Elvis Sibilia's Philochrony theory of everything

Go back to post#37 .

Or posts #33 through to #37 .

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Actually a "measurable property" is an indication of physical existence or potential.

https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Definition: Measurable_Property

Measurement is the process of determining the quantity or value of a measurable property.

I showed an example of gravity, where the relative values of the masses mathematically determine their relative interactive behaviors.

This is Tegmarks whole hypothesis. Every object (atomic or geometric pattern) has an intrinsic mathematical value and therefore allows for measurement and potential for doing work.

His "Mathematical Universe" is based on that proposition and would in theory allow for the conceptualization of a universal TOE.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

To your last statement

So the Universe is fundamentally based on Physical Real Objects . Not nothing .

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The expressed (unfolded) Universe is a physically real object with inherent measurable mathematical values. It also has inherent as yet unmeasured (enfolded) potential values. A mountain lake has an enormous enfolded potential for energy. Electricity generated by a dam is the unfolding of measurable energy.

Hydroelectric Power

https://www.usbr.gov/power/edu/pamphlet.pdf

Human observers are only able to observe a limited range of these unfolded expressed values, such as density of atomic or molecular dispersion.

I have already cited the three different states of physical existence (wetness) of an identical number of H2O molecules.
Compact density = solid (ice). Physical property; hard, dry
Intermediate density = liquid (water). Physical property ; fluid, wet
Highly dispersed density = gaseous (vapor). Physical property ; vaporous, humid

 

And the ability to burn .

To the highlighted

What the Frig does that even mean !!!!!!??

What unFold's for the Universe to Exist .

 

Yes, value or quantity of the property.

 

Define " quantity of the property " highlighted .

 

Weight: Take a book in your hands and lift it.
Length: Look at a pencil.
Time: Do a pause for a moment looking at a clock.

 

To your last statement ; And if I don't look at a clock , all day , week , month ...> ? Then what changes in the things that are going on about me ? To the things themselves .

As opposed to pausing for a look at a clock .

 

I suspect all quantum fields contain enfolded (unmeasurable) potentials, from which unfolded (measurable) values become expressed.
Note; the emergence of a Higgs boson at the CERN collider, which promptly decayed back into simpler constituents.

Quantum Fields: The Real Building Blocks of the Universe - with David Tong

 

I'm , 9:47 minutes into this video , Write4U , I am not impressed .

At , the field is a fluid , 11:17 , and exists throughout the entire Universe .

 

Electric and Magnetic fields exist . Of course they do .

The thing is , is that , neither could exist without a physical source .

 

Wave and Particle have always existed together , always .

If I take either from the other , for example ; could a particle exist without a wave .

 

Have they?
AFAIK, the original plasma state existed before fundamental particles formed during cooling.

Plasma Phase of matter

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

A plasma globe, illustrating some of the more complex plasma phenomena, including filamentation

Yes, collapse the wave function and the physical particle emerges from the field.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)

 

Well, he does take you on a little bit of background history. Personally, I like that because it puts his narrative in perspective.

Yes, I see that more as a chaotic energy field having fluid (wavelike) properties. IMO, this is not quite the same as being a liquid.

David Tong is a quantum physicists, speaking at the Royal Institution, in England.

 

Plasma is ionic .

Yes the Plasma State exists and in the Universe it exists . Hence the Cosmic Web or the Fluid theory of whats happening . I like the Idea of a Fluid , just not sure I like the theory .

I still like the Cosmic Web theory as well .

I mentioned to nebel a little while ago on his thread , the idea of currents existing in our Solar System .

Anyway to have measure the physical must exist first .

Write4U , I haven't given you enough credit for mentioning the Plasma Theory well done

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

.

 

If the Universe is Only made of waves , then the waves never become other than waves and could never build a physical reality . Because the waves could never focus their energy in one place ; example , to produce a Galactic Globular Core . To focus the energy you need a particle , that focuses the energy of the wave .

Waves , in and of themselves can't produce a physical object , and an object in and of its self , can't produce a wave .

 

But that 's incorrect. The double slit experiment proves that particles travel as a wave function. IOW, a travelling particle is smeared out and unfocused. The wave function does not created focused trajectories, the particle is not a particle in that atomic pattern. Look at the ocean, a roiling cauldron of water.

Again, the double slit experiment has proved that waves can and do behave as particles when the wave function is collapsed. Again think of the ocean and the wave breaking on the rocks and a thousand individual droplets are created by the kinetic impact .

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Note that the wave function moves on top of the water, but does not carry any water. The water itself moves in vertical rotation not horizontally as the wave. Yet when the wave collapses on the rocks the water breaks into small individual "particles".

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

It seems to me that a physical particle is no more than a dense pattern of elementary values which acquires mass due to kinetic impact and become expressed as a massive physical object.

Muons: the little-known particles helping to probe the Universe
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05254-2

Isn't it interesting that we experience collision with a photon as light and warmth, but we cannot even experience collision with a muon at all.

http://cms.web.cern.ch/news/muon-detectors

 

↑

Particles travel within the wave . With density . It is what gives mass to a wave .

 

That's the crux of the problem.....

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!