Like I wrote. Trolling. Mathematical cosmology is religion. It makes bold claims without it being logical deduction. Heaven is made of infinites and here logical deduction begins. Not with a neutron or a proton like Einstein did. Einstein cosmology isn´t logical deduction and if you claim it is then you´re forgetting about the infinites which mathematics cannot do. And if you cannot see logical then you see flawed. Mathematical cosmology is pseudo science. I explain the infinite large in the post above and in my book I also explain the infinite small. I´m being honest but it probably doesn´t live up to your expectations of what is true or not because you´re with religious cosmology thus mathematical cosmology.
Have you ever stopped and wondered why everyone seems like a troll to you. When it seems like the rest of the world is wrong or stupid and you are the only smart or correct one, then just maybe it is time to step back and rationally look at your position
Basically you are telling me to back off because you cannot handle the truth of my logic. Thats not how honesty works. When your honest you may say it.
You write like a religious cosmology preacher fighting logic. And when you cannot beat the logic you make yourself look big like a gorilla. You aren´t the whole world you should realize this. If logic makes you feel uncomfortable then perhaps you should think rationally and realize you have been living a lie. Science must obey to logical deduction first. Feelings you have about science come later.
What the hell is a religious cosmology preacher? I did read a small amount of your writing and I detected no logic. What was that you said about trolls and personal attacks? I do realize that. I am fine with logic - there is no logic in your writing, just rambling and made up words. Not sure what you are trying to say, I guess that English is not you first language.
Logic takes thinking which takes a bit of effort and honesty. And if you're going to be honest you read the whole post to see the logic in it.
Maybe, I write real science based on logical deduction beginning where its supposed to begin with. Infinites and not finites. Seems many scientists today overlooked this reality when they went to math school.
I read enough to clearly see it is rambling pseudoscience. I have no interest to read more. You can comfort yourself by believing that we are all just not smart enough to perceive your genius. I am out this, it is a waste of time.
Infinites are not pseudo science. They are the root of cosmology. You believe in pseudo science made of finites and no logical deduction. Its okay your leaving because you should actually read a post before arguing it. But you argued before you knew what you were up against and now your walking. The courtesy on forums is that you read the post and stay on topic. Enjoy your day.
word "heaven" used 120 times word "meulens" used 291 times how is this supposed to make sense ? you obviousely did not proof read your own writing. i would guess that your soo wrapped up in holding on to an idea in your mind that you loose track of what your actually typing, so you type something different from what your thinking, and loose track of the fact that someone can only read your words, not your mind. are you writing this as an exercise for bible class on divine creation ? you really must proof read and grammar check your work.
Honestly I have clinical depression and I did not read his wall of text either. I need catchy intro paragraphs to overcome my ADHD. But I will try to go back and read at least one of his wall of texts, and give my final verdict on whether or not it is rubbish.
OK, that makes sense. I would be as cynical as you if I had your condition(s), which makes it hard to feel positive about the world. I'm only autistic.
I have a bit of autism as well. I tried to read his second paragraph, but then I dozed off. It seems intensely metaphorical, and I have no idea what a "muelen" is.