Towards Ideas on a Quantum Theory of Gravity

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by Geon, Aug 25, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. NotEinstein Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,986
    Too bad, because I actually did mean it. But alas, onwards to investigating "part two" (if the gods permit)!
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    I think this farce has gone on long enough... at the very least, this is certainly not physics, and belongs in pseudoscience.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Geon Registered Member

    Messages:
    190

    On what grounds?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Geon Registered Member

    Messages:
    190
    I will argue, this is not mainstream physics, but to say it belongs in pseudoscience, is intellectual dishonesty.

    No one who has challenged this seems to be able to do so coherently - NotEinstein has demonstrated repeatedly he does not understand the physics or the math.

    So what grounds do you have Kittamaru?
     
  8. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    For starters - you cannot simply add and remove characters from an equation at will and expect others to follow you. Your attitude has been, at best, simply abysmal in this thread. Not to mention you are a dead ringer for a sockpuppet, both in content and phrasing of posts. At this point, I've tossed it up the ladder to get additional input on it.
     
  9. NotEinstein Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,986
    Says the person that had to be pointed to a missing minus-sign multiple times before he even considered it needing to be there. Says the person that started tensor-ing scalars because of what you claim is a perfectly good and understandable notation.

    But let's look at your ability to do physics then. At least try, because I've seen you do so little of it so far.

    Even there you still mess up copy pasting. I know that's not a direct quote, because I wouldn't call Christoffel symbols "Gamma matrices", because:
    1) they are not matrices;
    2) that term refers to Dirac matrices.
    Now before you say this is not a misunderstanding of physics: it's a total disregard for clearly communicating physics, and connecting the two literally just because they use the same Greek letter (not even the same capitalization!) is, as you would say, laughable. So I wonder... is this your confusion that lead you to try to connect commutator relations to Christoffel symbols? I may be onto something here!
     
  10. Geon Registered Member

    Messages:
    190


    Add and remove what characters?

    You want people to follow me, but you put my work in pseudoscience, which is more or less trying to publically denounce my work, no?

    You leave my thread to have progress up till this point, but now you act like some kind of authority on the matter? I was doing quite well before you butted in, thanks.
     
  11. Geon Registered Member

    Messages:
    190
    The mistakes NonEinstein has made have been embarrassing and people may have been learning something, before you came in here with your big boats on, Kittamaru.
     
  12. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    *shrugs* Continue with your petty insults all you want - if you actually had any sort of factual point to make, you would have made it. As it is, you are just blowing smoke (again).

    Your running away from someone pointing out perceived errors, instead of proving yourself correct with some sort of evidence, just nails it home.
     
  13. Geon Registered Member

    Messages:
    190

    I have made loads of factual points ... none of which you seem interested in.
     
  14. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Then why are you so terrified of someone challenging them?
     
  15. Geon Registered Member

    Messages:
    190
    Kittimaru, these are not insults - I have asked you on what grounds you put it here - can you even answer that? You said in my other post, it was being revisited then shut my other post down like a little bitch.

    They are not insults, its how it is.
     
  16. NotEinstein Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,986
    A perfect example of Orwellian notation!

    Geon, why are you typo-ing my and Kittamaru's names (and only our names) all of a sudden?
     
  17. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Sorry Reiku/SimonsCat/Trapped and the handful of other handles you have gone by over the months, but I don't really give enough of a fuck to argue with you.

    As such, consider this locked as well, pending review by the rest of the moderation team.
     
    origin and exchemist like this.
  18. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    Admin note: Geon has been banned from sciforums as one more sock puppet of an ex-member who has been banned several times previously.

    To Geon/Reiku: you would do better to learn some physics rather than pretending to be an expert. You're wasting your own time and the time of other people on forums like this.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page