Well, Ivanovich and gang Women/ females have breast to feed infant babies, of which size of the breast does not mean a larger production of breast milk or increase quality of breast milk. However generally larger breast produce more milk, due to large glands and more fat storage of which is transformed into milk for the infant. medium size breast are probally the best as quality of breast milk increases with concentration. Infants nurse from the breast because their stomachs can not digest regular foods. Infants in the womb of a female are directly fed from the mothers blood through the emblical cord so foods are already broken down so its pure plasma. During pregancy when the infant is in the womb the mother gains weights,by the storgae of fat so that the female can use this fat to produce plasma to feed the infant. ( Actually getting a female that has some fat on her body pregnat is a good idea, the less foergin food that she has to eat the better. The second baby in the family has the best avialablity of pure plasma because the female has gain and stored the fat to feed the infant in the womb and as well when breast feeding) infants that nurse eat the purest food which is human plasma, both in the womb and from the breast this prevents any foregin matter form contanimating the infant during its gestation period. It is protection where foregin matter may cause geneic anomiles or infection by means of virus or parasite. ( for example a virus that effects trees and not humans, could if it where introduced to the infant in the womb develope in to a virus that effects humans and thereby endanger the local population, this process has also been used to develope immunities in children to certain dieasese, such as the development Small Poxs vaccination. (Small Poxs was a major human dieases at one time). Infant should breast feed for about four years at which time the brain has reached development. Food supply has been directly linked to the size development and fertilty of females, females that have good food supply develope larger breast and become fertile at younger ages around age 12 and 13. Women that have less food supply in adolescents do not develope untill about age 15 to 16. Even so we see and increased quality with women that are in the 15 to 16 age group catagory. This most likly due to growth density, where in the 15 to 16 age group the density of cells in a given area is higher resulting in higher quality breast milk. In the 12 to 13 age group more growth results in greater seperation of cells over area and so less density. Both groups latter in age would appear to even out in preformance and qualtiy being about the same depending on eatting habits and activity as they age. genetically speaking females that come from a family of females that breast feed would or should show greater preformance than women that do not come from such linage. More facts about breast....... Females actually have 3 sets of breast, that means a women has 6 breast that are along her front side, So you must understand that females of todays standard are not actully fully developed to potential, if we looked far back into histiry you would find that females have 6 or 4 breast. The oddest breast fact........ the male penis is actually a organ of the breast family. DwayneD.L.Rabon
Ermmm, do you have a link for this? For example, are you claiming that the human female species and her ancestors had, in history, 4 to 6 breasts? Links please? How far back are you going here? The same goes for the penis being part of the "breast family".. Link please.
They looks more like balls to me... On topic. I mean not why women have big huge mdeium etc, why they have them at all could not they feed they baby's if they only had nipples like men? I think tits intended for children to grab them and like rack, since children usually know how to use them mom's dont teach them right so probably manual on using tits is written in them as instinct?
It's bullshit. You have to go pretty effing far back on the primate family tree for that. I'm not even sure if any primates 8-10 million years ago had more than two.
Evo-fucking-lution. Look it up sometime. Men wanna mate with some bitch with huge tits, so over time, women with larger breasts tend to reproduce more than smaller breasted women. Natural Selection.
So bigger tits better reproductive ability? But question is why females has big breasts i dont think in the first place they have them so big because male like it...
The penis is part of the breast family. Really? The penis and clitoris are made from the same structures and both of them evolutionarily would of had a use before breasts even came into the picture. As for women having more than two breasts I guess it could be possible since even women today develop extra fully functioning breasts. But humans usually only have one to two children at a time so there really isn't a need for more breasts like a dog who might have 5 or 8 puppies at once.
BZZZZT (That's the angry buzzer noise for when you're wrong). Any parent knows that breast size is not an indicator of ability to produce milk in human females.
Here is an interesting question in relation to the original post... Psychosocial function stems from DNA, who is not to say that we as system (Humans) spinging from another (DNA) are not merely at the whim of a master psychosocial engineer... Nature. In other words, as a mere thought, large breasts may not serve a biological purpose, but look at the way it effects people.
Evolution is just theory we dont know how it works for sure... And no i dont know how exactly it works can u explain from evolution point of view. (here without sending me to read something somewhere).
You're right, we don't. My bad, I was talking about natural selection mostly. Those who are more "fit" have their genes carried further in time. For example, peacocks have these crazy ass tail feathers which actually make them easier to kill. Why do they have them? Peahens reproduce more with those with bigger tail feathers, so over time the average tail feather size increases. This is the same for breasts on women.
Appreantly you misread,made a misinterpretations and have problems with the subject in general, given the sturcture of your sentence, most parents have no understanding of milk production in human females. And breast size is a indicatior of ability of a human female to produce breast milk. You must be hearing your own buzzer Trippy Dwayne D.L.Rabon
"It's well known that as a population, we've all been getting bigger," says Dr Joanna Scurr, a principal lecturer in biomechanics at the University of Portsmouth. "The larger we become overall, then the larger women's breasts will become. There is not any evolutionary reason breasts are getting bigger: it's simply a consequence of us all becoming generally bigger. "Breasts are increasing because women today have a higher proportion of fat in their breasts than they used to. The structure of the breast is divided into the functional glandular element - comprising the milk ducts and support tissues - and fat. "The functional part of the breast changes size at certain points during a woman's life. It will get bigger when she's pregnant and breast-feeding - this is why women's breasts generally get bigger at this time, and smaller when they're going through the menopause. This is because the body no longer needs the breast for milk.
Breast size is not an indicator of a female's ability to produce milk. Women with small breasts can breastfeed their babies as well. If a woman does not have breast then that would effect her ability to produce milk, but if she does regardless of how huge or how small they are they still function the same. Women with larger breast just tend to have more fat not more milk ducts.
I don't understand, can you give other example or explain... Wait a sec why females without (i mean with very small) breast cant produce enough milk, i were always thinking breasts have only fat in them, whats the connection with milk, where milk is generated in female body?
