The Jesus bed connection.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying there's a god like Zeus. What I'm saying is, the cause and effect of words is attributed to the god of Abraham, Moses, and Jesus, in the old writings.

What I have found, is that if you were to do historical research on the bed, and how we came to be using it, the accountings recorded in the New Testament then begin to make some sense, and can be found to be very helpful/useful in your quest for understanding. I'm talking history not religion.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

When History is Missing

When History is Missing

To Progress Humanity

Or

A Position in Politics

There's a big piece of history missing in your memory if Jesus is famous for the bed, yet you're not aware of this information. Lacking this information in your decision process, keeps you in the dark, and your educated/uneducated guesses reflect this. How important is it to be aware of Henry Ford and his efforts, his reasoning behind making cars available to anyone, and everyone, equally? A theme in history, a course/directions recommended, you remain unaware of due to your lack of education. The reasoning behind Jesus's efforts toward getting everyone in the bed, should be causing you to make different decisions, choose representatives that think differently. The people around you during your daily activities would be behaving differently toward one another. There would be less of a caste system mentality pervading our society. People would be more prone to include the well-being of others as factors in their decision process. Because of what they had learned/experienced in their history, people would live and work more in harmony with each other.

Because we have become/are satisfied with a society which maintains and facilitates the progress of inequality/"the haves and have-nots", in order that we may become so, history has had to be hidden, especially the parts teaching sharing between all people. Subsequently, instead of some becoming "haves", and others becoming "have-nots", we've lost our link with humanity, history. With our media concerned only with making superstar politicians, the lessons offered by history just don't get the ratings, just won't sell today's products. Because the attention of today's generation has become solely focused on themselves, the really wise, who have been recorded in history, are not able to have their effect, as intended.

It's like going 2000 years in the future, and you look around and see temples everywhere in the name of Henry Ford, but no one that you speak with seems to know anything about the car. Too many people have traded their/our history for positions in political corporations. Rather than studying and learning, this generation has decided to play/depend on politics instead. In order to do this, those who have lived in the past must be robbed of their rightful position and influence, and so must those of the future. In order to see what we really look like, our mirror must reflect the past and future as well as the present.

Would free speech lead people to the truth? Would it have caused the people to choose Jesus rather than Barabbas?

John 18:40 Then cried they all again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber.


Alan
Search + Share ~ Magnetrition
http://www.freewebs.com/alanejackson/index.htm

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

A rose by any other name, is still a rose.
A word, no matter what the language, the meaning remains the same.

Each word in our/man's vocabulary had to have had a date when it was first used, right?

Our/Man's vocabulary started out with one word, when another was added, and words are still being added today, right?

That's the way each of us got our personal vocabulary, right?

The word dead was used in place of the word sleep, before the word sleep was a word in man's vocabulary, right.

The New Testament was written so that when I ask people, "who in history is famous for the Bed?", they will say "Jesus", right?

The scripture says people were dead, I agree. But if a person does not get the definition for the word "dead" right, he does not get the story right. His statements will then disagree with the true intentions of the scripture/Bible/author, and be recognized as misleading others astray.

The few literate people did have/use the word sleep. But many did not.
The word dead, when said a certain way, may have meant sleep. To change to using the word "sleep" instead of the word "dead", could have been like the US changing to the metric system.

What ever the many reasons, many people are using the word dead when a person is discribed as having been not conscious. It makes the stories confusing. But at the same time emphasizing/spot-lighting vocabulary growth. Something most people don't seem to take into account, when getting history from old writtings. Something a person must do to be correct.

I claim that in Mankind's vocabulary, as it has grown over the years, there was a time when the word sleep had not been introduced yet. And this is true for each word of mankind's vocabulary.

"Dead", was at one time, the one word used to discribe all the states of being not-conscious. And mankind's vocabulary was much less descriptive, especially the written word.

I am not saying Jesus was first with the word sleep, or with the bed. But that the New Testament has begun to present itself as an historical account of Jesus's efforts toward the mass-utilization of both the word sleep, and the bed. I think that from his studies of the Old Testament, Jesus learned this was important, and needed to be done/fulfilled.

The New Testament teaches that 2000 years ago many people still were not using the word sleep yet. And many didn't think the bed was every important. But if you were trying to heal someone, then as today, the energy lost into the ground while sleeping on it, prevented, can be the difference between life and death.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

>"I claim you are crazy because not ONE historian agrees with you."

This is a joke, right? But you have to study instead, to be educated, and have any personal understanding.

"Where's Harrison Ford??? This must be Blade Runner." - Altered State

No-wonder you're not able to learn anything, you're pure/100% politics, and nothing else! It's because of people thinking the way you do, (thinking they don't have to study to be right, just follow the many/the masses), that every new truth discovered is delayed on its way to helping mankind.

Reading the Constitution has become like looking through Galileo's telescope a couple hundred years ago. And like confessing to be a follower of Jesus a couple thousand years ago. What the Pope and his political parrots would describe as anarchy, the U.S. Constitution prescribes as Liberty. Galileo was excommunicated, kept under house arrest in an effort to prevent him from actually educating his fellow man, because those that would see him in possession of the truth would realize all the priests were just kissing butt, not really educated, not really recognizing the truth.

Religion collects ignorant people into something like a herd, and then threatens individuals with a stampede. And because religion can also stampede people to the voting both, we have career politicians kissing the ring of religion. They are the walking dead, which have given up in the race for knowledge, and now grasp at what safety there is in numbers. Their faith in the promise of education has died. The time and effort once spent to maintain a state of learning, is always welcome by the religious group, then used to trample the truth.

An important lesson from the story of Galileo is that, if Galileo is right, then all the priests are just kissing butt. They were serving politics rather than the truth. Their authority arose due to their awareness of, and agreement with, the group's propaganda rather than the truth. This time, if I'm right, and when you learn about it, death takes a holiday.
---------------------
Another, from another forum;

>"Darwinian medicine?"

Where did that term come from? What have you been told it means, it stands for?

Now, what does it mean if Jesus is famous for the bed, and everyone learns it, as they should have from reading the New Testament? If I am right?

>"The bed is evolutionary medicine. People that do not compensate for the height of the trees suffer health problems due to sleeping on the ground. Some agree the term "hell" means "the grave". So, getting people using raised beds is how Jesus and his followers were keeping others from an early grave."

So, why have "Darwinian medicine", if Jesus already pointed it out and used the idea to heal us, and it's recorded in hishory?

Why is/has history being/been asked to repeat itself, if it is already recorded as having happened, in history books as well as our lives?

Could the people that tried to get Jesus out of the way, be still at it today?
--------------------
Another,

>"So fine, oppose him, but why accuse him of having a mental illness? "

Trying to make me look bad, will not change the facts of history. But maybe you think they can be kept hidden from others by killing the messenger/ the real reader of history? Is that why you non-readers claim real-readers are crazy? Is that why ignorant people group together and claim educated individuals are crazy?

Maybe this is the reason you're all now shown to be wrong?

>" As I mentioned before, my experience in college has been that paying customers are less apt to throw away their grades, thus leading to a better learning environment, one I'm more interested in being a part of."

Matthew 10:8 Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give.

Paying customers are less apt to throw away their disinformation that they paid for, and now are shown to have over-valued, when they should.

Paying customers are less apt to throw away their information they paid for, and become less likely to share, information, with others freely.

A tuff pill for some to take maybe, but think about it. Could get US right with God again.

 

i could see how it would be said that he woke the sleeping. maybe not in such a literal way, but people who are spiritually asleep. it feels like i'm surrounded by many zombies.

 

sick/unconscious, not deceased.

"Cornerstone of Human Society"

"While we know that some animals can communicate with each other, in ways that are as yet little understood, we also know that man is the only living being that has developed speech. Words are symbols by means of which we can communicate our thoughts to each other. Ordered thought is impossible without a vocabulary of words. And without words there could certainly be no abstract thinking -thought not connected with the material things which we know through the senses." - Encyclopedia of Popular Science.

Luke 9:60 Jesus said unto him, Let the dead bury their dead: but go thou and preach the kingdom of God.

Yes we are "waking people from the dead" when we educate them, or the knowledge is, or God is, but I think I see a cause and effect at play, between what Jesus is recorded as doing, and recorded history since, explaining why it is many of us now find ourselves sleeping in beds. The use of the bed has really spread/been pushed into use by those that didn't use them, by the followers of Jesus.

A truthful study of our history shows many people were not as advanced as those that kept/made the records were.

Now you study some books, which tell of records made at the time. The records/accounts tell of the bed and the word sleep being used, by the people that kept the records, and in the communities around them. But, of all the people that could have kept records, how many did? Of all the people that could have slept in beds, how many did. Of all the places/communities that could have kept records, how many recordings do we have? Was the info you have studied, causing you to become aware of the norm? Or just the stile of the few that had a better life. Are you being shown spots of where civilization was taking hold, but you would like to think it was the norm?

The scripture says people were dead, I agree. But if a person does not get the definition for the word "dead" right, he does not get the story right. His statements will then disagree with the true intentions of the scripture/Bible/author, and be recognized as misleading others astray.

John 11:1 Now a certain man was sick, named Lazarus, of Bethany, the town of Mary and her sister Martha. 2 (It was that Mary which anointed the Lord with ointment, and wiped his feet with her hair, whose brother Lazarus was sick.) 3 Therefore his sisters sent unto him, saying, Lord, behold, he whom thou lovest is sick. 4 When Jesus heard that, he said, This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of God might be glorified thereby.

Now, the scripture says his sickness was not unto death, right? The correct understanding of the Bible/Our History should take this into account, right?

Jesus was away, he gets word his friend falls sick/unconscious at home, and the other leader/doctors had him pronounced deceased and had him buried. Jesus must have known that lazarus was awake in the tomb, and the girls were feeding him. But they couldn't, or wouldn't, say anything for fear of the community leaders, after being shown to be wrong, in such a thing.

Mark 9:26 And the spirit cried, and rent him sore, and came out of him: and he was as one dead; insomuch that many said, He is dead.

Mark 9:10 And they kept that saying with themselves, questioning one with another what the rising from the dead should mean.

Thanks for your interest Lori_7.
Keep Movin!!!

 

TIME DEGRADATION

MONKEY TRIALS, KILLING THE TRUTH!

OR

PRIMATES ON POLITICAL PARADE!


EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT!

BED HISTORY REFLECTED IN BIBLE TEXT!

EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT!

The following statements shared, I recently had occur in my studies. And, I think they have lead, or point to a conclusion not really noticed or learned by others, yet.
----------------
Me>"And remember, the New Testament says that a group tried to have Jesus put to death, for what he was doing."

Them>"Because he was claiming to be the Messiah despite clearly not being the Messiah, yes."

>"It was because they didn't value free speech, like you, saying you're going to band me. It was not the law there. Someone trying to help and educate the common people, the record shows now."

>"That is a very good question! Yet I'm finding it hard to find the answer.

>"I can say; Jesus would not be recorded as being the Messiah, if they had not tried to put him to death. If the people that tried to have him put to death, had instead valued free speech, there would have been no need for a Messiah. It was by/because the people tried to put Jesus to death, that he has become our Messiah. And, he was not clearly the Messiah until they tried. It seems it would be more clear/true to say, Jesus was offering to be the Messiah, until they tried to kill him, then he became clearly the Messiah.
Hope that helps."

>"Darwinian medicine?"

"Where did that term come from? What have you been told it means, it stands for?

Now, what does it mean if Jesus is famous for the bed, and everyone learns it, as they should have from reading the New Testament? If I am right?

>"The bed is evolutionary medicine. People that do not compensate for the height of the trees suffer health problems due to sleeping on the ground. Some agree the term "hell" means "the grave". So, getting people using raised beds is how Jesus and his followers were keeping others from an early grave."

So, why have "Darwinian medicine", if Jesus already pointed it out and used the idea to heal us, and it's recorded in hishory?

Why is/has history being/been asked to repeat itself, if it is already recorded as having happened, in history books as well as our lives?

Could the people that tried to get Jesus out of the way, be still at it today?"

Them>"Why would politicians care if Jesus made the bed or not?"
---------------
Conclusion: Jesus was teaching evolution. And the politicians in this group had him put to death for it. This, after killing many other people for the same reason, for many years. The Messiah, was foretold of because many people knew this behavior could not be allowed to continue. History has recorded, that along with the Messiah, his whole group, that turned against the truth, gave themselves a death sentence. And this lesson in history, politicians must hide from the people in order to continue, at killing the truth.

Alan
Search + Share ~ Magnetrition
http://www.freewebs.com/alanejackson/index.htm

John 8:38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father. 39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham. 40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. 41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God. 42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. 43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

 

Not true.

 

once incorporated

How so?

My thinking; The word for apple should/needs to mean the same in any language.

The word bear should/tries to mean the same to each person, yet some people may have more of a understanding of bears, thus, greater meaning/understanding of the word bear. Yet the word symbolically used for bear has a common meaning for all people, no matter what the language, once the word has been incorporated into that language.

 

Conquering chaos

Something New Everyday

Or

Running from Insanity

I just finished reading a book, and this statement/sentence has struck me as an important nugget of insight. I share it, and some of the thoughts it has provoked, thinking, it may have the same effect on others.

"Of course, they'd have done better if they hadn't been so stupidly ignorant."
Page 43. TO CONQUER CHAOS - By JOHN BRUNNER.

The author, in the story, is referring to buildings in a town being visited, but doesn't it revealed a truth concerning the lives of every person? The key word used here seems to be "so".

People are always to be found stupidly ignorant, comparatively. No matter how much a person studies and learns, he will always be stupidly ignorant. But only through study and learning can a person become less stupidly ignorant. Not "so" stupidly ignorant anymore. Without learning occurring in a person's life, that person would remain in the same exact state of being stupidly ignorant, and could not therefore do better in the future.

Some say, the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over again with the same results, or, to attempt unsuccessfully at something through/by use of the same method continually with the same negative results. It seems, if the statement made by the author was true, it's the best worded reasoning I've found for finding people living by the saying "learn something new everyday". According to what the author is saying, it's your best hedge/defense against the sickness known as insanity. It seems, a person has to make an attempt toward learning something new, or insanity would have to be the result.

Eternally vigilant in learning, prevents not the making of mistakes, but the making of the same mistakes. And this is noticed occurring as progression. When people can notice that progression has occurred in their lives, hope has reason to bloom, and forgiveness has reason to be found. Through sharing of what one has learn, can insanity be prevented in many? To be found winning in the struggle against insanity catching up, must there be learning and sharing occurring among peoples? Would preventing learning and sharing surely lead to insanity gaining on us?

And must it be the learning of truth rather than something not true, to prevent this insanity due to stagnant ignorance?

I think, by using this statement, the author made an attempt at instilling the fear of God in people. And, did a good job at reminding me of mine.

Alan
Search + Share ~ Magnetrition
http://www.freewebs.com/alanejackson/index.htm

 

Wittnessjudgejury ???

Anyway , there are many cases of misdiagnosed death through time .....sometimes "dead" people woke up in the coffin ......this could be one more case .........not that I care ....

 

I'm thinking differently.

:m:> Whoever thought the Bible would become the new PDR?
> (Physicians desk reference)

Whoever really studied the words in the Bible.
~~~~~~~~

>"Great. Just what need to be discovered...another "sin."

Yes! I agree! The wages of sin is death. And we sin without recognizing it. When we do recongnize a sin, this allows us to avoid a death, that was coming unseen.

If you're going through hell, keep going. - historybuffy
~~~~~~~~

NEW KNOWLEDGE MAKES US LOOK LIKE FOOLS.

THUS: THE HUMBLE ARE THE ONLY ONES THAT FIND IT.

AND POLITICS TRIES TO HIDE IT.


Originally Posted by B_
>Tobit 1:1 "All wisdom is from the Lord God, and hath been always with him, and is before all time."

Originally Posted by alanejackson
In a world/setting of cause and effect, all can be known. I'm just not that good at it, as some may be.


Originally Posted by B_
Wisdom 1:12 "Seek not death in the error of your life, neither procure ye destruction by the works of your hands." I don't see anything here about recognizing sin as being salvation from death.

Originally Posted by alanejackson
What can I say?

Tradition - a historical line of conventions, principles, or attitudes characteristic of a school, social group, movement, etc.

Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

2 Thessalonians 2:15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
~~~~~~~~~

Exodus 1:15 And the king of Egypt spake to the Hebrew midwives, of which the name of the one was Shiphrah, and the name of the other Puah: 16 And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live.

Matthew 2:16 Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently enquired of the wise men.


As a young child, I learned about these events that happened in our history. And I thought the adults/parents of the children killed, for political reasons, must have been really upset.

But now, after the way I've seen abortion used today, I'm thinking differently.


Jeremiah 8:9 The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the word of the Lord; and what wisdom is in them?

 

My studies indicate there is enough evidence documented in history associating Christians with the use of furniture, and from the study of vocabulary growth, to warrent our revaluation of preconceived interpretations. In other words, I have found some data strongly linking Jesus with the common man's usage of furniture as a health aide.However it must be remembered that the bible is just another book of "history" that has been translated, copied and interpolated so many times it's accuracy must be questioned. If fiction has played any part in our history, this record should tell of it. I think the Bible is one of our/mankind's best continuing efforts toward recording history. Sometimes, what we first categorized as fictional, becomes known as part of our reality through understanding and application. It is the perspective from which it is presented that invites skepticism. Over the years, those that have helped compile the information included in the Bible may have had a fictional perspective toward life after self analysis, but who doesn't. The facts are the important parts, the rest can be misleading, purposefully.

My studies indicate there is enough evidence documented in history associating Christians with the use of furniture, and from the study of vocabulary growth, to warrent our revaluation of preconceived interpretations. In other words, I have found some data strongly linking Jesus with the common man's usage of furniture as a health aide.

 

History, Beds, and Jesus.

When a person attempts to read, an effort is being made to reconstruct the thoughts of the author. The reader allows the author to control the thoughts he has, while reading. When this is done correctly, a sharing occurs. Everything ever written offers just such sharing, such continuity between minds. Time can add difficulty to such communications, but is not a restriction. Thus, our best readers best link us, to the past. And our best authors link us, to the future. Communications between generations requires compensating for vocabulary growth, in order to ensure the proper/correct definition for each word read, or the thought reconstructed would be an error. For example, if you were to read that the son of a carpenter was going around "raising the dead", and you thought the word "dead" meant "deceased" rather than "sleeping", you would construct a false account of the carpenter rather than becoming aware of the importance of each person sleeping in a bed. After studying the story of Jesus, many conclude that he was sent by God to live and die, in such a way, that others may live a more fulfilled/better life. Isn't every man?

An Experiment. A simple test/query!

"When I ask a group of students, "Who's famous for the car?" they say "Ford", then I ask, "Who's famous for the light bulb?" they say "Edison", then I ask, "Who's famous for the bed?" and most are stumped, and say they never thought about it, but once in a while a person in a group will quickly say/guess Jesus. And when I ask why they say that, they say, "Because of the manger!"."

Those that think maybe I could be on to something, try asking people the questions I have been asking. It has taken me years to have about 10 people say Jesus, without help/clues. But, if people give up trying to guess, tell them some guy says Jesus was, and see what they say.

Its there, in our history, I had a man about 60-70 say "manger" a few weeks back. I've been lead to it by the stories, and tested for it in the educational memory of others. And you can tell when some people realize it's right, but then try to act as if they didn't see it in their thoughts. Not able to be politically incorrect in their thinking, in public.

Jesus being responsible mass utilization of the bed, in the same way Henry Ford is famous for the automobile. Jesus was not first with the invention of the bed, but he was first to realize "everyone" needs to sleep up off the ground.

Alan
Search + Share ~ Magnetrition
http://www.freewebs.com/alanejackson/index.htm

 

i dont think anyone sleeps on bare tatami...futons..and my weeping back tells me it isnt good for u.

 

I have given some thought to the statement about the Japanese.

Natural resources, such as trees, that would be used to make beds are not plentiful on island nations. Thus, the ways of people are controlled more closely. It would not seem feasible to do. The loss of that many trees would have to great a detrimental effect.

If you don't have a bed, a raised floor is better than the ground. And, a mat is better than just the ground. We do the best we can with what we've got.

 

What I'm saying is, each word in our vocabulary had a date or time when it was made-up or introduced. At the time of Jesus, some/a few had the word sleep, but many still were using the word dead to cover all the conditions of being not awake, not conscious.

So, many people, the average person seeing Jesus the carpenter, build and put a sick person in a bed, rather then leave him on the ground to keep getting sicker under that condition, would have described what he saw as "Jesus raising the dead".

Back then, if you would have used the word sleep, many would not have understood you. Vocabulary growth is the main point of the story.

In the future, people will have to understand this, and compensate for it, in order for them to understand old/past writings. Or will lose their link to our past, and all the knowledge stored there.

Now that be important, right?

 

Jesus puts magnets in my bed.

 

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

I think that is telling us/man how our vocabulary started, and how important it is to us/man.

"And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."

I think that is/was their way of saying, like what we see some today saying about someone that has studied alot, "That guy is a walking encyclopedia". They were saying Jesus was a walking Bible!

Sleeping on the ground feels good when the air is hot, too. My dog uses that knowledge. One's logic is based on one's understanding, yes? In Star Wars, the guy cut open the belly of a big animal and stayed there because it was warmer. But history is saying if you can plan where your going to sleep, most of the time, it should be in a bed. Health data is found in history concerning those that do, and those that do not.

My understanding is that before the words sleep, death, deceased, unconscious, those states of being were all covered by the word dead, meaning not conscious, or found to be not conscious, in any original language. History is written it a way as to show our good side alot. And it gets played with alot. But it only happen one way, in this world of cause and effect. History can always be dedused, writing it down only makes it a little easier. Writing it down correctly might make it too easy. As vocabulary grows, more complex thought is required to have access to our past.

In the Bible, God, it is said, caused Adam to sleep, and a part of his body was used to make something else, I forget what, but it seems the word sleep is used before the word die, in reference to death. That may not seem important, until you notice the connection between Jesus and the bed.


Matthew 20:16 So the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen.

 

When people learn about the Jesus in the Bible, They think differently, better. The way a person thinks can be learned from their actions.

The Jesus bed connection is only a step in learning. More important is to learn that what Jesus was doing was Godly/Good. And that what others did against that, was not.

If you were more Godly, more educated, you would set a better example. It's seems little, the difference, but it makes all the difference in the world.

Because people are ignorant about Jesus and the bed, the politician smiles because they say what they do, and at the outcome/effect of their sayings. While it makes those like Jesus weep.

Would the effect be different on those listening to you, if you had a different perspective toward life?

It just may not be possible that you could correct me, in this matter. Because it is our history. Yet rather than really study, and come to that conclusion, personally, people try to argue or debate it. That's the definition of insanity, to keep trying to do something that is not possible.

If the theory is correct, you/we must create a new paradigm which allows for it. Because they don't study, most people I share this information with don't reach that conclusion. Instead, they heckle me, or accused me of having the problem that they have. Maybe that's the way some people begin the process?


Matthew 5:20 For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.