Religion and women.

It’s more of a metaphor for something that comes with being human.

The question is simple enough to comprehend.
If I simplified it anymore, I probably be accused patronising.

Thank you.
Can I have a sticker

Read the question again, then base you POV on the actual question

For mankind

It seems that way.

Why do you?

If it is natural, and you have no idea of it, there’s no point in trying to explain it to you. Just as there is no point in trying to explain God to you

Everybody.

There are those of us who will understand the simplicity in what I say. And there are those of us that won’t, no matter simply it is put. You appear to be of the latter.

Are you asking me if I advocate tyranny in the family? No I don’t.

Husband, wife, children.

I gave a definition of emotion earlier. I think you should look for it, so you don’t make the mistake of falsely accusing me.

You’re mistaken.
Women are more emotional (look for my definition of emotional).
Men can be just as emotional, but it is not a good thing IMO. We can see the damage, and carnage, that happens when men lose control and get angry. It’s not pretty. Men should learn to control these emotions.

Because uncontrolled emotion is dangerous, especially in a man.

That’s silly James.

To you maybe.
Do accept the conclusions of the OP?

You are correct... aren’t you James?

If I tried to break down the already basic point I made, I would be classed as patronising.
What I write is what I mean (unless there is bad spelling or typos).

If you’re clear you can copy and paste this quote in a search engine, I’m there will be stuff to make it clear for you. I’m unable to make something as obvious as that any clearer.

Do I?
Well ain’t that a... shame!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

He’s a bit of a snowflake.
Identifies as Christian, but supports anti-Christian stuff.
I’m not convinced by him, or that ex gymnast turned glamour queen person, who wrote some that other stuff you laughingly call research

That’s not research, if anything it is propaganda.
It helps no one, and it creates division.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

But it’s ok to accuse religion and Christianity as the cause of men abusing women? Based on the smatterings of a few liberals? Do you have any idea how that could turn out if the wrong tyrant believes something like that. Have you forgotten the mass killings of the 20th century by communists who uphold the culling of of religion and the religious, due to their manifesto.?

Maybe that’s why don’t get it.
Can you tell when someone takes a comment personally, and proceeds to express them self from that point of view, even though the comment is not aimed at them personally?
That’s being emotional. I use that example because we are seeing it here in droves.

You say those responses of wegs that I put up as examples of emotion, which lead to her being irrational, were anecdotal. But that type of response is common in women, we just take it for granted. But if Alex can claim his hate of religion and Christianity as something that is researched, when it clearly isn’t, and you accept it. Then accept that women are emotional based on how women communicate, wegs being a perfect example. Don’t take it personally. If you don’t agree then state why. This is a discussion forum.

Men and women argue differently, example shown. As wegs is not quite for me, you will find that MST of what she says, regarding this topic will be based in emotion, until she decides to address what I’m actually saying.
As for bilvon, I don’t know what to tell you.
He will not bend from his view.
He will carry it on.

It doesn’t matter what culture, there will always be a difference between man and woman.
Men tend to be leaders (in most cultures), it’s just the way it is. I didn’t write the narrative, I only observe it. We don’t need emotional leaders.

 

But I did not claim my hate of religion and Christianity has been researched...it has not and hate is rather strong and not on the money...I dislike religion and Christianity because it cons folk starting with early brain washing, using fear of death to have folk subservient...I feel pity for Christians.

But don't worry I know what you mean..happily there is plenty of research and what I posted I admit was rather soft but now that you want research I will start bring it in...there is lots of it. And your statement about communism ignores the numbers christianity can claim...more than any other group...the difference was communists killed for essentially political reasons whereas the killings done by Christians has been of other religions or other christians, and cruel killings to boot..just examine the facts, burnings a preferred method.
Alex

Sorry to jump in but you were just to loose with your words I had to present the truth.

Alex

 

What was your answer?

Thank you, they’re the best kind.

Yes. Mankind

Because an emotional man, can be dangerous.
We have seen the results of emotional men all throughout the summer of last year, and the murder, and crime rate that has erupted throughout the USA.
You step on my 2000 dollar shoes, I kill you. If I can’t kill you, then I’ll kill your family. Brah!
Maybe if he stopped and thought for a moment, he may have come to the conclusion that taking someone’s life for something so petty is tad OTT.
Now it’s your turn.

It’s quite possible it could avoid situations like the one mentioned above

It is the best chance for raising balanced children.
You’re more unlikely to have scenarios like the one mentioned above

A quick example
Do you know the “does my bum look big in these jeans” scenario? If not, read my exchange with wegs.

It can be, and it is getting that way, but generally it’s not.

Like what?

I’m not worried, I accept that evil must have it’s day. It’s more of an observation.

That religion and Christianity are the cause of men’s abuse of women, or something as dumb as that.

I meant to say “bitch” instead of shame but I didn’t know if that rhetoric is allowed here.
Is it?
Or will I be charged, again, with the bogus crime of being sexist.
In my defence, I do not think that women are female dogs. I believe that women are purely human beings, your honour.

 

No.
None of that addresses the question.

An emotional man will be blinded by emotion

IOW let’s move on, because blatant evidence does not count in snowflake county.

I have no clue what you’re talking about.
Moving along...

It doesn’t matter

It’s not.
Which is my point.

Something like that.

Ok.

Feel free to give a demo.

Hmm!
You ask me a question, then conclude that it is interesting as if I answered yes.

“Does my bum look big in this dress”
“No dear”
“Why are you lying, you know I have a big bum”
“Ok your bum does look a bit big”
“So you’re saying I have a big bum, how could you”

Off her and her big bum go, to make up the sofa which will be his sleeping quarters for the next few days

 

I still don’t understand how words on a screen, especially without using an exclamation point, are seen as “emotional?” What kind of wizardry is this?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Understand Jan, sexist men dismiss women in debates as emotional and irrational, not all men. I think if you said “hey, I’m a sexist because...” it would lend some credibility to your views but you deny that you’re a sexist, yet your posts drip of sexism.

If you don’t see your posts as sexist, what do you consider examples of sexism? Sexism is a form of prejudice, so when you broad brush all women’s opinions as less valid than men’s, because women are more emotional, that is a form of prejudice.

 

Again, Alex, you can be certain that no one noticed that you were defending paddoboy against Bullying and Abuse in a Thread that only existed because of what a Moderator described as "A typically misogynistic comment from" paddoboy.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Is that clear, Alex?
......

You are truly remarkable

Not at all, you truly are remarkable, Alex.
Like I stated, the impecable, infallable ability that you possess to personally accuse someone and proceed to personally determine their guilt with out being in any way, shape or form judgemental does not go unnoticed, Alex.
Ergo...truly remarkable.

Like I said, Alex, you can rest assured that no one could even remotely infer that any impetus for starting this Thread had anything at all to do with you trying to absolve paddoboy of responsibility for his seemingly Sexist, disrespectful actions and behaviour towards women because "he was raised a catholic and clearly they radiate a total disrespect for women..."?
Or did someone else Post ?:

Again, Alex, you seem to be able to selectively ignore the following Points, I even attempted to highlight the first one so that you couldn't help but notice...if you were to actually read my Post, that is :
But the most important thing to remember Alex, is that NOT ONE PERSON in this Thread has disagreed with the notion that the Church and Religion is Sexist, nor has anyone tried to argue that the Church and Religion is NOT Sexist...

And now we come to the Biggie, Alex!
Do all you can, utilize all of the remarkable abilities that make you the Envy of so many, to refuse to see that only a Mysoginistic, Sexist, Disrepectful TINY LITTLE MAN(If you choose to call a sub-human creature like that a man?) would use the excuse that the Teachings of other Mysoginistic, Sexist, Disrepectful TINY LITTLE MEN(If you choose to call sub-human creatures like them men?) would or could or should absolve themselves of any personal responsibility for Mistreating, Abusing or Taking the Life of their Wife!

Sadly, yes, Alex, I did read it word-by-inane-puerile-word...
Did you read the response I Posted that I thought your little inane, puerile attack deserved?

So to wrap this up, Alex, stay smug and remember to just keep telling yourself that ...I(dmoe) am the one that is wrong and everything I(dmoe) Post is driven by nothing but my Hatred, Jealousy, Envy, Dislike, etc...for paddoboy and yourself, Alex...
Again...just keep telling yourself that, Alex...make it your Mantra...

I do not seek nor need your accolades, Alex...and there really is no need for you to Shout or Yell DMOE....simply referring to me as dmoe wil suffice .

Okay, so now please remember, Alex, all you need to do to maintain manliness(?) is to keep telling yourself...and, again, possibly even make it your Mantra, Alex :
...dmoe is the one that is wrong and everything dmoe Posts is driven by nothing but his Hatred, Jealousy, Envy, Dislike, etc...for paddoboy and Alex... ..dmoe is the one that is wrong and everything dmoe Posts is driven by nothing but his Hatred, Jealousy, Envy, Dislike, etc...for paddoboy and Alex....dmoe is the one that is wrong and everything dmoe Posts is driven by nothing but his Hatred, Jealousy, Envy, Dislike, etc...for paddoboy and Alex.....dmoe is the one that is wrong and everything dmoe Posts is driven by nothing but his Hatred, Jealousy, Envy, Dislike, etc...for paddoboy and Alex...Ad Infinitum...

 

Jan, give me the address for Jesus' vlog.

 

He will never do that. He knows his opinions are sexist, and that if he ever expresses them he will be shown as such. So he "talks around" them to maintain deniability. He will often, for example, write in a very convoluted fashion so he never comes out and says "women are irrational." Instead he will say things like "some groups are emotional and irrational" and "that group includes the group I am talking about" and "I am talking about women." Then, when he is called on it, he claims "I NEVER SAID THAT!" because he can retcon his words to mean something different via a mealy-mouthed argument.

 

Don't be scared.

It's the power of God.

 

I don’t believe for one second that you don’t understand what has been written. I’ll bet you can see how emotional and irrational you have been by falsely accusing me of being sexist while unable to bring a point where I undermine women, not to mention the parts where I say I don’t. This is a very poor standard.

Yet you refuse to give explanation of why you think I’m sexist, or the parts of the post you think highlighted your accusation.
As far as I can tell, I am sexist because you deem it so. Now you say I would be more credible if I just came out and said I was sexist. I guess Saddam Hussein would have more credibility if he had just came out and said he had WMD’s.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

You are proving me right, that women are emotional, and uncontrolled emotion such as what you are exhibiting in these last few posts, is irrational.

 

@DMOE...

... I noticed you liked wegs last post.
Can you explain what about my posts gives her the right to label me as a sexist?

 

Let’s assume you’re talking about Jesus Christ of Bethlehem

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Sorry I don’t have it.

 

Wow, you guys have devolved to “thought crimes”? Guilty because even though you said that, you actually meant this.
No wonder you’ve done away with discussion.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Not at all. You can think whatever you like; it's not a crime.

No one here has accused you of a crime. Are you making stuff up again?

 

You know it girl

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

And yet another false allegation
https://lordslibrary.parliament.uk/misogyny-a-new-hate-crime/