PETA kills 97% of its adopted animals

Discussion in 'Ethics, Morality, & Justice' started by Syzygys, Jan 13, 2008.

  1. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    look up
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    The SPCAs more or less went AR quite some time ago. Google the name Roger Caras.

    http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0880119.html

    The links to the RSPCA do uncover animal rights type activities like seeking bans on hunting. For some reason they're after duck hunting. That's animal rights.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    Sorry mad i didnt make this clear

    RSPCA
    Royal Sociaty for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    http://www.rspca.org.au/

    sorry this is so long its posted straight off there website
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Definitely animal rights.
     
  8. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,397
    The RSPCA (Australian branch, at least) is an animal welfare organisation, as is clear from its charter.
     
  9. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    I will ask for the second time. WHATS WRONG WITH THAT????

    or is it just that you want to be able to slaughter animals with a clear contious, how about waling would you like a go at that? what about having a shoot at the bilby (a highly endangered species)

    Your critisiums on the PETA sound less and less crediable the more you critisie the statuary body in charge of making sure that animals are treated humanly
     
  10. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Pure animal rights tripe. There is almost everything wrong with it.
     
  11. maxzuk Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    132
    This is a link to the PETA Forum.
    The PETA ADMIN doesn't seem to disagree with the charges.
     
  12. madanthonywayne Morning in America Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,461
    Well, while I support treating animals humanely. I do not recognize animals as having any rights whatsoever.

    PETA, on the other hand, wants "total animal liberation". Which means:
    What would the world look like in the unlikely case that PETA achieved its goals?
    No milk, no pets, even using silkworms is banned? WTF?

    Another interesting fact, PETA spends only 1% of its funds actually helping animals:
    Of course, a group that wants the ownership of pets banned can't be expected to help find homes for pets. Instead, they kill them. Clearly, they have no concern for cats and dogs. What do they think will happen to them if the ownership of pets is banned? Clearly, the answer is they will be killed, as are 97% of the pets PETA gets its hands on.

    As if all that were not bad enough, their activities and support for terrorist organizations makes them contemptable.
    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/282260/peta_when_animal_rights_becomes_terrorism.html

    "7 Things You Didn't Know About PETA." The Center for Consumer Freedom. URL: (http://www.consumerfreedom.com/article_detail.cfm/article/134)

    John Hawkins, "Quotes from the Animal Rights Movement." Rightwingnews.com. URL: (http://www.rightwingnews.com/quotes/animal.php)

    James Jarboe, "Testimony of James F. Jarboe, Domestic Terrorism Section Chief, Counterterrorism Division, FBI, Before the House Resources Committee, Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health, February 12, 2002,"The Threat of Eco-Terrorism." FBI. URL: (http://www.fbi.gov/congress/congress02/jarboe021202.htm)
     
  13. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    You can stick a sign on a steaming pile of manure that says anything that you want it to say, but it will still be a steaming pile.

    The list of items from the RSPCA might as well have been written by PETA. If you read the wording carefully and don't listen to people who try to weasel their way around it, it says no hunting, no farming, no pets, and the animal rights organizations decide and second-guess your decisions, with a heavy hand.

    I have every right to criticize the "statutory body."
     
  14. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Thank you, Mad Anthony. Terrorists and supporters of terrorism deserve nothing and should be given less than that.
     
  15. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    Mad i agree with you that is just unstatanable and to a large exstent wrong, we are not ment to be vegatarian for starter

    MetaKron

    actually it doesnt. It say humane farming (ie no batery hens and no live exports) sustainable fishing (exactly what the DSE wants as well), culling only lawfully santioned (by the DSE), the humane treatment of pets (pets are good and the shelter around the courner deals with all kinds including fish)

    Seems to me the only one you got right is hunting, would you be surprised to learn there is very little hunting in Australia at all and we are no worse off for it?

    They are the body in charge of enforcing the laws relating to animal protection and they do a very good job at it even though it shouldnt have to be there responcability at all
     
  16. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    You're not fooling me, Asguard. You might be fooling yourself. Read what it actually says.

    Item 11 asks the state to end all exploitation of animals. That means no human use period. Item 2 literally excludes all use of animals for food and fibre, with the possible exception of milk, but if you really want to get picky, use for milk would be excluded too, as would the use of wool. Item 9 rules out pets.

    I have no respect for an organization that claims not to be animal rights when it uses animal rights precepts and is weaselly, like animal rights groups, about how it applies its precepts. You're trying to tell me that they didn't say what they said, and you approve of an anti-hunting agenda, which amazingly has actually pretty much passed in England and the Australia, and that alone is adequate reason for the destruction of the animal rights and animal welfare organizations.
     
  17. Asguard Kiss my dark side Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    23,049
    item 11 refers to the fact that the STATES enact laws in regard to the prevention of cruelty rather than the federal government and that the RSPCA will then administer those laws. (thats there JOB)

    Item 2 requires that farming, transportation and slaughter be down humainly, under LAW as is there job

    Item 9 refers to the treatment of NATIVE animals under LAW

    Item 6 refers to the treatment of animals breading for PETS

    item 7 refers to minium conditions required for animals kept for farming AND as pets

    item 8 refers specifically to pet conditions

    If you disagree try reading the INTRODUCTION

    I have highlighted the most relivent point for you. You DO understand what husbandry is dont you? why would they advocate for minimum standeds if there goal was to abolish all animal use. You should get over your own bias
     
  18. Challenger78 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,536
    People should prioritize. Human beings, (their own kin) are being treated like animals everyday. Take care of your own before taking care of others...
     
  19. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    My own bias? They are the ones who wrote that they planned to stop all exploitation of animals. Advocating "minimum standards" is just a tool that they use to abuse people into giving up farming, hunting, and keeping pets.
     
  20. wsionynw Master Queef Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,309
    MK, what's the difference between a terrorist and a freedom fighter?

    Why do you hate animals so much?
     
  21. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502
    Who says I hate animals? I happen to want them to live. With the help of the RSPCA and other animal rights organizations, they will cease to live.
     
  22. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Why do you want them to live ?
     
  23. MetaKron Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,502


    No reason. That's a really stupid question.
     
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2008

Share This Page