Well I may I suggest that I will certianly do my part to make sure no female breast goes neglected. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I recall I wondered why women had such big bumps on their chest, but then after puberty, it just made so much sense. Just part of their natural reproductive equipment God gave them, to feed their babies. So should the question be, how many people around here haven't went through puberty yet? But then, that wouldn't really fully explain why to wonder about the question I suppose, as there's probably plenty of adults around here already, and it could actually be a good question, so does the following question have any commonality to the original question? Why do cars have such big wheels and tires? Why not use smaller tires? Uh, maybe bigger tires work better or give a smoother ride? So maybe larger breasts can feed a growing baby easier, or maybe even a set of twins or triplets? Yeah, small breasts feed babies too, but maybe at a higher "strain" level, barely keeping up the with hungry baby? Yeah, better nutrition, and natural selection of those who have the most children, may possibly be factors in breast size. That can push those with better genetics for having babies, to larger proportionate numbers, although it may not have much effect on humans? BTW, I believe mothers should be allowed to breastfeed in public places, because it's the pro-life thing to do, to better welcome families to enjoy having their precious darling babies, and because it's common in developing countries still more pronatalist than us. Besides, people eat in public, and it's much the same.
Perhaps, most of the time. Especially in an age of options and alternatives, say like infant formula, if breastfeeding just isn't working out so well. Then too, cars with undersized engines, probably climb hills okay as well, although not as fast as cars with more powerful engines. And maybe smaller shorter adults, are "adequate" as well. They said in the commentary or whatever of the recent Titanic movie, that they had to widen the grand staircase a bit, because in these modern times, the actors are bigger. Due to better nutrition, people generally are taller and bigger, than they were just a century ago. Perhaps something similar is at work with breast size. Better nutrition seems about the best explanation to me, of puberty coming earlier. In an age of seeming almost "overabundance" of food, isn't it just possible, that the human body adapts a bit, as it can, to more efficiently convert relatively cheap organic matter, or food, into addition human beings, babies, all the faster, if even perhaps just slightly? We keep pumping so much food into our bodies, so the body more eagerly produces the bigger breast size and little bit faster or greater volume of milk, to push out the babies slightly all the faster? Large families are nothing new. But some changes may be so subtle, that there aren't the studies or clear observation to determine an actual trend or not. Back a century ago, most people did not practice "birth control" as it was rather unnatural, and quite unnessary. Large families were common. But I wonder, if a couple comes together to marry, as young as people commonly did back in the day, and they religiously or for whatever reasons, practice no means of "birth control" at all, would families today, with the better nutrition and all, tend to grow a little bit faster than back in the day? Might some people be getting a little bit more fertile, more likely to enjoy having baby after baby, for maybe a decade, or maybe several decades if they marry young? I know bigger boobs probably don't necessarily mean more babies, but maybe there could be a little bit of a trend there, that we haven't even noticed, partly due to the rampant awful contraceptive pushing, and then also, because we aren't so smart as we think, or not very imaginative, or we believe what the corporate-controlled media tells us to think, and don't ask the right questions or very much think independently. Could humans also be getting a little bit more horny, more eager to reproduce? Or are some of the effects, only cultural, signs of an increasingly immoral or superficial "entertainment" society or media? Is society being so obsessed with sex, as some might think we are, something "new," or merely the result of the higher population levels of the modern age, and people feeling they have to scream a bit louder, to be heard over the media noise, of everybody trying to get their sound bites into the limelight? Maybe people have no greater sexual/reproductive desire than in the past? Maybe just because there's more people alive, around talking, it just becomes more noticable? If more people are around having more babies than in the past, that doesn't necessarily mean that the proportion has risen. Maybe only some absolute numbers in some certain groups, is all that has risen? Or maybe it does mark the early onset of a naturally-hastening population growth trend, that we just haven't much noticed so well yet? I would like to think that also the proportion of people letting their families naturally grow possibly large, could be rising. Could even be a sign of a much-needed revival of Christian faith. There could possibly be more wondrous baby booms to come!
I figured it was because if they had 2 more things on their body to play with they would never get anything done.
Proof their is a god And he's a perv... but then he have them brains witch makes him once again a sadist
Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! A man pokes my breast I'll poke him in the eye. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!oke:
Oh really? That must be why those "buttons" are so big then? Because nature, or God, says that to have sex, is a really good thing, within marriage and preparation of the proper family nest to receive offspring, at least.
Why not poke (or nicely stroke) him in his chest or his penis? Seems to correspond more appropriately. Presumably, most men poking breasts, hopefully are one's chosen mate already.
