Is there a version of eternity...

Discussion in 'Religion Archives' started by Simon Anders, Nov 1, 2008.

  1. greenberg until the end of the world Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,811
    It's a matter of logical analysis:

    For a tooth to rot would take x units of time. Right? This is how the concept of decay works - in a particular extent of time, the decay takes place, until it is complete.

    For example, "It took uncle Tom's molar 45 years to rot."
    Now, if we keep the same conceptual structure, and replace the time unit "45 years" with "eternity", we get:
    "It took uncle Tom's molar an eternity to rot."
    When does eternity finish? Never. Ergo, the decay has never completed. Ergo, uncle Tom's molar never rot.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. lightgigantic Banned Banned

    Messages:
    16,330
    JDawg
    The notion of eternity becomes repulsive when we determine its value by material standards. As you accurately determine, death is a great mercy in this world since there is no eternal platform of pleasure.

    The argument is, however, that there is a different value involved in a liberated existence. In other words, there is a type of pleasure afforded in liberated existence that if fully accommodating to an eternal identity. In this world we don't find any "object" (whether it is one's car, one's family and friends, one's fame or even one's body) that is resistant to change. Nonetheless, we adamantly serve these objects in the pursuit of pleasure.

    The idea of heaven is that god is the centre of service, and god (unlike practically anything else we experience in this world) does not change. If one comes to the state of dovetailing one's desire to finding pleasure in god, then that is sufficient to qualify them for liberated existence. Unfortunately we get waylaid by illusion and more often then not find pleasure in things which will shortly not exist ... so the whole scene becomes one of the cheater and the cheated ... which is certainly an unpleasant prospect for eternity
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. StrangerInAStrangeLand SubQuantum Mechanic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,396
    Hell.
    1111
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Simon Anders Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,535
    A very logical answer. Do you ever find anything appealing or unappealing despite what logic indicates you should feel?
     
  8. lightgigantic Banned Banned

    Messages:
    16,330
    meanwhile, make yourself at home (complete with rotting molars, dead hamsters and fleeting youth or whatever ...)

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  9. swarm Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,207
    Actually its experiencial and just coincidentally logical as well.

    If I tell you you are going to spend some time, is that appealing with no idea how it is spent?

    Time itself is necessary but not sufficient to having a good time.

    There is however a potential exception to this. One would presume there is a point at which one who is enlightened is complete unto himself, empty, unmoved, at peace. Such a person's state would no longer be effected by external considerations and eternity in heaven or hell would be no different one from the other.

    Of course since eternity, perfectly enlightened beings, heaven and hell are all just idle chatter, we are left with actual time and real people who do things in time, derive experience from the combination and become tired of what they are doing.
     
  10. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Perhaps you're right.
     
  11. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    I mean faith in a god.. religions.
    I see what you mean with the kid-story, but usually people grow up and see how things really are. Why does religion stick ?
     
  12. Simon Anders Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,535
    In a sense your rhetorical question is in part an answer. For you it would depend on what you were doing, the mere idea of an unbelievably long time is not daunting for you. We've been talking about eternity - I am aware of non-durational versions of this, but since you mention 'some time' above I will look at Joe on the street's version. Given your rhetorical - and perhaps also actual - question above, I get the impression that a billion years, as long as you expect to be experiencing this or that and not experiencing certain other things, at least regularly, could be at worst not unappealing.

    I think there are other people who would find the idea daunting or scary.

    So this last response to me, which expresses the ideas rather universally, it seems to me is actually a specific, personal response. Which is, of course, what I am looking for, at least also.
     
  13. swarm Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,207
    You have made a crucial mistake here. Uncle Tom's molars never finish rotting, or rather at they do when t = eternity, but they do the most significant portion of their rotting in the beginning and continue to rot forever.

    An endless decay.
     
  14. greenberg until the end of the world Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,811
    In that case, the teeth have to renew to some extent forever too, so that there is dental matter to rot for all eternity; and if they renew, it can't rightfully be said that they are rotting.


    Anyway, this is a logical and practical cunundrum, and I am not sure that the conceptual framework of our usual everyday experience of impermanence and change can be adequately transfered onto eternity.

    We sometimes tend to think that eternity is simply life as we usually know it, but prolonged indefinitely, without there being a death at the end, only age.

    But there are "versions" of eternity where there is no birth, aging, illness and death, so most of what we usually think is "real" wouldn't apply there to begin with.
     
  15. Balerion Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,596
    Well, I suppose that's as fair an answer as there is.

    Because the questions answered by the existence of a god don't always have other obvious alternatives. Consider what it was that made you realize Santa didn't really exist; likely, it was either catching your parents in the act, or hearing every other kid at school say it wasn't true because their parents said so. If you lived in a bubble where you couldn't really have access to the alternatives to the story, you'd probably still believe in Santa.

    Religion is similar. Can you tell me what created the universe? Can you tell me why the universe exists? Can you tell me what happens to our consciousness when we die? Because the quickest, easiest answer is "God did it", that's what makes religion last. If the day ever comes that we can answer those questions, you'll see religion fade. Of course, they'll likely be replaced by new religions that answer the new questions that will inevitably arrise.
     
  16. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Green they just rot and fall out and then you have to live eternity without teeth.
    Why do you think time grinds to virtual hold when you live forever ? It makes no sense.
     
  17. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    All excellent points, and I agree.
    However, I don't believe people believe in god to explain the creation of the universe (if such a thing even happened in the first place), what happens after you die, etc.
    It's simply because they have been indoctrinated to believe. I don't think many theists have come to believe through a rational process.
     
  18. greenberg until the end of the world Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,811
    In which case it cannot be said that they rot forever.


    It seems that your understanding of eternity is basically this:
    "Eternity is simply life as we usually know it, but prolonged indefinitely, without there being a death at the end, only age."
     
  19. greenberg until the end of the world Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,811
    Agreed. Hence at least in some religious traditions, there is focus on eliminating blind faith and pursuing direct knowledge/perception.
     
  20. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    No, but you made that assertion, no one else did.

    That's my understanding of living forever. Why should it be anything else ?
    Eternity in itself doesn't require life.
     
  21. Balerion Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,596
    Well, yes, but these are the reasons why they continue to believe. Remember, the Bible begins with the story of creation...I'd say it plays a pretty important role in their faith.

    Also, explaining the creation of the universe is likely among the reasons religion was created.
     
  22. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Sure, but my question was why religion persists

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  23. Simon Anders Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,535
    Actually someone else did and perhaps it seemed you were joining their discussion.
     

Share This Page