threads/what-evidence-would-work.156409/page-6#post-3385383 you are erratic pad. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! (shakes head) i can also link you stating more of your erratic-ness on this topic.
Link all you like my friend...... People are able to read... What I said...... While I may have accidentally left out the word "conclusive" in post 227 as follows..... My meaning is well and truly clear in post 226 as follows....... I'm pretty sure you understand what I'm saying, and I'm also pretty sure you are just trying to be pedantic...... But hey! Continue with the links of what you perceive as erraticness .....and we'll all look at it. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
And of course the post you linked to re "some evidence" was in reference to "some evidence" that ET had visited Earth, but no conclusive evidence...you know extraordinary evidence.
comical-- except that is exactly what i did already Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! (shrugs)-- i have no interest for your usual, pathetic, backpedaling post. " we have no evidence for any ETL. " " While obviously there is some evidence," " nor any hard evidence of ETL anywhere else." Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! (shrugs)-- obvious, massive, significance between the three--and again, this is just one example. carry on.
All of this may krash fly in the No, obviously you are out to distort as most trolls do and fail to give the whole quote...:shrug: I omitted one word in one post...Any other misinformation and distortion is your own pedantic fairy tale.....enjoy Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Or why not instead of carrying on with your desperado crap, tell us what you believe? Or let me do it for you. You believe we have been visited. You believe the evidence is conclusive. In fact you believe you are Alien yourself.... Have I got all that correct? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! That just puts you in MR, and river's league. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Congrats, there credibility is certainly worth writing home about. [tic mode on of course]
" And obviously neither have you or MR. While obviously there is some evidence, there is no convincing evidence or extraordinary evidence. " " And of course the post you linked to re "some evidence" was in reference to "some evidence" that ET had visited Earth, but no conclusive evidence...you know extraordinary evidence. " " And again while I certainly believe we are not alone, I also know that as of this stage, we have no evidence for any ETL. " " But I'm also aware that at this time and at this stage of our existence, we have no conclusive evidence of the Earth having ever been visited, nor any hard evidence of ETL anywhere else. " " Have I got all that correct? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! "-- no i have no interest for your usual, pathetic, attempting to manipulated, backpedaling post. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! (shrugs)-- obvious, massive, significance between the four--and again, this is just one example. carry on.
" That just puts you in MR, and river's league. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Congrats, there credibility is certainly worth writing home about. [tic mode on of course] "-- i have no clue why they are involved within your pathetic, attempt to manipulate post. (shrugs)
Demonstrably false. If you did not care, you would not have mentioned it. Yet you did, in an attempt to back up your statements with apparent authority. Let's get back on topic. The topic is about evidence; it is not about members, or members' opinions of members.
no, you just cannot grasp why i stated it. ( shrugs) i am only, simply, responded to the notifications i am receiving. overall, i have had enough of this site for some days. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! carry on.
my career consist of me being briefed on of what i work on. no, i was the one who was doing the interview. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! (shakes head)--funny. incorrect
Correct....And while most of us agree ETL should exist elsewhere, most of us also agree that there is no conclusive evidence to validate that claim as yet, and most certainly no conclusive evidence to suggest that any ETL has visited Earth. That's about the gist of it.