UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

Discussion in 'UFOs, Ghosts and Monsters' started by Magical Realist, Oct 10, 2017.

  1. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    wegs:

    Sure!

    Science, for instance, is full of quite unexpected discoveries of things that were previously thought to be impossible or at least implausible.

    Who would have thought, for example, that entire continents could move around over time, completely altering the global geography of the world's land? The idea of "continental drift" was scoffed at by many when it was first proposed. But separate lines of evidence accumulated to the point where it no longer became tenable to deny that continent drift happens. Today, all competent Earth scientists accept the theory of plate tectonics and, indeed, regard it as among the fundamental effects that have shaped Earth's geology, climate and biodiversity.

    The idea of "x-ray vision" existed long before x rays were discovered and named as such. However, the notion that people would one day be able to see inside the human body without breaking the skin would have been laughed off by many educated people - right up to the accidental discovery of x-rays. What led scientists to accept the existence of x-rays was, as usual, the accumulating evidence for them. In principle, anybody can build a working x-ray machine, given suitable instructions and materials. So denying the reality of x-rays is no longer tenable.

    These days, most of us accept the reality of plate tectonics and x-rays without batting an eyelid. Both of them seem like "ordinary" things - just part of our shared, accepted reality. But at one time, both were considered "extraordinary". In a sense, they still are, but we have all the evidence we need to accept that, extraordinary as these things might seem in the abstract, they are very real.

    The idea of alien spaceships has been with us for centuries. It is the claim that, right now, alien spaceship are visiting Earth, that is extraordinary. The difference between alien spaceships and x-rays, though, is that it's easy to produce convincing evidence for x-rays (now). But nobody has managed to produce convincing evidence that any alien spaceships are actually real, yet.

    Having lots of evidence doesn't necessarily convince everybody of the reality of a thing, of course. There are still plenty of climate change deniers and Young Earth creationists, even though there are mountains of evidence for anthropogenic climate change and mountains of evidence against Young Earth creationism. But climate change deniers and creationists aren't basing their beliefs on evidence. What they have in common is a refusal to look objectively at the available evidence.

    Similarly, a lack or absence of reliable evidence doesn't necessarily convince everybody to withhold their belief that a thing is real (which is the prudent and logical thing to do). People believe lots of things without having good evidence, often for reasons that don't stand up to scrutiny, as we've seen time and again with Magical Realist's ardent UFO and other woo beliefs.
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2022
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. wegs Matter and Pixie Dust Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,253
    I understand where you're coming from, James - but do you find that skeptics sometimes conflate ''improbable'' or ''most likely never to happen'' with ''extraordinary?'' In other words, everything that sounds extraordinary most likely is improbable (to a skeptic)?

    Space aliens could fit into the improbability category, but if they did exist, it'd be ''extraordinary.'' We can agree on that point. But, if say the tic tac object is that of some type of advanced military weapon or aircraft, that doesn't seem so far-fetched, yet we could consider it to be extraordinary, as well. I don't think this is a matter of semantics, rather it could explain why skeptics and UFO enthusiasts struggle to meet halfway.
     
    Magical Realist likes this.
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,057
    I would say, What's the difference? Ordinary = probable, not ordinary = not probable.

    I'd say space aliens are highly probable. Them coming to earth is highly improbable.
     
    DaveC426913 likes this.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,608
    The news said some guy and his son caught a very rare blue lobster. An improbable one in millions event. But still quite extraordinary! We shouldn't use probabilities to predict what will happen to us. We might miss out on the extraordinary when it brushes by us.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2022
    wegs likes this.
  8. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,857
    How would using probabilities have prevented this fisherman from catching this crab?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    We know the probability is low that you will win the lottery this year (you have to play of course) but someone will win this year. It's good to know just how bad your chances are, don't you think? You can still play if it has entertainment value for you (or not).

    A blue crab is unusual. A red head is less common than a brunette. A super nova is even more rare but they do happen. Aliens on Earth isn't just "rare", it hasn't happened yet.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,608
    How could you possibly know something like that?
     
  10. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    Because, until something has been confirmed, it hasn't officially happened.
     
  11. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,608
    Except maybe for the millions even trillions of events that have occurred on our planet over the ages without being confirmed by anyone.
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2022
  12. Michael 345 New year. PRESENT is 72 years oldl Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,077
    Then without being confirmed they (whatever events they might have been) never happened

    No evidence, didn't happen

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  13. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,608
    Wrong. Absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence.
     
  14. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,935
    We seem to be wandering off the plot a little.

    Aliens haven't visited Earth as far as we know. The reason we're fairly confident of this is because there is no hard evidence of them existing - let alone visiting - now or in the past.


    Some interpretations of data/phenomena will invoke 'aliens' as a possible explanation - but that is not in-itself evidence of aliens.

    By comparison, any of that same data/phenomena can just as easily interpreted by invoking "God did it" as an equally possible explanation - but likewise, that is not in-itself "evidence of God".
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2022
  15. wegs Matter and Pixie Dust Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,253
    Life on this planet should tell us that life elsewhere in the universe could be quite possible. Maybe even intelligent life. Space is so old though, and maybe aliens have arrived here and left, long before human life. If anything is possible, that could be possible.

    One would think though that there'd be some type of tangible evidence ''left behind'' if that were the case and there seems to be zilch.
     
  16. sideshowbob Sorry, wrong number. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,057
    Millions and trillions of leprechauns. Millions and trillions of unicorns.

    (I forget - do you believe in leprechauns and unicorns?)
     
  17. wegs Matter and Pixie Dust Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,253
    I thought we were making this thread an ad-hom free zone.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Magical Realist likes this.
  18. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,608
    Neither...I was referring to natural occurrences like geology and meteorology and climatology and animal events like evolution and migration and extinction..
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2022
  19. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,608
    There are many things that have occurred thruout history for which there is no hard evidence. The importance of eyewitnesses rises in proportion to the "tracelessness" of the historical event. UFO's may just be that sort of phenomenon.
     
    Last edited: Aug 18, 2022
  20. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,857
    There's evidence for those things. That's the only reason that they exist as subjects.
     
  21. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,857
    UFO's = traceless event? OK, I agree.
     
  22. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,608
    The map is not the territory. These physical events happened whether we had evidence for them or not. Reality is strange that way ya know?
     
  23. Seattle Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,857
    That's true. As they say, science is science whether you believe in it or not. Leprechauns aren't real even if you do believe in them, ya know?

    Physical events happened whether we had evidence for them or not but we don't know about them if there was no evidence.
     

Share This Page