Here is James Clarkson's letter upon leaving, not directly because of lack of evidence but because of lack of integrity - it has become a money-making organization at the cost of its investigative integrity: http://jamesclarksonufo.com/ufo-news/with-regret-why-i-must-leave-mufon-completely An account of Rich Hoffman. leaving because of " the blatantly unscientific nature of this year's Symposium, and his concern that MUFON keeps moving farther away from genuine scientific investigations" https://badufos.blogspot.com/2017/08/mufon-unravels.html and an account of Robert Powell's exit: http://jamesclarksonufo.com/article...on-2017-symposium-and-how-the-show-must-go-on
I wasn't aware. I mean, the best evidence I knew about was from the sex-files... er... X-files, sorry
Are you talking about the probing? We have come a few million light years to find you as a life form We have not invented a McCoy scanner Please bend over and have your waste exhaust say Arrrh Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
How does one abduct a UFO? The main issue would be that when you get close to it identification should be easy, even if the summary is "flying saucer" or "alien spaceship". It's no longer unidentified at that point, thus we have a tautology. (If I used that word right.)
"oxymoron" I think. I always get that pair of antonyms muddled. "tautology" is like a redundancy in the expression.
Something like the net used at the end of runways to help aircraft from running off the end However the net itself does not stop the aircraft The ends are attached to cables which run out to slow down the aircraft, a net by itself would be more like a brick wall Depending on the UFO propulsion system it might help to put pulses of electricity through the net in a attempt to disrupt its drive and / or control systems Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!