Neurological control understanding .

Discussion in 'Human Science' started by Mark Turner, Jul 16, 2019.

  1. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,854
    Of course, why didn't I think of that...it puts the lotion on its skin. Things suddenly make sense...
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    Neurological sexual dynamics and neurotica are a part of the neurological rewards process . A process that gives humans that feel good factor . Over time though , probably in about our fifties , the rewards process requires different rewards such as comfort .
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    do you consider eating to stay alive be an objective or subjective act ?
    Eating IS voluntary isn't it ? thus governed by objectivity/subjectivity ... ?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,451
    Yeah, it puts the lotion on its skin.
     
  8. Bowser Namaste Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,828
    So, people in general have conversations with their thoughts? That's rather creepy. It's always been an observation from my perspective.
     
  9. Bowser Namaste Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,828
    Not really. But if you can have both, all that much better.
     
  10. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    Its not creepy , It can become a mental issue such as schizophrenia .

    Where neuro simultaneity occurs in ones own mind as opposed to difference reference frames .

    Our minds functionality is not much different than the information on a CD except we can process the information .
     
  11. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    Eating is an involuntary reaction for most people .
     
  12. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    Some people do. Mental health experts refer to that as "responding to internal stimuli." People have entire conversations with an imagined other party.
     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.
  13. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    Nope.
     
  14. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,057
    No it isn't. Thinking outside the box is a whole other thing and you can't do it effectively until you understand the box.
    The way to seek knowledge is by asking the people who have knowledge, not by making it up for yourself.
     
  15. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    how do you choose what to eat ?
    do you just instantly react and eat what ever is in front of you ?
     
  16. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    No; per MT, it's involuntary. That's why so many people eat their keys, their kids, their laptops, their dogs . . .
     
    origin and RainbowSingularity like this.
  17. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  18. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,854
    As Flip Wilson used to say "The Devil made me do it".
     
  19. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    watched a doco on a couple of UK people who had voices in their heads.
    the list of medications ... sheesh
     
  20. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    Doesn't make much sense to me. That just reminds me of The Silence of the Lambs.

    What is this thread about?
     
  21. RainbowSingularity Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,447
    i am alluding to 4 basic things
    1 from a topical position, yes sarcasm while contrasting with the innate nature of psychopathy
    2 the lack of emotional content and interaction by the thread author
    3 the nature of the 3rd person being used by the thread author which implies a heavy sense of lack of empathy or comprehension of the interactive feelings and emotions of human interaction
    4 the lack of connection to the interactive nature of communication, being of an outside sense & the reality of how that relates to the real world human personality model(sociopaths & psychopaths)

    Either
    is having a mental health issue(some define this as a crisis depending on the severity, where as some define it as a transitory process of realisational development)
    or is a Troll trawling for emotionally vulnerable people to prey on.

    where one draws the line between helping a real person in need or enabling a predator(i cant tell which[yet, though i am not soo interested to find out given the statistical chance of them being far more likely to be a predator, equally so with those who may be deemed needing of help, only so far may they be pushed until they feel they are being bullied & you become equal to the problem by trying to be the solution])... is a tricky thing
     
  22. Mark Turner Banned Banned

    Messages:
    350
    I'd disagree as hunger can affectively cause cannibalism , the need to eat because of starvation .
    Neurological simultaneity , what makes sense to me doesn't make sense in your reference frame .
     
  23. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,635
    Nope. Still a conscious choice. Eating is voluntary.
     
    RainbowSingularity likes this.

Share This Page