Religion and women.

Yes.
“Witch trials”
Not woman trials

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Are you going to deny that men were tried and killed for being witches?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I don't think so.

You see, today people is turning kind of silly, everything offend them as if it is an attack to their condition, orientation, status, belief, etc.

Long ago you can tell jokes about a blind man, today your joke can be taken as offensive. You can't laugh of jokes about cripples, homosexuals, religious dudes, etc. Someone, somewhere will claim such is offensive.

In my job, where I was discriminated a lot, a supervisor used to imitate my funny English speaking, and he was so good doing it that I never felt offended but I was laughing of his jokes same as the others were laughing of me.

Jokes are essential in life, and if women can't handle them, the problem is not with the one making mockeries but with those women who feel offended.

I wonder why people didn't feel offended when jokes by thousands were made on president Trump. Surely you laughed too. I did, and my guess is president Trump also laughed of the jokes on him.

In this life, if you don't OWN a strong personality, then you'll become the typical social resent finding "enemies" everywhere just because people have good times finding funny the act of laughing on someone.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

as i have gotten old
i find that i have grown intolerant of those who are intolerant
i feel offended by people who feel offended when no offense was intended
etc...
etc...
Just because someone is mentally ill, they should not expect me to join their insanity.

(sigh)

 

Are you even capable of answering a single fucking question? Again:

The population of the U.S. in the 1660s was approximately 75 thousand; global population was over 500 million. Surely you're aware that there were witch trials elsewhere, yes?

As to your baseless assumptions: they don't merit a response.

 

Idiot.

 

Only link number three in your list provides some statistics, but failed to show the total in the country. The other links do not reflect modern society but references of past cultures which are not important today at all.

Lets use a typical case of domestic violence. A man and a woman fell in love and got married. Now well, married is an institutionalized union where the couple live together as one, this is recognized even when income taxes are filled up. Man have rights of coupling with the wife, and if the man have sex outside his marriage, such is considered adultery.

Years pass by and suddenly the wife decided to be "independent" but she wants to continue being married but independent of her husband. She wants to get out of the house at her will, stop having sex with the husband plus find another lover from time to time.

The husband finds out her play, and he reacted with violence because she broke the contract. Remember when you sign a marriage paper, you are compromising yourself in a contract.

By law, the one who brakes the contract is the one to lose everything, but the wife using a corrupt attorney finds the way to keep the children, even after it is found she was cheating on the husband. Tell me, does the judge is correct allowing the custody of the children in hands of the bitch? Is that the right decision?

She is not the right example for the children, she broke the contract and she is supposed to lose all the rights on the children. Remember, marriage IS a contract.

The act of violence from part of the husband is not to be forgiven, but such is not cause to lose the custody of his children because his was a reaction of the fault committed by the wife.

As you can see, you just can't judge such act of violence as misogyny, and many cases as the one given here as an example, are not to be counted as such.

It is understood that is more common to find cases of violence against women, this is not rare with mammals in nature, and we are mammals. Of course we have reasoning and we are not to imitate the wild beasts, but if this is correct, then same applies with not imitating homosexuality from wild animals but we must keep reasoning first... then you are trapped... oh yes... you are trapped... no escape... no justification to attack blindly the behavior of man in front of several situations in life.

The law is made to protect our integrity, and this include our physical and mental status, so, for every case you show violence of man against a woman, you must review the causes first, because in many cases such violence was provoked.

Our points of view are different, because you don't see what I can see, which is beyond your comprehension by your lack of seeing the whole horizon. For me the law against rape is not fully enforced but discriminate inmates. For example, most people, including you, accept rape of men in jail but fully reject rape of a woman in the street. To me, rape is rape and both situations are unacceptable. You don't care about men raped in jail, for you "such is part of their punishment", even when the court never stated it. You watch movies where such rape happen or are predicted, and for you there is not a single reaction, however, you watch a movie where a woman is raped and you feel compassion for her and turn against such an act.

See the failing with the current tendency in society? You are dedicated to defend "women rights" by over passing men's rights, and such is also unacceptable.









-

 

Yes.
Why are you being so emotional?
Chill out bro

Assumption?
Really?

Wyporska: Whenever I give talks, the one myth I’m really keen to dispel is the archetype of the witch as female, healer, midwife or herbalist.

In fact, between 20-25 per cent of those we know to have been executed for the crime of witchcraft were men. In what is now Ukraine, Russia and Finland, up to 80 per cent of those accused were men. As Christina Larner said, witchcraft accusations were sex-related, not sex specific.
https://www.newstatesman.com/2018/1...itchcraft-were-men-and-other-surprising-facts

“More men than women were prosecuted for witchcraft in countries such as Normandy, Estonia, Burgundy, Russia and Iceland”
https://inews.co.uk/opinion/comment...-people-accused-of-witchcraft-were-men-354563

“In England the majority of those accused were women. In other countries, including some of the Scandinavian countries, men were in a slight majority. Even in England, the idea of a male witch was perfectly feasible. Across Europe, in the years of witch persecution around 6,000 men – 10 to 15 per cent of the total – were executed for witchcraft.”
https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/learn/histories/eight-witchcraft-myths/

Doesn’t merit a response huh?
Cheers emotional bro

 

This thread is getting increasingly hostile as more men come in to share why they don’t think misogyny is even a thing, let alone that they display misogynistic behavior. Ya know, women should learn how to take a joke, etc...lol

What year is this?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

It’s like when Harvey Weinstein denied the rape charges with “I thought she/they wanted it.”

Hey, if you want to be like that guy, have at it.

 

Yea, it’s just not worth it imo to respond to them, anymore. *shrug*

I have Jan on ignore but soon others will be added, at this rate.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

As I catch up with the posts in this thread, am I reading that Luchito is advocating for violence against women as long as a man can prove it was “provoked?”

Oh wow

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

So now God is a man....
Are you kidding ?

 

It doesn’t matter what I think.
Unless you have more information, those women and men that were killed in witch trials were considered, witches

 

I love your joke. I didn't realized women are funny too. Mine is so serious, but I think she never laughs of my jokes because she never understand them... I got married to her because others who know her told me she was a serious person, and they were right... she never even smiles when we make love.

 

God never identified himself as woman or as female, but man and male.

Even the son, Jesus called him "Father".

You see, perhaps other religions besides the biblical might have goddess, but the known main religions from ancient eras, the whole of them identify their primary deity as manly, male.

So be it.

You won't change that with whatever argument you want to invent. Such inheritance has been established forever, forever ever.

But, you can create your new religion, the XXI century religion where the goddess created a new era (because the universe has been created already by a manly male god, so your are late to create the universe again.)

Make your new religion and spread it throughout all around the world, so you can satisfy your inquiries.

 

I have done.
She is acting emotional, so I’m calling her out.

I’ve just told you.

Why is that sexist?

What is the accusation regarding these posts?

Show me what you mean

This is the point “belief came into the picture...
“The irony is that you have spent these past 66 pages trying to tell Wegs what she should believe.”
...the sad thing is that you don’t care that you lie.
You don’t care if it causes any damage to people.
In fact it seems as though harming people who do not agree with you, or don’t back down to you, is the objective. The scary thing is that it has become a mindset. Very sad

You really do have a problem Bells.
I’m beginning to think you are being serious with these false accusations

I can answer it, but not with you, or any Snowflake.

Stick to the topic, you’re too emotional to discuss anything like that, and it’s not because you’re a woman. I don’t discuss God, outside of the preliminaries, with James, bilvon, Sarkus, etc

It can’t be that important if you can’t be bothered to fetch it.

No it wasn’t Bells.
You just felt like backing a liar. Probably because the lies were aimed at me. God haters have a problem with me.

Just empty, false accusations Bells. Pitiful
You need some new material