Israel says it will bomb any vehicle that moves in south lebanon, Prams? Remote toys?

Discussion in 'World Events' started by vincent, Aug 8, 2006.

  1. vincent Sir Vincent, knighted by HM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,883
    Israel says it will bomb any vehicle that moves in south lebanon.

    Does that include prams, thats a vehicle with wheels, how about a kid on a bike? a kid playing with a remote controlled car, ambulances.

    They do seem to have a very broad agenda, where do they draw the lines here.

    How about dropping leaflets like, anybody leaving there house to go shopping or to work or to eat, is a legitamate target of israel bombs?


    There does seem to be a whole lot of love in the middle east these days.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. marv Just a dumb hillbilly... Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    743
    Hmm, why not! It's a good day for getting rid of terrorists and wannabes....

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Brian Foley REFUSE - RESIST Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,624
    What sticks in my throat Vincent are those 31 Syrian orchard workers who were blown to kingdom come . I dont know people just going to work and then the bombing of that apartment buliding yesterday killing scorse of civilians in Beirut , this is really a campaign of mass murder nothing else Hezbollah has been virtually untouched .
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. otheadp Banned Banned

    Messages:
    5,853
    the assumption is that anybody still south of the Litani River cannot be a civilian. that's because all able civilians are gone to escape the war zone - which is what that area is. nobody is going shopping there... nobody's even got their store open there. the place is abandoned.
    there is also no gas there.. so even if there are civilians who weren't able to get out with the rest, they wouldn't have gas. and any gas that would remain would be confiscated "for the cause" by Hizb to be used to transport whatever

    the main goal here is to prevent re-arming via trucks.
    therefore a kid on a bike would logically not be targeted. it's silly even to suggest this.

    remember the goal and morals of the IDF... theres no point at shooting at civilians because the world would then make Israel stop its offensive. there are other reasons - shooting at "useless" targets is expensive. gotta save those bombs for the sheep-fucker with the lice in the beard
     
  8. thedevilsreject Registered Senior Abuser Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,812
    whats changed, they have been bombing any vehicle already, north or south of the litani river
     
  9. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    They have no more leaflets.
     
  10. candy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,074
    The "morals" of a group that has a history of strafing lifeboats are questionable.
     
  11. vincent Sir Vincent, knighted by HM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,883


    What about a person in a motorised wheelchair, dont need gas does it, is that a legitamate target?


    "re-arming via trucks"

    From what has been reported all the rockets are in caves, and in bananna plantations, which could obscure a million rockets judging by the pictures of these plantations today.


    It seems to me Israel is the only country in the world, beyond international law, they get to kill BBC reporters on purpose, they get to kill UN personel, even though they beg them to stop bombing them for hours.

    Im beginning to wonder if israel nuked iran, & syria or the UK tommorow, would the UN dare even to start santions against israel.

    No country should be given absolute freedom to kill UN staff on purpose in my view, & Kofi (nescafe) Annans 1st words on it too, the fact that israel has a get out of jail card that is gold plated, is what is pissing all the arabs off.

    Nobody should be above the law, but israel is, there the untouchables.
     
  12. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    It seems Hezbollah is above the law, they can kill Jews at will and no one is allowed to stop them.
     
  13. Genji Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,285
    They need to kill more. The death toll should be evenly reflected on the side of the zionists.
     
  14. Genji Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,285
    Israel seems to think they are above the law. They send soldiers into Lebanon looking for Elected Hezbollah members, two are caught and Israel destroys an entire country, without any discussion with anyone. Why would they expect to be treated like a real country on the stage of world nations? You reap what you sow.
     
  15. vincent Sir Vincent, knighted by HM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,883

    Time & time again i here israel blaming iran & syria for hamas & hezbollah.
    Only today there president said iran & syria are behind it all.

    Then why the hell are they bombing all of lebanon, & killing palestine people, what can this ever achieve other than crate another million terroists worldwide.

    The only way to stop hamas & hezbollah is to bomb the iranian leaders & the syrian ones, its so fucking simple a child could see the soloution here.

    If someone pays a terroist to blow people up, you attack the paymasters, u dont attack millions of innocent poeple, without the paymasters there is no terroism.
     
  16. Fraggle Rocker Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,690
    I suppose at some point that might become a reasonable assumption, if only because once the civilians and terrorists in the area are thoroughly obliterated, the only people who will come back into the region will be replacement terrorists. But I don't think they have killed off all of the original inhabitants of the region yet.

    No, I think the assumption is that if you kill a large enough percentage of a region's civilians, the remainder will stop supporting the only organized group in the region that is fighting against you.

    Sounds like a textbook case of insanity to me.
     
  17. Genji Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,285
    I agree with your last sentence, that without paymasters there is no terrorism. Ending US support of Israel would be a huge step in the right direction. The regime in Iran will crumble from within eventually. Remember they are a 3rd World country at least a decade away from acquiring defensive nuclear capabilities to resist US/Israeli attacks. No need to be so terrified of their cheap rockets. Destabilizing Iran with an Iraq at war, then destabilizing Syria with Lebanon in civil war and under Jewish occupation is not a recipe for peace. The US can't even secure a single town in Iraq ater four years, there is no reason to believe igniting the entire region on fire, for Israel, will benefit anyone but radical islamists and jewish supremacists. Knock out Assad in Syria and I guarantee he'll be replaced with a turban wearing jihadist.
     
  18. vincent Sir Vincent, knighted by HM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,883

    Well said, its almost as the jews have just teleported into the area, after all this time they still have no grasp on how muslims think, all israel ever does is unifiy the arabs & create more terroists worldwide, its a grave pity the brits did not teach the idiots how to play chess, all these idiots ever do is knock down all the pieces on the chess board.....
     
  19. The Devil Inside Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,213
    perhaps the idea is to keep the conflicts burning to justify a large sweeping military action further down the road.

    its a shame, but a definite possibility.
     
  20. vincent Sir Vincent, knighted by HM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,883

    Well your right about syria, he probably is the lesser of the 2 evils, but i believ the iranians deserve a more more modern leader, who's views dont relate to the stoneage.

    There is alot of good iranians, and there is no way on earth they deserve another 25 years of the parasites running there country now, they are religous zealots of the worst kind, you can only compare them to the idiotic & evil witch finders of old europe.
     
  21. Genji Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,285
    I agree about Iran. I respect anti-US/Israeli goverments but not fundamentalist regimes. Iran DOES have millions of bright capable people, though a brain-drain has caused many to leave the country. Foreign inspired/financed intervention in Iran will not work. See Iraq, Cuba, Vietnam, Somalia, Haiti, Colombia, etc. The people of Iran must bring about the change, if they want it, by themselves. US/Israeli aggression and meddling will instantly curse any 'freedom movement' inside the country.
     
  22. vincent Sir Vincent, knighted by HM Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,883

    Im sure that wont happen, america is bankrupt & cant afford another war, bush will be out in 2 years or so, i dont think he has time to fit another war in, i have never seen a american president in my lifetime, who can not & will not talk to any nutter country out there, he just isolates them & pisses them off, clicks his ruby slippers together & wishes the problem will go away.

    A diplomat he is not, its my way or the highway thats all he ever says, he has been watching to many john wayne movies.
     
  23. The Devil Inside Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,213
    you give his handlers too little credit though.

    america has been bankrupt for a veeeeeerrrrry long time, it isnt a recent occurrance. more war is to follow as a direct result of american actions, vincent. mark my words.
     

Share This Page