Bush going down as the worst POTUS in history!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by joepistole, Nov 10, 2008.

  1. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Just a thought Mr. Buffalo, why do you always copy others even in your insults? I challenge you to think an original thought just once in your life, preferably using logic and reasoning. But I will settle for anything as long as it is an original thought.

    Not going to tell us in what region of the country you have your radio gig or perhaps you don't have a radio gig at all.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931

    As to original thoughts, please provide one that isn't from Democratic Talking points and play book, you need to look to your own repertoire.

    You seem to be stuck at Kool Aid, Talking Points, and accusing me of using Rush, and Hannity Talking point, you know, I don't think I have ever quoted them as a source.

    I already have, several time, didn't you recognize them, your the one who seems to have no originality in your retorts.

    The funny thing is that there isn't a original thought in all of your rhetoric, or
    retorts.

    The rhetoric is the old democratic play book, class envy, and as to Insults, they have all been done by some one else, but I do have a better repertoire than you.

    Crossing verbal swords with you is like dueling with a target dummy.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    This is something you repeatedly say in your postings when you are backed into a cornner...go for that old Ad hominem. Substance grasshopper, substance. This exactly what you have repeatedly done in the past when cornered, throw up dirt and then do a vanishing act.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2008
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. G. F. Schleebenhorst England != UK Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,213
    Uhhhhhhh I think compared to Truman, Bush, who I really don't like, is a saint.
     
  8. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    I have to agree with you G.F. George II cannot even get a decent book deal. I know W was planning on doing what Clinton did, enhance his wealth with speaches, etc. But he has botched things so bad that his post office opportunities are going to be very limited.

    http://www.abc3340.com/news/stories/1108/569050.html

    Junior wants a book deal to explain his problems. But no one wants to give him a book deal now...poor baby. Maybe daddy can buy him a book deal. I am sure that when he writes his book, it will be with a ghost writer.
     
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2008
  9. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    Yes, really, backed into a corner?

    Well when he produces substance I will acknowledge it, He is always talking about His point, well if he is the only one who understand his point, is their any substance to that point?

    Now as to you, look at your own Faustian portrait, you carry more than your own share of warts, cankers, and cancers of the ego.

    The funny thing is that you avoid debate on the issue, and go for the Ad Hominem all to often.

    Then you claim innocence, yes you sit on the side line and throw dirt very well.

    Your favorite retort's are the source is Right Winged Biased, The opponent is a Kool Aid Drinker, The all that is used are DNC, Rush, or Hannity, talking points.

    Yes, crossing words with you is like dueling with a target dummy.
     
  10. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Yes really Buffalo Roam, whenever you are backed into a corner, which is all the time, you avoid addressing the issues. You change the issue. You bring out a straw man. You never ever deal with the issues. You treat a challenge not with fact or reason but with straw man and ah hominem.

    I use ad hominem (and watch you repeat this idea) to try to get through to you, to try to cause you to think...plus it is kind of fun to do to you. Koolaid represents the fact that you accept readily and without question the party line as espoused by Hannity and Limbaugh. You imitate them in your posts. You use their techniques. You are a prime example of a Ditto Head and I am sure you take great pride in that lablel as Rush has taught you too. So when I refer to koolaid drinking I am trying to get people to think...not just blindly accept.

    Right wing is an appropriate description. So I see no issues there. I don't get the connection with "DNC, Rush or Hannity". You have not proven your case yet again. You have not shown not one thing I have l have lifted from the DNC. Gee I wonder why.

    Just because someone does not agree with you does not mean they are "liberal" in the classic sense. In the Hannity and Limbaugh lexicon "liberal' appears to mean anyone who has an oppinion different from theirs. And you seem to share the same defintion.

    If you do this poorly with a target dummy then you should be counting your stars you never had to deal with a live combatant...else you would not be here today

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  11. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    :roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:

    Yes, still no response to the Debate.

    And anyone who doesn't agree with you is a Kool Aid Drinking Conservative, huh? joe.
     
  12. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910

    Not at all Mr. Buffalo, not at all. There are plenty of folks a round, that disagree with me and they are not koolaid drinkers. They do their own thinking. But we have fundamental disagreements. So we have to agree to disagree.
     
  13. hypewaders Save Changes Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,061
  14. Buffalo Roam Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,931
    Again self serving, evaluation of self and motive, joe, you have become boring, at least pj was interesting in a bunbling puppy sort of way,...You,...have just become absolutly boring.
     
  15. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Well old George has less than two more months to screw things up. What can he do to add to his legacy?
     
  16. hypewaders Save Changes Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,061
    Not much. <- a statement

    He's lame. <- under statement
     
  17. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
  18. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    How come he was elected a second time ? :bugeye:
     
  19. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    I think you can summarize as, friends in high places coupled with Rove's abiltiy to play of fear and stuff key positions with politcal hacks.
     
  20. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    Perhaps. I just find it strange that he was chosen worst president ever when he was elected president twice.. :shrug:
    I find it hard to believe his first term was so much better than his last.
     
  21. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Well the guy was not elected president the first time...only with the support of his buds on the Supreme Court and his riotous supporters on the street was he able to take the office in his first term.

    Aside from being born with a silver spoon in his mouth, Bin Laden was his next best supporter/aid to power by scaring the American populace with new terror. In times of stress people tend to circle the wagons and make do with what they have. If Bin Laden had not attacked the World Trade Center, there would have been no way Bush could have achieved a second term, even with his friends in high places controlling the voting machines in key states like Ohio and the fear mongering turning Kerry (a war hero) into a fearsome tratior.
     
  22. Enmos Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    43,184
    I see your point, but fact remains that he wouldn't have been able to pull that off if the margins in support weren't already quite small.
     
  23. joepistole Deacon Blues Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    22,910
    Humans are interesting creatures. You have roughly 33 percent of the poplulation die hard Republicans who would vote for a goat if the Republicans nominated it. And you have 33 percent Democrat who would act similarly. So you only have a group of about 33 percent that acts semi-rationally in the ballot box. And that group was very affected by the fear mongering and the constant barrage of bull from conservative media. Media does matter....that is why so much is spent on advertising every year.
     

Share This Page