Jesse Ventura's Censored 9/11 Commentary

OK, let's summarize it:

Anyone who thinks the towers were taken down by explosives is a fucking moron. Why?

Because:

1. You don't need to train 20 people (danger of being discovered) for months, just blow the damn building up.

2. You can time the collapse when the buildings are actually FULL, thus instead of 3K, you have 50K casualties.

Later you can claim whoever you want did the planning. So because of these reasons it is simply STUPID to think that there were both planes and explosives planned....

P.S.: Oh yeah, if one or both planes don't make it to the buildings (let's face it pretty good chance) then what, you have a building full of explosives?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You might if you were brainwashing them for suicide.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Of course a conspiracies of this scale greatest flaw is sheer number of people involved and in the know.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

From this article http://www.rollingstone.com/politic...st_the_hopeless_stupidity_of_911_conspiracies

 

That's a hilarious way of summing it up. But as stupid as it may sound, that is indeed precisely how it went down. I had a cousin who was working at the WTC a couple of weeks before the attack and he said all these construction workers suddenly showed up and started stripping down all the walls, ceilings and wires. His computer desk was up against one of the corners, so there was this guy wiggling around and drilling under his desk telling him "don't mind me, this will only take half an hour or so, you can keep working if you like". He left a bunch of stuff taped to the wall behind my cousin's PC, so my cousin asked what it was. "Just a little bit of thermite" was the explanation. "Really it's pretty harmless, but please try not to touch it."

 

I had a friends of my uncles cousin that was taken by aliens to Venus, their he married the Venus queen, and she laid a whole clutch of eggs and he was like "I'm not taking care of these things!" and he stole a space ship from a giant see slug and came back to earth, only what he thought was 2 hours passing was actually 2 years here on earth, and then his head caught on fire, and doctors were like "you better get that checked out!" and he was like "aaah it ok, no biggy" so to stop his head from burning he had to wear a fish bowl over his head, but this made him easy to spot by his wife's bounty hunter space battletoad and he was taken back to Venus, and forced to take care of all those... things. True story, swear.

 

You don't get it. The whole suicide part is unnecessary since you already have the buildings full of explosives. Creating evidence against anybody is piece of cake...

 

The problem is fundamentally an issue of behavioral science.

By "problem" I mean the problem the 9/11 Commissioners Hamilton and Lee document in their book, and that Farmer, lawyer for the 9/11 commission, documents in his book.

Likewise, the problem that the American Behavioral Scientist Journal scientifically illuminates in an entire issue recently.

The minds, emotions, and hearts of Americans simply do not have the huevos to deal with State Crimes Against Democracy.

It is because of the national superiority complex (a.k.a. U.S. exceptionalism).

 

Did you read the paper?

 

I did not mention anything about "insiders". I am voicing an opinion that there are valid questions about events.

As to a hypothetical answer. Once the cameras were up and running, to draw out the scale and horror of the "event" perhaps?

 

Sure, a hot potato like this paper could absolutely lead to discomfort.

Fair enough, I cannot vouch for the integrity of the paper beyond a layman's perspective. Perhaps I can find some peer reviews.

According to Niels Harrit, these were very special paint chips.