Top 10 Misapprehensions about islam...

Saddam was definitely an asshole and maybe the worst dictator in the world at that time, but he wasn't a terrorist. And, not that I give a shit about the UN, but he wasn't the only one who has violated resolutions.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So how did jews go from 7% land ownership to like 90% in the course of a year if they didn't steal it?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

he didn't have WMD's he couldn't afford them. that was merely a threat to make the countries around Iraq think it was more powerful than it was so they wouldn't invade.
Um and woman in Iraq didn't were burkas under Saddam, they do now.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No they weren't. the pope just wanted control of the holy lands for christindom so they would have control over their trade routes. by the time of the palestinian crusades the muslims were incapable of making any attacks like that.

 

and the blame firmly rests on christians. first off the seiges of Vienna(there was more than one) were done by the ottamon turks who played no part in the crusades.

 

.

and why should it give it's lands?
do you give your house to a strangter? or do you give some rooms from your house to a stranger? why didnt israeil ask for lands from france, or from u.s.a, or from u.k? or maybe china? or maybe, why didn't it make some artificial islands, all the money it wasted on killing people and stealing and occupying lands, could make some islands for it, and make a community with an exelent life style...

 

.

what if he killed your family?

 

.

are you talking to me?
i didnt talk to you you know

 

.

oh, they call it borrowing...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

(not really)

 

.

lol

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

so ur in, welcome, sandy really makes me laugh,

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

No. And stop sending me threatening PM's. I've had enough.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Typical...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

.

threating??? what threating.
ok, are you now going to say i'm a terr*** or something? wow, you really impressed me.

dn dn dn, it's time to get your pills, don't forget them,
you should thank me cause i reminded you,

oh, just pleas don't hurt me, you are stroong,

 

.

i should stop talking to you, or propably you'll invade my country, and say it's to help us, wow, good luck!! just don't invade us, it's ok we don't need your help, pleas, don't hurt me!!!

 

.

Lol

:crazy:
:runaway:
:roflmao:

 

here's a kiss "mmuuaaah" :thankyou:

now here's a paper so you can clean your face from the kiss :m:

 

Well then we're back to here (your post #181 and my reply #186)

 

In1947/8 The british were happy to give up the land they had occupied for nearly thirty years to the Israelis and palestinians. The Israeli accepted the annex, (made and agreed by the UN) and were happy to share, but the palestinians were not, they did not want the jews there, so they waged war. Incidentally the palestinians at the time had been occupied for the previous 350 years, and now they were offered lands of there own, next door to the Israelis, when you wage a war, and lose "to the victor goes the spoils".

 

there are so many things wrong with that its not funny. first off the UN didn't make nor agree to the annexx it only offered a potential suggestion secondly the jews/israelis weren'y happy to share they had every intention of expanding. thirdly the palestinians didn't wage war the "Israelis" did hence why the Israeli had been stockpiling weapons but the palestinians were not. the palestinian want the same thing they have always wanted to be able to control their own lands and to live in peace. they weren't offered shit. what you call and offere was a demand to give up more than half their land to foriegn jewish people simply because they wanted it.


and I'm not talking about state ownership but personal which shouldn't have changed war or no war.


seems to me you admit they stole but think they should get away with it because of who they are

 

Taken fairly in war. Glass houses, pj.

I hope indeed that you realize that the Siege of Vienna was hundreds of years - almost a millenium - after the conquest of Palestine by Islam. Whatever your political affiliation, there really is no question that the Crusades were a response to Islamic aggression. Ergo: the blame of the initiation of the Crusades actually cannot rest on Christianity. Strange but true. :shrug:

 

says you who lies and distorts history. also their is no proviso in anything says prtivate land can be transfered because of war. the public ownership yes but not private.