We never went to the moon.

He'd send them to the moon

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

"One of these days!!!!"

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Proof.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Ah, the halcyon days when spouse abuse was funny.

 

I'm not getting this Bells? Ok, I can see why your asking FF for no more dodgy links, but the ''And stop trolling'' part?
What is FF doing differently now, for a mod to call it trolling? When did you first notice FF was trolling?

Anyways, as long as FF or anyone else isn't rude to others, they can say and cut & paste what they want. That's how this site works isn't it? The site puts the choice on posters whether to participate in a thread. Bells, stop rocking the boat, people want the fringe section to stay as it is, remember the poll and the majority for ''Leave things as they are'':

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/request-for-input-subforums-and-mission-statement.160267/

Mods like the other folk here are under no obligation to stick around.

 

Thanks for the support sweetpea.

Can someone point out something specific that I posted that can be considered trolling? We can talk about whether it's really trolling.

The attempts of this pro-Apollo poster (Betamax) to discredit me is continuously referred to in this thread.

http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-7#post-3333987
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-12#post-3389973
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-13#post-3390380
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-15#post-3391337
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-16#post-3391358
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-17#post-3391585
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-17#post-3391742
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-17#post-3391743
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-18#post-3391823
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-22#post-3475246
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-23#post-3475262
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-23#post-3475275
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-23#post-3475300
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-23#post-3475340
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-24#post-3475357
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-25#post-3475705
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/we-never-went-to-the-moon.145207/page-26#post-3475765


I stopped at page #26.

I think this guy's credibility is a legitimate issue that should be discussed. I have debated that person over at Political forum. I linked to where he said something that showed him to be either a paid sophist or an idiot and the post got deleted. He insists that the movement of the flag shown here...

-------------------------------
At the thirty second mark in this clip the astronaut moves the flag from right to left.


The flag flutters the way it would in a medium such as water.
-------------------------------


...is in the vacuum of space. Here's another link to where he says the same thing.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/moon-minerals.305043/page-2
(page #2 post #23)

His stand on that amomaly totally discredits him and anyone who doesn't simply say that water caused that flag to move has no credibility. All of the pro-Apollo posters here seem to agree with him so they have no credibility. Am I doing anything wrong here? I think this constitutes my winning the debate. Why am I being called a troll?

 

Impenetrable.

 

You have a very very low standard of winning

Charle Sheen has higher credibility with his winning

You seem to be trying to convince someone who just bought a million tons of mixed nuts (all the different aspects of the space program) that a few of the nuts (two or three are not really nuts)

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Do you agree with Betamax?

I've linked to a summary of hoax proof.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...andings-ever-happened.512081/#post-1067871432

The guy who "Debunked" that info has no credibility.

I can post the list here instead of linking to it if linking to it isn't kosher.

 

I "debated" someone on that forum on who should get the credit for General Relativity. He, argued and linked something (which I didn't read) that Nicola Tesla should be credited and not Einstein. When I pressed him he said it was all about fudging the math that Einstein is given credit. To which I remarked that for over a century scientists have been fudging the math?

He was content with his "winning debate". I was content in not caring.

 

Tell us whether you agree with what he said about the flag in water. He said is was in a vacuum. What's your view?

 

I can't say I care, but am curious as to how you use your powers of deduction in other areas.

 

This either makes or breaks him. How can you not care?

 

Go to your local swimming pool

Take a flag and waterproof video camera oh and a space suit

Duplicate the "fake flag waving" underwaer movement

Post here when ready. See those who claim fake give nothing to compare

Be the ground breaking first. Think of the books to be sold with a underwater flag waving you on cover

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I'm more interested in my hair and coffee ATM.

 

Thank you for not mentioning breathing gear. : popcorn:

 

In 1972 Richard Nixon was re-elected by a landslide despite Watergate looming on the horizon. One commentator suggested that America had chosen a smart crook over an honest fool.

Ever since then, when somebody insists he's an honest fool and not a smart crook, I take his word for it.

 

a

No. You were not trolling, you were just mindlessly spamming Hope that helps.

You discredit yourself with your woefully inept opinions about flags in space and a huge list of face palming observations. The fact that you can't even see this makes it even worse.

Nothing you posted puts his credibility in doubt. That thread you linked to is a systematic annihilation of your daft claims. You got publicly mauled and again are completely incapable of even noticing it.

It is off topic crap, as it is here! Your opinion about him or Windley is nothing more than that. YOUR OPINION!

My god man! Are you absolutely crazy? Flags don't move like that in water. As has been exhaustively pointed out to you, there is no shimmering of light, evidence of any currents that create rippling and no evidence of resistance to motion that causes the flag to align with direction of movement and billow.

How in any sane world can you not see this? Your argument is so stupid it speaks volumes about you as a person. You make it even worse by claiming the guy who points out this blindingly obvious thing, has no credibility. If I didn't know your internet spamming history, I would assume that THAT was the trolling bit, because nobody could be that foolish to claim it was in water. Yet here you are pounding your mad spam drum!

Firstly, there is nothing anomalous about the footage. It is a flag being twisted by a man in space. You are as far from "winning the debate" as it is humanly possible to be.

It is futile arguing with such insanity. It's also nothing to do with the damn Moon landings!

 

So, "garbage truck" rather than "troll". Acceptable.