As i said, even in this low level of discussion, I am totally out of my ligue. The less I say the better. Although triggering a good correction of wrong ideas is a nice passive achievement.
To your last statement . I find that intelligent discussion is much , much better when it goes past , the past .
Our past, which is rendered non - existent, imho, reaches only to the Big Beginning #4. but Even when you go beyond that near past, into the farther past, or undisturbed time, (one of my favoured pasttimes), then you are in the Pre- Big Bang time, which is a realm of matter-less energy. The subject of this thread. Un - created energy , because Un- created energy has always existed, any discussion of that alleged "past", prior to energy is pointless. imho. Going into the past, the life time of the Universe is ok, catching the photons that are still on the way is revealing, but going past eternal energy could end you in theology, often a deadly subject, often no intelligent discussion there. Chronology, & energyology , beats Theology.
Nebel The physical Universe is about elements , understanding , the periodic table and more . In Russia , Siberia , a craft crashed . The material of the craft changed with temperature . Increased temperature changed the metalic material .
Yes, energy input from the fusion processes forged our elements on the higher periodic table numbers. A win win situations, result of the original energy and matter that came through the Big Bang. and from beyond.
They figured out how to , put , a physical thing into a lattice of the structure . Without disturbing the stability of the fundamental lattice , its self . Fluidity of a structure forms .
E is just a number we generate, not an intrinsic property of photons. p = property of photon, c = property of space. What is E = pc a property of? The electric field doesn't increase but the magnetic field might if the photon adds angular momentum to the particle.
Is talanum46 a sockpuppet of Willem? http://www.thescienceforum.com/pers...deas/49067-constructing-time-four-axioms.html Edit: See this as well: http://sciforums.com/threads/what-is-time.143040/page-53#post-3579181
The plot thickens: http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...m/physics/48930-weak-foce-does-not-exist.html
Oh erm, yeah, look at the last part of that post: Darn it, this sockpuppet-hunting expedition was too easy!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Any way what is energy ? Wave and particle combination . Wave , easy to understand . Particle , beyond the sub-quantum ( below the quantum , the micro, micro world of particles ) . What is there ?