Who cares about Iggyed members thoughts? My tally is over 40 and I think in the years of using Iggy have only once used "Show ignored content" I get the gist of discussion from replies Still not make me curious enough to show ignored Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
The threads get ruined, they chase away the worth reading members. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I should say the ''nasty'' one like Q-reeus, that is.
It seems to me Foghorn has a point. I've been enjoying przyk's informative contributions on this thread. He clearly knows GR pretty well. I don't see why you can't have a discussion with him about any perceived misunderstandings without introducing personal unpleasantness.
In your deranged opinion maybe. At very best a product of inability to grasp the details of exchanges prior to your unwelcome intrusion. My responses you ostensibly found objectionable are both accurate and pertinent, but that will be beyond your capacity to grasp. Besides, I think you just enjoy being a pest.
See my last post. I get used to being ganged up on here. Goes with the SF territory. You and sock puppet foghorn could have just waited to see how przyk responded first, instead of jumping in with ill-informed opinions.
My comments on your posting style have nothing to do with anybody's reply. And I am far from the first to make such observations. Look in the mirror.
Yes I understand that My who cares perhaps should have been worded as the selfish version I don't care what he thinks Of course no need to even use Iggy. Just not give any reply to certain persons post Iggy helps by automating the process Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Most everyone perceives a virtuous soul staring back at them in the mirror. That would also include you with little doubt. Enough thread derailing moralizing for one day? No need to answer btw.
My ignoring a certain person (Q-reeus), does not keep an interesting poster here, if that poster is receiving unwarranted hostility from Q-reeus.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Of course, you have to say that. You are never wrong with your insults, and it could never be just your ''deranged opinion'':
Not a single constructive word dealing with gravitation, critical or otherwise, from any of the three hypocrites flaming me here. Not a surprise.
A very ''constructive word'' to use when ''discussing'' gravitation is ''weaselly''. You are such a hypocrite.
RJB has two very interesting threads going over at ''scienceforums net''. Won't give links here, it may be considered bad form linking to another forum's threads. No hostility being allow to spoil the setting of debate there.