Pacifism is the only way to be happy. If your saying you get pleasure from violence you would be sadistic.
Pacifism is the only way to be happy There you go again TELLING me the only way to be happy If your saying you get pleasure from violence you would be sadistic. Considering I never gave ANY indication of what makes me happy, BUT YOU jump to me getting pleasure from violence says a lot about your thought processes It seems to be a massive ARROGANCE going on in your brain Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I was asking you what the requirements are to get into heaven in first place, not what heaven is like once you're there. Did you miss that?
YOU are the one who is telling me how to live my life, YOU are the one telling me what to believe, YOU are the one telling me I'll suffer for eternity if I don't follow what YOU are telling me to do. How the fuck is that tolerance? Here is the definition of tolerance, which you obviously don't understand... "the ability or willingness to tolerate something, in particular the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with." If your religion tolerated people, IT WOULDN'T TELL PEOPLE WHAT TO DO AND WOULDN'T THREATEN THEM WITH HELL IF THEY DIDN'T DO IT! Therefore, YOU and your religion are NOT tolerant. Kapeesh?
No I'm not. Sorry??? Again, why is this a problem? It seems that your the intolerant one. If your not happy your in hell, end of story.
Who decides what'' happy''is here, you and your personal understanding of the Bible? Burn Q at the stake. Good old days. In that case, you won't mind going in Q's place.
Your words are there for everyone to see. How can you possibly deny your own words? Because, what you say is intolerant, that's why it's a problem. I'm not the one telling you how to lead your life, or telling you what to believe, nor am I threatening you with eternal suffering, but those are all the things you are telling me. How exactly am I being intolerant? But, you have stated that happiness is what you decide, that to be happy one must have Jesus. That is not happiness for me, so you decided that I am going to hell because my happiness is not your happiness. That's intolerance, end of story.
But, you are the hater here. You hate the fact we don't have Jesus, that we are non-believers so you've decided we will go to hell and suffer for an eternity. That is pure hatred towards others. You are the hater.
What about your sins? What about your hatred and intolerance towards others? Will your sins be atoned?
Then, prove it. Just saying it's false means nothing without a rebuttal. Your own words are all over this thread. Clearly, if you can't show my post is false, then you know it isn't false and you're in denial. Somehow you believe you can just tell people what to do and what to believe, then threaten them with hell and get away with it.
You say '' non-believers'' go to Hell because you think they should believe in your god. That's very intolerant of you Kx000.
Kx000 believes that I am intolerant. If he lives in a free society, then he is free to tell me I need Jesus to be happy and he is free to threaten me with hell if I don't believe as he believes. In other words, society and the law are tolerant of his views. He can freely say these things without any consequences or oppression. This is the protection he receives. Yet, if I tell him I'm not interested in doing what he wants me to do, or believe what he wants me to believe or accepts his threats of hell, then I'm the one who is intolerant. Kx000 does not think I should have the same protection of free speech that he demands and enjoys, that I have no right to deny his demands, that I have no right to question his agenda and that I must simply give in to his threats, or else I'm intolerant. The mindset of this is nothing short of master and slave, where he can enjoy the freedom of making demands on others and then threatening them with the worst kind of punishment if they don't obey. Should we then fight religion? Is there a valid case for it?