Does time slow down?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Dylan, Oct 11, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Dylan Banned Banned

    Messages:
    58
    Please kind sirs, I have read some of the relativity. I have read time slows down, does time slow down?

    In what context do you mean by time slows down? Do you mean like a record playing at a slow speed or something else?
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,451
    All observers anywhere in the Universe in any inertia reference frame experience 1.855e+43 tP's/second because c is constant. My clock is very accurate.

    In time dilation theory and the Lorentz length contraction, this is not accounted for, the shorter slower time being exactly that, a short measurement that has not travelled 1.855e+43 tP's/second .

    If we set the speed of time by using Δt=

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    =c we have synchronous time always and all observers count at the same speed and values always.

    So if instead of using the Caesium clock to measure time, if two observers were to use Planck light clocks, both observers at relative rest or in relative motion measure time to be synchronous. The atomic clocks aboard your aeroplanes being shown to be malfunctioning and a variate measuring device, by both the Planck light clocks constant tick frequency remaining synchronous.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Dylan Banned Banned

    Messages:
    58
    Thank you kind sir for your explanation, I do not understand your maths but as a DJ I understand slower or faster rotations (rpm) of the records. I can understand that a slower played record will travel less rotations per minute than a record played at a faster speed. Is this what you mean by time slows down kind sir?
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    I was just musing about Constant Theorist who was banned because he was so stupid (possible major head trauma?) that we were surprised he was even able to type. It was so sad how he came back several times as a sock puppet trying to be an asshole but only succeeding in making an absolute fool of himself. It must really suck to be that stupid. But anyway, I didn't want to derail the thread so carry on my fine fellow.

    I hope you have better luck in learning a little science in this thread than the last!
     
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2017
  8. Dylan Banned Banned

    Messages:
    58
    Thank you kind sir for your reply although I have no idea what or who you are on about. I did learn several things in the other thread, mainly kind sir, that you do not have all the answers.
     
  9. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    It is not important, he was just this silly little clown that floundered around for a while and we all got a good laugh at his antics. We banned him because his presence cause a large decrease in the in the average IQ of the site. When he was banned it was estimated that the average IQ of the site increased by 9.8 points.
    Really? That was all you got out of that exchange? Sorry to here that my fine fellow.

    You could have simply asked does science have all of the answers and we could have told you the answer is no.

    The saddest part is that you seemed to have not understood that answers that are known...
     
  10. Dylan Banned Banned

    Messages:
    58
    Thank you kind sir for your reply. Please respectfully reply in the other thread on the unanswered questions. I learnt in the other thread several things, but please kind sir answer the missing answers. I will post the questions again in that thread that have not been answered with great respect kind sir.
     
  11. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    You need to learn some basic science my fine fellow to hope to understand these more difficult concepts. I suggest that you work on some basic understanding in science and then I would be glad to help you, as it stands now this is just beyond your ability.

    Don't fret you can learn this, it's not like you are that trump (fucking moron [as defined by the Secretary of State]) Constant Theorist!

    Good luck on your endeavors.
     
  12. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,451
    That poster, under the name Antoine, actually gave up on another forum, with these words:

    "You win , being ignorant and ignoring me will make me see sense in that this forum is pointless for me . I request a ban and will not return as a sock. I have also requested all other science forums ban me that I am on, I have wasted my life trying to correct science with no gratitude or even proper listeners.

    Thank you for at least not being a-holes and allowing me to post on here, but will no discussion I am wasting my time .

    I wish you good day and good luck in the future,

    Regards
    Steve"

    (We "won" by not banning him but relegating him to a corner of the site where he was ignored. And he has been silent until this very day, actually.)
     
  13. Dylan Banned Banned

    Messages:
    58
    Thank you kind sir I will take your advice. What basics do you suggest I start at please kind sir?
     
  14. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    Go to the reference section of the library and find any text book that is an introduction to science. Good luck.
     
  15. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    Sockpuppet of previously banned member once more removed... with great respect I await his inevitable return.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page