Unfortunately I have been victim of some of those scenarios. Have you? What does that have to do with evil? Many evil men are cowards. Trump is one of them. That makes him a Narcissist.
A fearless evil person is usually referred to as a true psychopath. A fearless good person is usually referred to as a hero.
Evil men are not cowardly as they as cautious. Just to be truthful. Trump is not "cautious" relative to evil men.
I have done two heroic deeds. One got me on a naughty list. The other got me strangled. But I always smile in the face of evil. I'm not smiling in this thread. It does not bring me pleasure to teach men how to judge.
Did you have a particular uranium deal in mind? ........... Iran does have uranium mines, and can produce enough for domestic use. Exportation, however, is unlikely. Iran could never compete with Kazakhstan, Canada or Australia.
Uh... Nope. Just make me something nice out of soapstone please. Like a bust. And by that I mean a womans
or: http://home.mindspring.com/imagelib/sitebuilder/misc/show_image.html?linkedwidth=actual&linkpath=http://home.mindspring.com/~mandali/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/lynn.torso.figurative.sculptor.rod.patterson.jpg&target=tlx_new&title=figure sculpture LYNN torso in the clay
The unredacted version is up for a look see. Good thing because only half the people read the first one.
What is the alternative to ... philosophy? There is another reading I can kind of guess on your behalf, but my answer would be, no, that's not philosophy, that's politics. So, yeah, I don't know if that's the right one, either.
No, it isn't. It has not. Essentially, every single declarative statement you have made in this thread is false. It's spelled "lose". And while you are consulting your dictionary, look up "embezzlement" - you don't know what it means. Iran sometimes buys enriched uranium from other countries. Iran does not supply other countries with uranium, enriched or otherwise. You don't make arguments. You simply assert falsehoods. Why are you here, posting silly shit that anyone with an internet connection can check?
was it not front page head line news for some months on end that the key part of the iranian usa anti nuclear deal was that iran would only source enriched uranium from usa nominated countrys for the sole purpose of power production ? several years worth of news was all about iran supposedly having centrifuges which some decades in the future might be capable of producing material... any person interested in discussing the subject would already know this stuff.
Where and when did we hear that argument before? Did the Bush admin not out CIA agent Valerie Plame to the world over the non-existence of uranium sales from Niger? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plame_affair
I believe you meant to say "lose." Huh. I guess we will see, won't we? Nope. It pays for an air conditioner INSTEAD of starving kids. But sounds like you are fine with that. Again, I (and the rest of us) are very thankful you are not in charge of anyone else's money.