For Gustav - Metaphysics of Consciousness and Universe

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

myles
please

you distort and rearrange
you appear to be having trouble with quotes. browser?
explain

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

evaluate your contribution to thread. contrast. justify
if found lacking i shall ask you to leave

 

man most of the time I really enjoy the funky way you phrase shit. you're a freak, in which I feel some brotherhood.

 

ja
i find gustav amusing too

 

'by my silence'? (Were people making racists jokes or something? Point them out I will confront them!)

I hate to tell you this Myles, but we are not all standing around in a room listening to a formal debate we have assigned roles in.

I checked in on a thread after not participating for a while and found what seemed like one of your usual offensive condescending statements - quoted in a post of Wes' - this time starting with the obnoxious opening 'these people'... Instead of assuming that I understood this statement, which it turns out I did, I sought clarification, which took a rather a long time to get, I might add. In fact you don't quite come out and say it still. I can only hope that this is an indication that unconsciously you are somewhat embarrassed yourself. You can call this last thought a leap of faith on my part and not one I am very invested in.

As far as

Should I actually answer this question, Myles? Is there a logical reason to put an answer in front of someone who is habitually condescending?

Ah, well. I am leaving sciforums anyway and so will not have to read your condescension.

That idea sounds incredibly strange to me.

I absolutely understand your being critical of it. (critical: as in presenting counter-arguements, asking questions, etc. Not as in: condescension, dismissing individuals or whole groups at once, assuming to explore certain things is an affront somehow, etc.)

On the other hand every cosmological explanation I have heard sounds incredibly strange to me. Including every single one I have read described by physicists. I feel it is presumptuous, at least for me, to assume I can rate those strangenesses on some scale of likelihood. What the heck, I say, explore it.

I try to reserve my condescension for those who I think actually are trying to hurt people with their ideas.

'by my silence' indeed.

(there are also assumptions you make repeatedly about how people's posts relate to their beliefs and what people are doing when they post a certain idea at a certain time - but as you regularly say: life is too short. I hope you will catch on to these assumptions yourself.)

 

the problem
gustav with the way you write although amusing and quirky
seems to me so easily misread or not
on account of your style. if some do, dullards or otherwise,
the fault may be your own. if not, why not

 

wow and i thought sniffy and gustav were two different people.

 

Well, that's one way of doing it. You. of course, will be the judge of whether I am lacking.

If you read some of my earlier posts I believe you will find that I pointed that it was nonsensical to argue that something that does not exist can chose to exist. Equally silly is the notion that it chose to exist so that we could come into existence. I then pointed out the circularity of claiming that the universe exists so that we may exist, but that the universe only exists because we can observe it. I seem to remember mentioning that " god, the scientist and his heaven" appeared on the scene without a shred of evidence to support such a claim.

So, evaluate, contrast, falsify what I have said but stop talking at me like an angry teacher.

 

no she is taller and has bigger tits

 

[QUOTE=Gustav;1658038]ja
i find gustav amusing too


Das kann ich kaum glauben

 

[QUOTE=Grantywanty;1658107]'


Should I actually answer this question, Myles? Is there a logical reason to put an answer in front of someone who is habitually condescending?
Ah, well. I am leaving sciforums anyway and so will not have to read your condescension.

I think you should answer the question if only to show me the error of my ways. You must surely have an opinion on whether something which does not exist can choose to come into existence. I think it's nonsense. What do you think ?


I feel it is presumptuous, at least for me, to assume I can rate those strangenesses on some scale of likelihood. What the heck, I say, explore it. [

You must surely have some opinions in the matter and it is in no way presumptuous to venture an opinion. That is all anyone is doing on here. I am not aware of any certainties concerning the universe, our place in it, the meaning of existence and so on. All I would ask is that opinions are supported by some form of reasoning; otherwiswe anything goes. If you don't join the debate, you can hardly be said to be exploring.

 

myles

#2
#3
#6

i could always turn on an extra brain cell and ponder about your existence.
you might then find suicide to be an entirely viable option.

ja
choices
to exist or not

same goes for that sniffy character

 

This post has drifted away from logic. There are three sides presented by intelligent people here:

1. Those who understand the arguements, and accept them

2. Those who simply don't, because of personal logic

and

3. By those who are purely ignorant.

Sorry Gus, i need to implore the mod to lock this thread now.

 

logic?
if it were present here, some would have more
patience

n'est pa?

still maintain
universe existed
before gustav and reiku blinked hard to see it
will be also long after they've gone
doubtless me also

locked thread
knotted more likely

 

Knotted perhaps... But you are about as blind to science, as a bat is to daylight.

 

I've also realized, the last day or two, that you were the one who stole Ben's identity, and mocked me in your nasty attitude, making me and ben have a few crossed wires... the irony of this, is that you speak of ''knots,''? You cause them as much as you like to speculate them.

You are a very sad individual.