Yeah and not before time!Finally!![]()
Yeah and not before time!Finally!![]()
river said: ↑
Its not about belief pad , its about the science data .
Sure, sure river!![]()
https://www.google.com/search?q=del...33j0i20i263.3423j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8What I say above is true pad .
https://www.google.com/search?q=del...33j0i20i263.3423j1j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
delusional:
- characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument, typically as a symptom of mental disorder.
"hospitalization for schizophrenia and delusional paranoia"
- based on or having faulty judgement; mistaken.
"their delusional belief in the project's merits never wavers"
Yes I can just as everyone can and has.Again pad , you can't say that the data about water memory is not scientific .
river said: ↑
Again pad , you can't say that the data about water memory is not scientific .
Yes I can just as everyone can and has.and have shown conclusively.......
Next, since water is composed of hydrogen and oxygen, is it hydrogen that keeps the so called memory or oxygen? And if, for the sake of the argument, it is the hydrogen element that is keeping this memory, so how about all other molecules containing hydrogen? Do they have memory too? E.g., Does H2S have memory too?
Tap water of death
One of the interesting questions surrounding the concept of water memory, is explaining how billions of people worldwide drinking out of natural and tap sources of water are not dropping dead of overdoses. One environmental watchdog group has documented over 500 chemicals in an average glass of tap water, many of which are used in homeopathic treatments.[16] The EPA of course sets maximum concentration for these chemicals in water, and over time the maximum concentration has decreased considerably. Many people consider this to be a way of making tap water safer to drink, but according to the logic of homeopathy that's actually making it worse! More dilution equals stronger effect.
What of oxygen ?
Highlighted
Only reputable links river. You see like you, I havn't the scientific equipement nor the education like you, nor the time like you, to investigate those reputable links river....but unlike you, also I don't go and pretend I know more then I do and commence to make unsubstantiated and unsupported claims, as you obviously do on all things mainstream.Have you looked into it ?
Umm, Oxygen is required for all oxidisation and combines with many other substances. So?
Only reputable links river. You see like you, I havn't the scientific equipement nor the education like you, nor the time like you, to investigate those reputable links river....but unlike you, also I don't go and pretend I know more then I do and commence to make unsubstantiated and unsupported claims, as you obviously do on all things mainstream.
If this thread had any science or evidence supporting it, it would have remained in the sciences instead of being shifted.
Or perhaps they needed your expertise on it[sorry river, only joking
]
https://skepticalinquirer.org/2011/05/the-memory-of-water/
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Water_memory
Water memory is one of the concepts central to modern (i.e., post-Avogadro) homeopathy.
You do it pad so people won't listen to me . )
It's total nonsense just as the links and references have said.There is nothing conclusively found that shows the water memory data is not scientific .
Water is water, is water, is water...hard or soft, distilled or purified, alkaline or mineral.[QUOTE ] it removed and stay permanently in water then?
No that will be molecules of active substsnces mixed in distilled water. Not plain tap water.Water is water, is water, is water...hard or soft, distilled or purified, alkaline or mineral.
Well it is good that you have abandoned the the 'water memory' fantasy. However, since this is a base assumption of homeopathy, that sort of kills that whole load of pseudoscience.Whole thing now got changed due to Adsorption theory. Molecular presence of active and other substances in lieu of information or memory presence of desired substances in water took water memory place.
Actually, I was talking about moecular or informatión presence iñ higher dilutions which was never endorssed by science community due to theoritical status of science as on date. However this got set back due to this new adsorption theory justification. Although I am not discussing about efficacy from small dose in topic because it is already well observed by homeooathic community since long back. Moreover a science theory justifuing biphasinc dose effect i.e. high dose inhibition and low dose stimulation of physiological activities in name of Hormesis already exist. Few drops vof water can awaken a person or bring a faint person in consiousness. A dot on your screen necessitates more concentration than the whole screen i.e. increased physiological activities. A hungry lion become more energetic than a lion with full stomach n feel lazy. So on...Well it is good that you have abandoned the the 'water memory' fantasy. However, since this is a base assumption of homeopathy, that sort of kills that whole load of pseudoscience.
Your new position is that the lower the concentration, the stronger the effect. That seems to be wrong, but on closer inspection it is completely absurd.
That would mean that taking 100 mg of caffeine would keep you awake and decreasing the amount to 1 mg would have no effect, however decreasing the amount to 10^-6 mg would help you sleep. Absurd...
Oh I drink tap water all the time. I'm not into this purified bottled water that we see all the beautiful people carrying around today. But then again, I'm an old fart!No that will be molecules of active substsnces mixed in distilled water. Not plain tap water.
Oh I drink tap water all the time. I'm not into this purified bottled water that we see all the beautiful people carrying around today. But then again, I'm an old fart!