BB is an incomplete theory . A System Universe is more complete.

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by river, Mar 3, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    About zero point one percent (0.1%).
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. river

    Messages:
    17,307

    Interesting

    So in Nuclear power plants , we get 0.1 percent ( 0.1%) of the uranium energy potential ?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    Yup.

    Fission is nowhere near annihilation. Uranium is split into (Krypton and Barium, I think) leaving 99.9% waste products.

    The waste products have a combine mass juuuuuuust slightly less than that of Uranium. The missing mass has been converted to energetic particles.

    If you want to know how much energy is released by a single uranium atom fissing, take the difference of the mass and multiply it by the speed of light squared.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Why square the speed of light ?

    Still don't understand why it is necessary to do so ?
     
  8. dumbest man on earth Real Eyes Realize Real Lies Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,523
    Maybe Krypton and Barium?
     
  9. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    I have no idea what you're talking about!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Neither .
     
  11. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    I was in the middle of a response to your other question about squaring c when this response came in.

    This latest comment leads me to believe that you're not really interested in how this works. That you're going to re-assert your own ideas.
    Is there any point in continuing? Or is this just about you?
     
  12. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Continue
     
  13. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    What are the products of Uranium fission?
     
  14. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Alfa and beta particles .
     
  15. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    And the waste products?
     
  16. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Nuclear decay radiation .

    Lead , in the end .
     
  17. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    So, you don't think Uranium in a nuclear reactor fisses into Krypton and Barium?
     
  18. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    Not so far .
     
  19. Janus58 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,395
    No, not directly. While Uranium fission results in the production of daughter isotopes which are radioactive and thus can decay via Alpha or Beta emission, the actual process of fission does not produce them.
     
  20. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    What does then ?
     
  21. Janus58 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,395
    Then you are wrong. Fission is the process of a nucleus of a particular isotope breaking apart into to smaller parts which each make up a nucleus of a lighter element. The energy released comes from the fact that that the rest mass of the two daughter isotopes, plus that of any free neutrons produced, is less than the rest mass of the original nucleus.
     
  22. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,959
    If you're not going to believe standard science, what is the point in my telling you about c^2?
    Aren't you just wasting my time?
     
  23. river

    Messages:
    17,307
    • The answer to the question that river asks here was answered many times earlier in the thread. This kind of trolling is inappropriate.
    So E=m and m=E is wrong ?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page