No, I am absolutely convinced that the concept of evolutionary processes has been established beyond any reasonable doubt. Any other possible explanation demands much greater complexity than natural universal mathematical processes and are superfluous to the fundamental question of a mathematically emergent and self-expressive universe.
Neither do you. You simply memorise information, then regurgitate it, in an effort to maintain the idea as real. Here is another side to your current delusion. Unless anyone agrees with this religion, despite having academic credentials, or not. Do not know anything about Darwin’s ideas. Quite pathetic really. Jan.
No one can deny science. One kind of creature changinging into a completely different kind of creature, is not scientifically verified. Slight modification over time, for the purposes of adaptation is. Show me any theist that denies the latter? Unless they admit that no creature has, over time, transformed itself into an entirely different type of creature (eg: whale evolution), there is no update. It is therefore a belief What’s it got to do with you, how I spend my time? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Anyways let’s get back to discussing religion. Namely yours. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Jan.
No, you are looking at this from the wrong perspective. No one claims that one kind of creature changed into a different kind of creature. The claim is that ALL creatures came from a single biological precursor, and that time and evolution has produced an astounding variety of kinds among species and even some hybrids from once separated kinds. But changing from a hominid precursor into several different families of great apes is not changing kind. It's just changing functional cosmetics, i.e. evolution and natural selection for viability under dynamic local conditions.
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! https://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evograms_03 Read the evolutionary process at left of the tree Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Skeletons of two early whales. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Here, a phylogenetic tree shows how hippos, and cetaceans such as whales and dolphins evolved from a common ancestor https://www.livescience.com/49922-images-hippo-ancestor.html
Who you talking to? You are looking in the wrong place for evidence. Also, who were you posting to in the post before this?
What are you trying to prove? Triceratops did not exist? The fossil skeleton is fake? After 50 million years you expect to find mass graves of dinosaurs? As long as you provide proof of the existence of these creatures you are proving science correct.
Slight modification over a span of 100 years results in major modification over 10 million years. Exactly the same process, exactly the same result. The only difference is the scale. We have proof of this process, and its result. We have fossil and genetic evidence that shows that whales evolved from land animals. Further, we have endless examples of organisms that are in the process of evolving from land animals to aquatic animals.
Yes, you don't have any. I do and I am posting it. Any objection? Don't worry. You're not important enough for me to be concerned whether you read this or not. You have nothing of interest to offer. I have tried to engage you in a civil manner and you refused to even employ normal everyday courtesy, so please stay out of my posts, ok? And another one bites the dust......Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
You won't get away that easily. Your cut and paste pictures prove nothing and it is bad form to assume I didn't know anything about evolution, in truth I've probably read more books on it then you.
He is rejecting the notion that we belong to the family Hominidae. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae In his world there are only monkeys and humans.
