Love included...

No

Not read you

Read post yes

See word - process word - understand word - move onto next word

Repeat until no more words - string words together in sequence

Understand sequence = NO

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

If by "read you" you mean do I have a clue what you are asking for, then no... no I do not. Sorry

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Have you written 1×10×2×10×3×10×4×10 (and calculated the answer?)

If you do not it is inevitable you cannot understand what I'm saying.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

1×10×2×10×3×10×4×10 = 240,000

I'm still not understanding what you are saying...

 

Did any of those combinations produce artificial intelligence?

 

Er, not that I'm aware of... how would/should a math problem produce artificial intelligence?

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/6pv49l/researchers_shut_down_ai_that_invented_its_own/
https://www.fastcodesign.com/90132632/ai-is-inventing-its-own-perfect-languages-should-we-let-it

Might be worth a read?

 

Early computers were calculators. They still are today. Not one out of every possible calculation produced artificial intelligence. Do you believe such a theory will remain forever due to this?

 

I don't believe artificial intelligence is as simple as a series of math problems. Logic processes will be a requirement for any sort of AI to function.

 

...but wouldn't such logic gates use the operators shown above (+×÷-)?

 

They would use many operators, not just mathematical.
The common logic gates of OR, AND, NOR, NAND, XOR would be examples of some.
But a linear mathematical equation will never produce AI in the same way that a single molecule of water is not wet.

 

Logic gates still use mathematical operators.

 

The problem is, you are basically trying to say that a single molecule of carbon cannot produce life, thus carbon based life forms are impossible.

 

A single molecule? I (and hopefully you too) have tried ALL possibilities...

 

You have tried every possible numeric combination, up to infinity? I would wager that would take a while...

 

Yeah, yeah, tell me that again...

 

Counter, people are trying to oblige your attempt to get an answer to whatever question it is you are asking. Can you meet them partway and write more than a single contextless sentence at a time?

It's as if you're hoping that everyone is just waiting around to be inspired by the concepts you are raising, and all you have to do is give them a nudge in the right direction, and they'll do all your work for you.

If you have an idea, and you want to explore it, do some work to explore it, instead of fobbing the work off on others.

Your subject line has nothing to do with your opening post, or any other post.
Your opening post is simply an exercise in playing with numbers - it makes no attempt to explain why it might be interesting to examine.
Your subsequent posts drift off into non sequiturs about artificial intelligence and logic gates.

It's not that I'm saying there is no connection; it's that I'm saying you have an obligation to communicate those connections effectively, and you are not doing so.

Have some respect for your readers; they are trying to respect you.

 

I'm slowly starting to think that either there is a massive language barrier in play, or something else entirely...

 

I already have a job.

 

I... don't recall anyone claiming otherwise? This seems like another non sequitur to me...

Honestly, given that nobody has a bleeding clue what you are talking about at this point, I am wondering what the point of this thread even is anymore... can you please try and explain just what, exactly, it is you want us all to do?