copyright image theft (re. spuriousmonkey)

If the three agree, but not with one apart.

--- Ron.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

yeah, with a red hot poker.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

lol

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You are the hypocrite to consider yourself entilted to judge, but with such a piss poor example of conduct to show for yourself.

There is a general permission to quote posts, which according to my understanding is the reason for the notice at the bottom of the page:

Portions Copyright © 1996-2005 David Watanabe

So if you don't want to squander the bandwidth, don't post images to start off with, or use one of the free image hosting sites.

--- Ron.

 

you still here?

 

The image is not on david's site dumbass. It's on mine. You are not allowed to quote pictures from external sites unless permission is given. You have none.

You are not allowed to even quote text from external site. Unless permission is given.

You are a thief.

And your avatar is actually on dave's site. You just argued against your own case.

My pictures are not.

 

btw..i love your site spurious...

 

careful ron that monkey will go apeshit on you.

 

I quoted a sciforum posting.

If you add images to your postings, that is what happens.

James R already ruled on that.

An avatar is not a posting, two different issues.

Vexation is vexation.

I suggest to report to see what James R has to say abouit it.

--- Ron.

 

It's your own responsibility. If you swing a knife and you accidently kill someone with it you are still guilty. Or swing your fists and accidently hit your wife a few times.

 

I responded.

You did not.

Your image file continues to appear, but with no good reason to keep it there.

--- Ron.

 

i don't see the apology.

 

Never mind your tit for tat red herring, you have yet to write the apology, nor yet did you acknowledge your fault.

-- Ron.

 

I did. First page. I already pointed it out.

 

It's my site. I can put on it whatever I want. Freedom of speech.

 

The offence was your post after that, to the second page.

It is not funny.
I accuse you of a criminal intent.

You wrote:
"I do have evidence that Perplexity used my avatar without my explicit permission."

which was not true, was it?

I did no such thing.

You had no such evidence.

The image you presented was a counterfeit.


-- Ron.

 

Wow, you can really feel the sexual tension in this thread.

 

Call the police Ron. I'm sure they don't have a sense of humour either. Otherwise nobody is interested in your drivel.

which image btw?

 

Wait. This battle is not worth fighting, not for me.
I was wrong to get involved, even if there was good reason to.
I am sorry for posting here.

 

Why do you think this is about you? They have been squabbling for days.