Why are women inferior?

what a bizare language you speak... sgal.... such words....

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

what do you mean? do you agree or disagree?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Uh... They aren't?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Listen all I am saying is that both male and female have the same power. Noone is inferior or superior... Women have psychological control and men physical.

 

I thought you said they had the same power.

 

this shit is crackin me up dudes.
everyone's confused, and yet, we don't really speak the truth.

i'm of the opinion that men are superior, but women have so many tactics they try to emply to show that they are superior, or extremely equal, etc. so much so that there is a war between who is and isn't inferior, discussed in Xevs opening post. ...

There are so many issues, we could discuss until the end of time.
Sgal, i disagree: your language is too strict and away from the actual point....
lol,

existabrent

 

I created them that way.

 

And since, God has hated you.

 

In the context here it means...'I the poster am ignorant of the subject matter'

so when posters state here that women are 'inferior' or men are 'superior' this is what it means.

 

I suppose being superior means not being inferior.

And being inferior as a person would mean that this person relies on another person for general sustenance.

Maybe that works? Perhaps we could revise it.

 

Yes. It is sad that God should hate his creator.

I think everyone's using the definition that best suits their arguments.

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Isn't that how most arguments work? Though it is cumbersome to define every term before the debate. For one, it is hard. Two, everyone would argue the definitions and the would not argue the real issue. Man, it sucks.

 

I agree James.... pointless babble bull
btw eariler in the thread i started my typical
[see thread feministic views and domestic violence....]
rant, which, is similar to, yet inferior to, the one perhaps at the thread stated above...

what i'm getting at is that simply ...people don't care about this shit. no fine:
anyway, there's my input.

 

btw, yes, we have attempted to get to that although atm the thread seems cess(chess?)...pool, material! yea!

 

That depends on whether or not it supports your position to include: "everyone uses the definitions that best supports their position" in your definition of "argument."

 

What? I don't understand. I was just making a joke.

 

sorry, wanted to comment at how pissed i was at a sexist freak, who believes she knows what men do not know.

it pisses me off. what did you expect in this post, freaking, that someone likely didn't reply to: i tel you now, TOR, princess peach herself.... LOL: that, BTW: this was in response to a awesome post from Jaybee, who, said some things you couldn't possibly argue aganist, (which, you can't castrate logic btw sweetie! so go finger your goddamned self! I appoligise but you are pissing me off: the thought that someone would think such things is beyond human.)

You are THE most illogical person I have ever read. It is amazing halarious and annoying as hell that you possibly write things which, sorrie logic chomper, but, that are stupid. "I'm not anti man" : Oh no your not dear! You're anti establishment. It is halarious that you would try to beat ME at MY own game: "I don't want a female world"; like your the only person who has thought about that? Like, you have no idea that there are other people who can criticize your writings. You damn sure deserve it TOR.

You tell me how what you said has anything to do with anything. Or were you just looking to get criticed? That is all your post is good for damit!

Women CAN reproduce without men (its been shown if our eggs are heated to a certain temp. they don't need sperm!)
followin you dear woman.

you are right... damn... how about that.. wow.. brillant thinking...

...where's your LOT (line of thought, tor) going? Oh, i... if only... if only women weren't so PMS! damn! almost had you you castring woman lol

sorry, not over that yet. i don't think any of us are. Are you?
you do not contribute in any largest of any way possible.
go back to the destructing of man you are so apt about:
... let's see... what areyou thinking now? well, ... how about you are not able to contribute logical? how about... you're not contributing anything. you're blabbing that's all you do (as i've said before!), GEE!........... appoligise, btw tor, but... you don't contribute in the largest of ways AT ALL.
Think about it. get realistic... as you say: If it were not for men, as you say, you'd have a world of women, which is unintelligent: men created woman. lol. men created the earth. without technology, you'd destroy yourselfs. you have to think of another way to critizise men, tor, this thread is a thread for the INFERIORITY OF WOMEN!

LONG LIVE THE CALL!

LOL

 

Not because ~300 million years ago Nature decided that unisex was a net liability.

Because the female human egg is among the most formidably defended natural structures on the planet, and the most over-engineered structure of all time.

Most guys aren't lesbians.

 

What part of 'superior' isn't sinking into that pc skull of yours, jamie-boy?? Bit of a dirty word in your circles, 'superior', eh? Why don't you read ANY of those 35 pages and actually learn about something more real-life than "The surpression of transvestite rights in Peru between 1760 and 1765"??

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Mentally and physically, men are superior. These advantages then subdivide into hundreds of others across society, with new ones being formed and existing ones intensified as societies develop.


Jaybee.