That is such sensationalist horsehit!!! How could you actually post that crap and not hold your head down in shame??!! ...nothing but sensationalist crap designed to do nothing but focus attention on ONLY a few radical individuals of the Mormon religion! You should be ashamed of yourself, Roman, absolutely ashamed! Baron Max
Yes, Roman, you should be ashamed of saying that most Mormons are actually rather nice, family oriented people. Do you actually read before criticising, Baron?
Where did he say that???? Read that statement again, sir, and you'll see that he said: "Oh god. Mormons are horrible." How else can you read that?? Take you own advice, sir! Baron Max
I've heard of adolescents with "selective hearing," but selective sight? How do you not cause accidents everywhere you go?
Here, Baron. Since you seem unable to get past the first paragraph with out choking on your rage, here is where Roman says most Mormons are nice, family oriented chaps.
He said "a lot" ....that ain't even close to saying "most"!!! Get your head out of your asshole and read and think!! Baron Max
Road signs... instructions... news articles... You need to read in order to function in society nowadays. More likely, he's just an uptight alarmist bastard who enjoys being offended.
This is what Roman said, boys and girls ....please read the words and don't read INTO it what you want it say!!!! Anyone who can read that as anything but a denigration of the Mormons is either blind or can't understand English writing. Baron Max
Four exclamation marks? The sign of an unbalanced mind. As to reading what you want it to say, don't you feel the least hypocritical? Ever heard of the FLDS, Baron? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter_Day_Saints
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Learn something everyday and sometimes you wish you hadn't
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! wow Sam, you didnt know about that either-LOL I am batting 1000 tonight, time for bed- yessss.
I knew they were polygamous, but not that polygamous! You say that like its a good thing. :bugeye: Sweet dreams Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
It's great to hear another view so similarly shared with my own. How can you establish a sound religion, superficially trying to express monogamy, when the founder of the cult had over thirty wives and caused the destruction of an entire community in which he came from? Now you have Warren Jeffs, of the "Fundamentalist" Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, who had "40" wives, then went on the run for two years until they finally caught up with him: charged with having sex with a minor and prearranging underaged marriages. You cannot establish a religion when the founders that you look up to - Joseph Smith and Brigham Young - were both extreme polygamists and caused gross havoc within their communities and were responsible for deaths at gunpoint. Mormons seem to be affected by this because when it gets right down to fundamental values and views, they just don't think straight. there's always a warped twist in the way they think when it comes to logically reasoning deepr-rooted values and points of view. Muslim: I think you're being subjected to some unwarranted criticism. I also totally agree with your initial post. Fortunately, we very seldom - if ever - hear the term "savage" being used anymore to describe any past or present behavior of a group of people. This was and is a misnomer. In my view, as was somewhat suggested above, there are more savages in present-day culture than there were in the early evolutionary periods of homo sapiens. I would not call someone who is just trying to survive and cope with his environment with what he has available a savage. What does this term mean? Of course back the, society was not banded together into as much of an organized civilization like we have today, but population was a lot less too. You did what you had to to survive.